This is a preview and has not been published. View submission

Comparison of jaw arch size in stunting patients at Asemrowo Public Health Center

Jaw arch size Malocclusion Stunting Medicine Orthodontic

Authors

  • Ida Bagus Narmada
    ida-b-n@fkg.unair.ac.id
    Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia; School of Dental Medicine, Universitas Ciputra, Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Dyva Amalia Noor Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Nafasya Putri Brillianti Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Nurul Aisyah Rizki Putranti Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Ananda Firman Putranto Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Ratna Nurlia Alfiandini Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Alida Alida Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia

Downloads

Background: The etiology of malocclusion is multifactorial; it can occur due to intrinsic, extrinsic factors, or a combination of both. Malnutrition, which is one of the extrinsic factors of malocclusion, is a frequent case in Indonesia. An example of a malnutrition case that commonly occurs in Indonesia is stunting in children’s growth and development, which can trigger malocclusions such as crowded teeth and bone crowding. Purpose: To identify the size of the dental arches in stunting sufferers at the Asemrowo public health center. Methods: In the study model of stunting patients, the length and width of the jaw arch were measured. The results of the measurements are then analyzed and compared with the data from the measurements of healthy children to see whether there are significant differences. Results: In terms of maxillary arch length, the 7-year-old age group yields p = 0.179. In terms of maxillary arch width, the 7-year age group yields p = 0.282. In terms of mandibular arch length, the 7-year-old age group yields p = 0.398. In terms of maxillary arch width, the 7-year age group yields p = 0.398. In terms of maxillary arch length, the 8-year age group yields p = 0.438. In terms of maxillary arch width, the 8-year-old age group yields p = 0.082. In terms of mandibular arch length, the 8-year-old age group yields p = 0.302. In terms of mandibular arch width, the 8-year-old age group yields p = 0.190. Conclusion: There is no significant difference between the length and width of the jaw arch in all age groups (p > 0.05).

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>