PATIENTS 'PREFERENCES AND EXPERIENCES IN CHOOSING THE MODEL OF NORMAL LABOR CARE
Downloads
Abstract
Background: In the last few decades the trend of work has shifted from normal delivery to Sectio Caesarea (SC), this is evidenced by the increasing incidence of CS deliveries in various countries. cesarean delivery without medical indications is one of the biggest factors causing cesarean delivery, this is due to the fear of normal labor pain. However, in developing countries, women still see a lot of interest in being able to be born normally, so the purpose of this study is to find out preferences and research experiences in choosing a normal delivery care model. Methods: The method used is a qualitative research by exploring, with the population is postpartum mothers who are in the target area of the Tuban Public Health Center and the Semanding Health Center, Tuban, East Java. The total respondents in this study were 8 respondents, the results of interviews with 8 respondents were then analyzed by transcribing verbatim, making general points, noting ideas that arise, and indexing or coding. Results: 1) preference for places of occurrence, geographical and economic factors, 2) preference in choosing a model that is carried out by a fast recovery process, and feeling like a real mother. 3) The preference for stress helpers is influenced by experiences from other families. Conclusion Preferences for nursing care models can affect the mother's decision making in choosing a nursing care model that can have an impact on her delivery experience
Betrán, A. P. et al. (2016) ‘The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014', PLoS ONE, 11(2), pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343.
BKKBN (2018) Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia 2017, Sdki.
Çaypınar, S. S. (2015) ‘Awareness and perceptions of Turkish women towards delivery methods', Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations, 5(2), pp. 173–178. doi: 10.5799/ahinjs.01.2014.02.0385.
Chen, I. et al. (2018) ‘Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section', Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018(9), pp. 1–2. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3.
Cunningham et al. (2018) Williams Obstetrics. 25e edn. New York: Mc Graw Hill Inc.
Declercq, E. (2015) ‘Midwife-attended births in the United States, 1990-2012: Results from revised birth certificate data', Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health, 60(1), pp. 10–15. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12287.
Dinkes Kabupaten Tuban (2018) ‘Profil Kesehatan Kabupaten Tuban Tahun 2017', 53(9), pp. 1689–1699.
Fitrianeti, D. et al. (2018) ‘Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Ibu Hamil Memilih Penolong Persalinan di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Malakopa Kabupaten Kepulauan Mentawai Factors Affecting Pregnant Women Choosing Childbirth attendants in the Work Area of Malakopa Health Center Mentawai Islands Dis', Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pelayanan Kesehatan, 2(3), pp. 153–162. doi: 10.22435/jpppk.v2i3.126.
Hildingsson, I. et al. (2013) ‘Women's satisfaction with antenatal care: Comparing women in Sweden and Australia', Women and Birth. Australian College of Midwives, 26(1), pp. e9–e14. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.06.002.
Kainu, J. . (2011) ‘Persistent Pain After Caesarean and Vaginal Birth', Obstetric Anesthesia Digest, pp. 2–3.
Khudhori (2012) ‘Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Pemilihan Tempat Persalinan Pasien Poloklinik Kandungan dan Kebidanan Rumah Sakit IMC Bintaro', Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat.
Liu, N. H. et al. (2013) ‘Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study.', Reproductive health, 10(1), pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-2.
Martin, J. A. et al. (2018) ‘Births: Final for 2017', National Vital Statistics Reports, 67(8), pp. 1–49. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/Vitalstatsonline.htm.
Mazzoni, A. et al. (2016) ‘Women's preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study', BMC pregnancy and childbirth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16, p. 34. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0824-0.
Naudé, N. et al. (2020) ‘Preference for mode of delivery in a low-risk population in Cape Town, South Africa', European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 254, pp. 259–265. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.028.
Nesbitt, R. C. et al. (2016) ‘The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana', Scientific Reports. Nature Publishing Group, 6(April), pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1038/srep30291.
Northrup, C. (2005) Women's bodies, women wisdom, Bantam. 3rd edn. New York.
Putri, M. D. (2016) ‘Faktor - Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Pemilihan Tempat Persalinan (Studi di Kecamatan Sarolangun Kabupaten Sarolangun, Jambi)', Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat (e-Journal), 4(April), pp. 55–67.
Roberts, C. L. and Nippita, T. A. (2015) ‘International caesarean section rates: The rising tide', The Lancet Global Health. Roberts et al. Open access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-SA, 3(5), pp. e241–e242. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70111-7.
Romauli, S. (2011) Asuhan Kebidanan 1 Konsep Dasar Asuhan Kebidanan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
Serçekuş, P., Egelioglu Cetisli, N. and Inci, F. H. (2015) ‘Birth preferences by nulliparous women and their partners in Turkey', Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, 6(3), pp. 182–185. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2015.03.002.
Stoll, K. et al. (2009) ‘"it's all the rage these days”: University students' attitudes toward vaginal and cesarean birth', Birth, 36(2), pp. 133–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00310.x.
Vogel, J. P. et al. (2015) ‘Use of the robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: A secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys', The Lancet Global Health, 3(5), pp. e260–e270. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X.
Yilmaz, S. D. et al. (2013) ‘Women's preferences of method of delivery and influencing factors', Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 15(8), pp. 683–689. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.11532.
Zinsser, L. A., Stoll, K. and Gross, M. M. (2016) ‘Midwives' attitudes towards supporting normal labour and birth - A cross-sectional study in South Germany', Midwifery. Elsevier, 39, pp. 98–102. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.05.006.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Atribution-Share Alike 4.0 (CC BY-SA).
This Journal (e-ISSN 2656-7806) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
