MODE OF DELIVERY IN THE SECOND PREGNANCY OF MOTHER WITH HIGH MYOPIA AND HISTORY OF SECTIO CESAREAN: A CASE REPORT
Downloads
Background: Pregnant women with a history of cesarean section have problems choosing the delivery method for their next pregnancy. Sometimes there are still other risk factors, one of which is high myopia, which adds to the problem of choosing an effective delivery method with the advantages and disadvantages of each. Continuity of care in midwifery is very important in providing patients insight, knowledge, and support to make decisions about appropriate and safe delivery methods. Case report: A 29-year-old woman G2P1A0 with high myopia (minus 8) and cesarean scar three years ago for indications of high myopia (minus 10). In this second pregnancy, the mother underwent another SC because of high myopia minus 8, and the mother has not had a retinal laser until the present. Patients receive referrals from a primary health center for antenatal care and preparation for delivery at referral health facilities with high-risk pregnancies. Mothers are faced with two choices: TOLAC (Trial Of Labor After Cesarean Delivery) and ERCD (Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery). The mother was consulted by an eye specialist at the referral hospital. The condition of the eye's retina is good from the results of an eye specialist examination. However, it is still necessary to do a retinal laser process as prophylaxis if the mother wants to have a vaginal delivery. In the end, cesarean delivery is the mother's choice. Conclusion: Pregnancies with high myopia and cesarean scars need to receive full support from midwives and families to carry out comprehensive COC care to improve the health of mothers and children by assisting mothers in selecting delivery methods that are effective and safe for both mother and baby.
Chiu H, Steele D, McAlister C, Lam WC. Delivery recommendations for pregnant females with risk factors for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. 2015; 50(1):11-8.
Gotovac M, Kastelan S, Lukenda A. Eye and pregnancy. Coll Antropol. 2013;37(1):189-93.
Iskandar F, Surya R, Sungkar A, Anggriany FD. Kontroversi Persalinan Spontan pada Miopia Tinggi. CDK-291/ vol. 47 no. 10 th. 2020.
Juenemann AM, Nowomiejska K, Oleszczuk A, et al. Mode of delivery and eye diseases. Ginekol Pol. 2012;83:613–17.
Mackensen F, Paulus WE, Max R, Ness T. Ocular changes during pregnancy. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int. 2014; 111(33–34):567–75.
Mohammadi SF, Letafat-Nejad M, Ashrafi E, Delshad-Aghdam H. A survey of ophthalmologists and gynecologists regarding termination of pregnancy and choice of delivery mode in the presence of eye diseases. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017;29:126-32.
Moneta-Wielgos J, Brydak-Godowska J, Golebiewska J, Lipa M, Rekas M. The assessment of retina in pregnant women with myopia. Neuroendocrinol Lett. 2018; 39(4):321-4. DOI 10.1258/shorts.2012.010107.
Ningsih, D.A. (2017). Continuity Of Care Kebidanan. Oksitosin: Jurnal Ilmiah Kebidanan, 2017, 4.2: 67-77
Ophthalmology-Obstetrics Consensus of Polish Society of Ophthalmology. 2014;10:06.
Papamichael E, Aylward GW, Regan L. Obstetric opinions regarding the method of delivery in women that have had surgery for retinal detachment. J R Soc Med Sh Rep. 2012;2:24.
Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4(4):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5. PMID: 27121907; PMCID: PMC8663203.
SapuÅ‚a-Grabowska M, Ciszewska J, Brydak-Godowska J, et al. Delivery in Myopic Women: A Comparison of Mode of Delivery in Years 1990, 2000, and 2010. Med Sci Monit. 2019; 25: 7715–7719.
Sentilhes L, Vayssière C, Beucher G, Deneux-Tharaux C, Deruelle P, Diemunsch P, Gallot D, Haumonté JB, Heimann S, Kayem G, Lopez E, Parant O, Schmitz T, Sellier Y, Rozenberg P, d'Ercole C. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28. PMID: 23810846.
Studsgaard A, Skorstengaard M, Glavind J, Hvidman L, Uldbjerg N. Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica. 2013 Nov;92(11):1256-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12240.
Sitorus RS, Sitompul R, Widyawati S, Bani AP. Buku ajar oftalmologi. Jakarta: Balai Penerbit FKUI; 2017.
Yenerel NM, Küçümen RB. Pregnancy and the eye. TJO. 2015;45(5):213-9.
Copyright (c) 2023 Dian Lestari Hidayah, Farida Fitriana, Andriyanti, Ivon Diah Wittiarika, Ratna Dwi Jayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Atribution-Share Alike 4.0 (CC BY-SA).
This Journal (e-ISSN 2656-7806) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
