Impact of Gross Domestic Product Per Capita and Population on United Arab Emirates Trade Volume

Ethar Hassan; John Atsu Agbolosoo; Rita Nurmalina; Amzul Rifin

doi:10.20473/jde.v10i1.57712

Authors

Ethar Hassan
eythar25@gmail.com
Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Economics and Management, Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) University, Bogor, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0484-9671
John Atsu Agbolosoo Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) University, Bogor, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3532-3099
Rita Nurmalina Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) University, Bogor, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8002-9975
Amzul Rifin Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Economics and Management, Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) University, Bogor, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9910-3939

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025)

Articles

June 28, 2025

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has become a significant global trade hub. Understanding the factors influencing trade flows is crucial for developing effective strategies to promote trade activities and sustain economic growth. This study examines the impact of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita and population size on trade flows in UAE with major trading partners, including China, Germany, Iraq, India, Japan, and Saudi Arabia, by utilizing a fixed-effects gravity model and panel data from 2000 to 2020. A positive relationship was found between the GDP of UAE and trading partners and bilateral trade, and a negative relationship was found between GDP per capita, the population of UAE, and bilateral trade flows. The distance between the capital city of UAE and its trading partners also has a negative effect on bilateral trade flows. This study suggests that trading partners should improve their GDP per capita. The negative impact of the increasing population size of the UAE on bilateral trade flows indicates that the UAE should improve labor quality and skills that may enhance trade growth and economic development and that trade policies between UAE and its trading partners need to address trade barriers and initiate efforts for their eradication to improve bilateral trade. The policy implication is that trade opportunities should be expanded by exploring trade agreements and fostering diversification of export goods to mitigate domestic competition and open new markets.

Abdullahi, N.M., Shahriar, S., Kea, S., Abdullahi, A.M., Zhang, Q. & Huo X. (2021). Nigeria’s cocoa exports: a gravity model approach. Ciência Rural, 51(11), 1-16. https://doi:10.1590/0103-8478cr20201043.

Abidin, I.S.Z. & Haseeb, M. (2018). Malaysia-GCC bilateral trade, macroeconomic indicators and Islamic finance linkages: A gravity model approach. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22,1-7.

Alam, I. & Ahmed, S. (2018). India’s Trade with Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries: A Panel Gravity Model Analysis. Journal of Academic Research in Economics, 10(2), 248-260.

Bakhsh, K., Javed, I., Ashfad, M. & Adil, S.A. (2016). Analysis of agricultural trade between Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates: An application of gravity model. Journal of Agricultural Research, 54(4): 787-799.

Bhattacharya, S. K., & Das, G. G. (2014). Can south-south trade agreements reduce development deficits? An exploration of SAARC during 1995–2008. Journal of South Asian Development, 9(3), 253–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973174114549129

Boulhol, H., de Serres, A., & Molnar, M. (2008). The contribution of economic geography to GDP per Capita. Economic Studies, 2008.

Capoani, L. (2023). Review of the gravity model: Origins and critical analysis of its theoretical development. SN Business & Economics, 3(5), 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00461-0

Dadakas, D., Ghazvini Kor, S., & Fargher, S. (2020). Examining the trade potential of UAE using a gravity model and a Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood estimator. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 29(5), 619–646.

Effendi, Y. (2014). ASEAN Free Trade Agreement Implementation for Indonesian Trading Performance: A Gravity Model Approach. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 8(1):73-92.

Fevriera, S., Marettania, N. & Siwi, V.N. (2021). Hofstede’s cultural dimensions in the gravity model using mixed-effect model. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 24(2), 306–328. https://doi:10.24914/jeb.v24i2.4572.

Jha, S. S., & Tandon, J. K. (2019). A study on the impact of transport and power infrastructure development on the economic growth of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Journal of Management, 6(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.34218/JOM.6.2.2019.003

Khayat, S. H. (2019) A gravity model analysis for trade between the GCC and developed countries. Cogent Economics & Finance, 7:1, 1703440. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1703440

Khayat, S.H. (2022). Bilateral Foreign Direct Investment between GCC Countries and Developed Economies, using a Gravity Model. Business & Economics, 13(6), 1-3.

Kichko, S. (2018). Competition, land price, and city size. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Kumar, S., & Ahmed, S. (2015). Gravity model by panel data approach: An empirical application with implications for South Asian countries. Foreign Trade Review, 50(4):233–249. Available online at https://doi.org/10.1177/0015732515598587

Kumar, N.R., Kumar, G.R., Shafiwu, A.B., & Reddy, J.M. (2024) Trade determinants and opportunities for Indian rice: a dynamic panel gravity model perspective. Cogent Economics & Finance, 12:1, 2312367, https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2024.2312367

Lambrechts, J., Erin, M., & Rule, N. (2012). Does free trade result in higher GDP per capita: An International Perspective. Deakin Papers on International Business Economics, 5, 12. https://doi.org/10.21153/dpibe2012vol5no0art53

Jayasooriya, S.P. (2021). Bayesian Gravity Model for Digitalization on Bilateral Trade Integration in Asia. ADBI Working Paper 1232. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Accessed on 3 May 2024. Available online at https://www.adb.org/publications/bayesian-gravity-model-digitalization-bilateraltrade-integration-asia

Midamba, D.C., Ndolo, O.F., Chepkoech, B., Agbolosoo, J.A., Ouya, F.O. & Jjengo, A. (2025). Data Collection Methods in Social Sciences: A Primer for Novice Researchers and Students. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, 22(6), 217–229.https://doi:10.9734/sajsse/2025/v22i61049.

Munir, K. & Sultan, M. (2015). Export, Import and Total Trade Potential of Pakistan: A Gravity Model Approach. MPRA Paper No. 66621, 1-34. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/66621/

Nazir, M. A., Shahriar, S., Kea, S., Abdullahi, A. M., Zhang, Q., & Huo, X. (2021). Nigeria’s cocoa exports: a gravity model approach. Ci^encia Rural Santa Maria, 51(11):1-16. Available online at https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20201043

Patuelli, R., Linders, G. J. M., Metulini, R., & Griffith, D. A. (2016). The space of gravity: Spatially filtered estimation of a gravity model for bilateral trade. Spatial econometric interaction modeling, 145–169.

Prasai, L. P. (2014). Foreign trade pattern of Nepal: Gravity model approach. NRB Economic Review, 26(1), 24–43.

Prabowo, S. (2021). Determinants and efficiency level of capital goods imports in Indonesia: exploring using gravity models. Jurnalku, 1(3):189-199.

Ristanović, V., Primorac, D., & Kozina, G. (2020). Applying gravity model to analyse trade direction. Technical Gazette, 27(5): 1670–1677. Available one at https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20200217101315

Santosa, B., Subhan, A.R. &Soehharjot. (2021). Bilateral trade flows among g7 member countries and Indonesia: gravity model approach. Media Ekonomi, 29(1):21-36.

Subhan, A.R., Santosa, B. & Soeharjoto, S. (2021). Bilateral trade flows among G7 member countries and Indonesia: Gravity Model Approach. Media Ekonomi, 29(1), 21–36. https://doi:10.25105/me.v29i1.9108.

Tang, C., Rosland, A., Li, J. & Yasmeen, R. (2024). The comparison of bilateral trade between China and ASEAN, China and EU: from the aspect of trade structure, trade complementarity and structural gravity model of trade. Appl Econ. 56(9), 1077–1089. https://doi:10.1080/00036846.2023.2174940.