Editorial Policies

 

FOCUS AND SCOPE

Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam (JEBIS) provides a platform for academics and professionals to share insights through writings on the latest developments and advances in the science and practice of Islamic economics both in theory and practice. JEBIS accommodates various ideas regarding Islamic economics with appropriate research methods. JEBIS also strives to publish quality scientific papers, discussing issues of concern to Islamic economics, Islamic business and Islamic finance, at the National and International levels. The spread of Islamic Economics include (but not limited to): 

1. Islamic Economics and Social Finance 

2. Islamic Business and Halal 

3. Islamic Banking, Finance and Capital Market

 

SECTION POLICIES

ARTICLES

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

JURNAL EKONOMI DAN BISNIS ISLAM

Editors
  • Sylva Rusmita
Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
 

 

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

All received manuscripts will be peer reviewed with the double-blind policy by at least 2 reviewers. The final decision of manuscripts will be made by editor in chief according to reviewers' comments in a forum of the editorial board meeting. Scanning of plagiarism on the manuscripts will be conducted by using Turnitin software.

REVIEW PROCESS:

  1. The manuscript that has been selected by the editorial board will be submitted to the reviewer.
  2. Manuscript review process carried out in a predetermined time period (a maximum of 4 weeks), if need extra time should confirm to the secretariat of the editors. 
  3. During the review process, reviewers follow the style guide scriptwriting 
  4. Reviewers check the substance of the text carefully to get the maening information text.
  5. Reviewers checking the suitability and appropriateness of writing citations with a list of references / bibliography manuscript.
  6. Reviewers noted and recommendations in writing to the improvement of the manuscript authors clearly; 
  7. The results of article reviews will be sent to the Chief Editor or Managing Editor by filling out the Review Form 
 

PUBLICATION FREQUENCY

(JEBIS) Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam is published by University of Airlangga, 2 times every year, on June and December, each edition is 100-500 pages

 

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

JEBIS provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

ARCHIVING

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE

There are no any Article Processing Charges (APC) for all authors of JEBIS including for submission, peer-reviewing, editing, publishing, maintaining and archiving, and allow immediate access to the full-text versions of the article.

However, we provide the hard copy of the journal with an additional fee. To cover the cost of printing, the journals charge IDR 100000 per copy.

 

PLAGIARISM SCREENING

Scanning of plagiarism on the manuscripts will be conducted by using Turnitin software

 

PUBLICATION ETHICS

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam (JEBIS) is open access, peer-reviewed, and scientific journal published by The Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia. The objective of Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam (JEBIS) is to publish original research articles from researchers and practitioners on various topic of Islamics Economics, including research reports, case reports, application of theory, critical studies, and literature reviews. The spread of Islamic Economics include (but not limited to): Islamic Economics and Social FInance, Islamic Banking, Finance and Capital Market, Islamic Business and Halal.

Universitas Airlangga as the publisher of Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam (JEBIS) takes its duties of guardianship over all publishing stages exceptionally seriously, and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or additional commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

 Duties of Authors

  1. Reporting Standards
    Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

  2. Data Access and Retention
    Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review. They should be prepared to provide such data within a reasonable time.

  3. Originality and Plagiarism
    The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

  4. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication
    An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

  5. Acknowledgment of Sources
    Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

  6. Authorship of the Paper
    Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

  7. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
    All authors should disclose any financial or other substantive conflict of interest in their manuscript that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

  8. Fundamental errors in published works
    When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

  9. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
    If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment with any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Duties of Editors

  1. Fair Play
    An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

  2. Confidentiality
    The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

  3. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
    Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the author's express written consent.

  4. Publication Decisions
    The editor board journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the journal's editorial board's policies and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

  5. Review of Manuscripts
    The editor must ensure that the editor for originality initially evaluates each manuscript. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and indicate which parts of the journal are peer-reviewed. The editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.

Duties of Reviewers

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions
    Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

  2. Promptness
    Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

  3. Standards of Objectivity
    Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

  4. Confidentiality
    Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

  5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
    Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

  6. Acknowledgment of Sources
    Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. The relevant citation should accompany any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported. A reviewer should also call the editor's attention to any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper they have personal knowledge of.

 

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

  1. Every manuscript submitted to JEBIS must obey to the policy and terms set by Journal of Economics and Business Islamic.
  2. If the article is accepted for publication, authors continue to retain the copyright to their article and transfer non exclusive publishing rights to the journal. Publication rights on the contents of manuscript published by JEBIS is owned by Journal of Economics and Business Islamic under consent and approval by the corresponding author(s).
  3. Full text of electronic publication of manuscripts can be accessed free if used for the purpose of education and research according to copyright regulation.
  4. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  5. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
  6. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  7. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  8. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.