Comparative Study of Poverty in Indonesia: Multidimensional Poverty And Monetary Poverty
Downloads
Research on poverty has long been done by various methods and approaches. Approach to identifying the poor in general by calculating consumption expenditure or income revenue. The calculation is then known as monetary poverty. Indonesia also use and implemented that approach. However, some experts believe that monetary poverty approach does not capture the whole cause of poverty because the indicator calculation not enough. Though poverty is a multidimensional phenomenon that involves not only the economic aspects but involves other aspects. Using secondary data from Indonesian family Life survey, this study proposes to calculate the multidimensional poverty index and estimates the poor based on two approaches, multidimensional poverty and monetary poverty. Calculating the poverty by alkire foster method, whereas to estimate multidimensional poverty and Monetary Poverty using logistic regression. The Results for Alkire-Foster calculation method show that identify of poor by multidimensional poverty greater than the monetary poverty. Generally, the standard of living dimension contributes most to the multidimensional poverty index. Standard living dimension was believed to be the dimension that explains the nature of households that are directly related to the everyday household behavior. Meanwhile, estimation of monetary poverty shows that variable consumption per capita, the head of the household sector employment, hours of work, household size and household asset ownership affect the identification of poverty. Only education variable is not significant effect on the identification of poverty. Base on those finding, education has two possibilities to affect poverty one significant affect multidimensional poverty, while for monetary hasn't affect.
Alkire, S. (2007). The Missing Dimensions of Poverty Data: An Intoduction. Oxford development studies, 35(4), 347-359.
Alkire, S. (2011). Multidimensional Poverty and Its Discontents. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2118543
Alkire, S. & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and Multidimensional poverty Meassurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 476-478.
Alkire, S., Conconi, A., & Seth, S. (2014). Multidimensional Poverty Index 2014: Brief methodological note and results.
Alkire, S., Foster, J., Seth, S., Santos, M. E., Roche, J. M. dan Ballon, P. (2015). Multidimensional Poverty Measurement and Analysis: Chapter 10- Some Regression Model for AF Measures. Oxford University Press.
Atkinson, A. B. (1989). Poverty and Social Security. NewYork: Harvester Whearsheaf.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2014). Statistik Kemiskinan dalam angka. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Badan Perancanaan dan Pembangunan Nasional (Bappenas). (2008). Kita Suarakan MDGs Demi Pencapaianya di Indonesia. Bappenas.
Belhadj, B. & Limam, M. (2012). Undimensional And Multidimensional Fuzzy Poverty Measures: New Approach. Economic Modelling, 29(4). 995-1002.
Budhiantoro, S., Victoria, F., Wiko, S., Ah, M. & Dwi, R. P. A. (2013). Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI): Konsep dan Pengukurannya di Indonesia. PRAKARSA Economics Policy Working Paper.
Cahyat, A. (2004). Bagaimana Kemiskinan Diukur?. Beberapa Model Penghitungan Kemiskinan di Indonesia (No. CIFOR Governance Brief no.2,p.8p). CIFOR.
Diaz, G. (2003). Multidimensional Poverty. The Wider Conference In Inequality, Poverty And Human Well Being.
Grosh, M. & Glewwe, P. (2000). Designing Household Survey Questionnaires For Developing Countries: Lesson From 15 Years Of The Living Standarts Measurement Study, Volume 2. World Bank.
Kartasasmita, G. (1996). Pembangunan Untuk Rakyat Memadukan Pertumbuhan Dan Pemertaan. CIDES
Laderchi, C. R., Saith, R. & Stewart, F. (2003). Does It Matter That We Do Not Agree On The Definition Of Poverty? A Comparison Of Four Approaches. Oxford development studies, 31(3), 234-274.
Lhatifa, E. (2011). Harmonisasi Kebijakan Pengentasan Kemiskinan di Indonesia yang Berorientasi Pada Milineum Development Goals. Junal Dinamika Hukum, 11(3)
Philip, D. & Ryhan, M. I. (2004). Vulnerability and Poverty: What are the Causes and How They Related?. ZEF Bonn, center for Development Research, Univeristy of Bonn.
Pindyck, R. S. & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2009). Microeconomics, Edisi Ketujuh. Prentice Hall
Rodgers, H. R. (2000). American Poverty in a New Era of Reform. Routledge.
Schiller, B. R. (2001). The Economics of Poverty and Discrimination. Prentice Hall.
Sen, A. (1987). Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Todaro, M. & Smith, S. (2003). Pembangunan Ekonomi di Dunia Ketiga. Edisi Kedepalan. Erlangga.
Tsui, K. Y. (2002). Multidimensional Poverty Indices. Social Choice and Welfare, 19(1), 69-93.
Van Parijs, P. (1992). Arguing for Basic Income. Ethical foundation for a radical reform. Verso.
Wardhana, D. (2010). Multidimensional poverty dynamics in Indonesia (1993-2007). School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
Zhang, H. (2014). The Poverty Trap of Education: Education-Poverty Connections in Western China. Internasional Journal of Education Development, 38, 47-58.
Copyright (c) 2016 Tegar Rismanuar Nuryitmawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JIET (Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan) (p-ISSN: 2541-1470; e-ISSN: 2528-1879) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with JIET (Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan) agree to the following terms:
- The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA).