Analysis The Effect of Electronic Money Use on Velocity of Money: Evidence from Indonesia
Downloads
This study aims to examine the effect of electronic money transactions on the velocity of money in Indonesia. This study uses a quantitative research approach using quarterly time series data for the 2010q1-2018q4 period. Using variable velocity obtained from Gross Domestic Product (GDP) divided by M2, electronic money transactions, GDP per capita, and interest rates using the Error Correction Model (ECM) method. The results show that in the long run variable electronic money transactions, income levels and interest rates are significantly positive. In the short term, interest rates and income levels are significantly positive, while electronic money transactions only have a slight effect on the velocity of money in Indonesia.
Aiba, D. (2018). Foreign Currency Borrowing and Risk-Hedging Behaviors: Evidence from a Household Survey in Cambodia. Journal of Asian Economics, 58, hh.19-35.
Andresen, T. (2013). Improved macreconomic control with electronic money and modern monetary theory. real-world economics review.
Burke, R. R. (2002). Technology and the Customer Interface: What Consumers Want in the Physical and Virtual. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. , 30(4), hh.411-432.
Cardak, B. (2009). The Determinants Of Household Assets Holdings. Journal of banking & Finance, 33(5), hh.850-860.
Dimand, R.W. and Gomez Betancourt, R., (2012). Retrospectives: Irving Fisher's Appreciation and Interest (1896) and the Fisher Relation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(4), hh.185-96.
Durgun, Ö. and Timur, M.C. (2015). The effects of electronic payments on monetary policies and central banks. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195(195).
Fisher, I. (2006). The Purchasing Power Of Money: Its' Determination And Relation To Credit Interest And Crises. New York: Cosimo, Inc.
Friedman, M. (1956). The Quantity Theory of Money: A Restatement. Studies in The Quantity Theory Of Money, 5. Chicago: University of Chicago
Fujiki, H. and Tanaka, M. (2014). Currency demand, new technology, and the adoption of electronic money: Micro evidence from Japan. Economics letters, 125(1), hh.5-8.
Gichuki, C.N. and Mulu-Mutuku, M. (2018), March. Determinants of awareness and adoption of mobile money technologies: Evidence from women micro entrepreneurs in Kenya. In Women's Studies International Forum (Vol. 67, hh. 18-22). Pergamon.
Griffith, R., (2012). Electronic Money and Monetary Policy. Southwestern Economic Proceedings, 31(2), hh.47-56.
Halpin, R. and Moore, R. (2009). Developments in electronic money regulation–the Electronic Money Directive: A better deal for e-money issuers?. Computer Law & Security Review, 25(6), hh.563-568.
Hervé, F., Zouaoui, M. and Belvaux, B., (2019). Noise traders and smart money: Evidence from online searches. Economic Modelling, 83, hh.141-149.
Hidayati, S., Nuryanti, I., Firmansyah, A., Fadly, A., & Darmawan, I. Y. (2006). Operasional e-money. Jakarta, Indonesia: Bank Indonesia.
Humphrey, D.B., Pulley, L.B. and Vesala, J.M., (1996). Cash, paper, and electronic payments: a cross-country analysis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28(4), hh.914-939.
Keynes, J.M., (2018). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. Springer.
Khan, J. and Craig-Lees, M., (2009). ‘Cashless' transactions: perceptions of money in mobile payments. International Business and Economics Review.
Mbiti, I. and Weil, D.N., (2013). The home economics of e-money: velocity, cash management, and discount rates of M- Pesa users. American Economic Review, 103(3), hh.369-74.
Mishkin, F. (2004). The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets. New Jersey: Pearson.
Poon, S. and Chau, P.Y., (2001). Octopus: the growing e-payment system in Hong Kong. Electronic markets, 11(2), hh.97- 106.
Raghubir, P. and Srivastava, J., (2008). Monopoly money: The effect of payment coupling and form on spending behavior. Journal of experimental psychology: Applied, 14(3), p.213.
Ranjan, R.P. and Kar, R., (2014). The Dynamics of Money Velocity, External Sectors and Electronic Transactions in India: Connecting dots using Empirical Approach. Journal of Applied Economics & Business Research, 4(3).
Riley, E., (2018). Mobile money and risk sharing against village shocks. Journal of Development Economics, 135, hh.43-58.
See-To, E.W. and Ngai, E.W., (2018). An empirical study of payment technologies, the psychology of consumption, and spending behavior in a retailing context. Information & Management, 56(3), hh.329-342.
Singh, S., (1999). Electronic money: understanding its use to increase the effectivenes of policy. Telecommunications Policy, 23(10-11), hh.753-773.
Solomon, E., (1999). What should regulators do about consolidation and electronic money?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(2-4), hh.645-653.
Suri, Tavneet & Jack, W. (2016). The Long-Run Poverty and Genderimpacts of Mobile Money. Development Economics, 354(6317), 1288-1292.
Thomas, R.L. (1997). Modern Econometrics an Introduction. New York: Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Zayer, A. H., & Mohammed Al- Tweel, T. T. (2019). The impact of electronic payment systems on the velocity of money circulation.
Zhou, K.Z. and Wu, F. (2010) Technological Capability, Strategic Flexibility, and Product Innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 547-561.
Copyright (c) 2020 Sufi Azhari Pambudi, M. Khoerul Mubin
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JIET (Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan) (p-ISSN: 2541-1470; e-ISSN: 2528-1879) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with JIET (Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan) agree to the following terms:
- The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA).