Does Village Funds Impact on Reducing Poverty and Improving Good Governance Practices?
Downloads
Village fund programs have been implemented fairly well, except in the case of good governance practices need to be continuously strengthened. Teruta is related to the understanding of the village apparatus, especially BPD, against administrative guidelines for program implementation. Moreover, in reality, the village funding program is very much against the good governance practices and the spirit of poverty reduction. So the benefits received from village funding programs for the poor are very small compared to richer communities. Almost in all study villages, there is a decrease in poverty but the role of village funds in the reduction of poverty is not seen significantly by the citizens. Village funding programs are considered more indirect in reducing poverty, by improving public infrastructure to facilitate public access to public facilities. The creation of employment in village fund infrastructure projects is also not enough to help the poor. In addition to the very limited number of days and unnecessary workers from among the poor.
Abumanshur, R., Zuraidi, D., Setyadiharja, R., & Sanopaka, E. (2015). An Evaluation of P3DK ( An Acceleration of Development Village Program ): A Reviewing on Failure toward Revolving Loan Fund System in Kepulauan Riau Province , Indonesia. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169(August 2014), 189–197. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.302
Boonperm, J., Haughton, J., & Khandker, S. R. (2013). Journal of Asian Economics Does the Village Fund matter in Thailand ? Evaluating the impact on incomes and spending. Journal of Asian Economics, 25, 3–16. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2013.01.001
Gradstein, M. (2017). Government decentralization as a commitment. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1), 110–118. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.01.005
Heller, P., & Harilal, K. N. (2007). Building Local Democracy : Evaluating the Impact of Decentralization in Kerala , India. World Development, 35(4), 626–648. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.07.001
Jia, J., Guo, Q., & Zhang, J. (2014). China Economic Review Fiscal decentralization and local expenditure policy in China. China Economic Review, 28(2), 107–122. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.01.002
Kalirajan, K. (2012). Fiscal Decentralization and Development Outcomes in India : An Exploratory Analysis. World Development, 40(8), 1511–1521. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.04.005
Kyriacou, A. P., Muinelo-gallo, L., & Roca-sagalés, O. (2017). Regional inequalities , fiscal decentralization and government quality. Regional Studies, 3404(December), 945–957. http://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1150992
Latifah, N., & Aziz, L. (2016). The Village Autonomy And The Effectiveness Of Village Fund. Penelitian Politik, 13(2), 193–211.
Lewis, B. D. (2015). Decentralising To Villages In Indonesia : Money (And Other ) Mistakes. Public Admin Dev, 35(December), 347–359. http://doi.org/10.1002/pad
Martinez-bravo, M. (2014). The Role of Local Officials in New Democracies : Evidence From Indonesia. American Economic Review, 104(4), 1244–1287.
Olken, B. A. (2007). Monitoring Corruption : Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia. Journal Of Political Economy, 115(2), 200–249.
Park, A., & Wang, S. (2010). Community-based development and poverty alleviation : An evaluation of China í¢€TM s poor village investment program. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9–10), 790–799. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.005
Rao, M. G., Sen, T. K., Jena, P. R., & Jena, P. R. (2008). Issues before the Thirteenth Finance Commission (Decentralisation No. 55). New Delhi.
Sjafrina, A., Primayogha, E. & Ramadhana, K. (2017). Cegah Korupsi Dana Desa. https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/cegah-korupsi-dana-desa.
Sugiarto, S. (2012). Pnpm Perdesaan Evaluasi Dampak. Jakarta: Bappenas.
Usui, N. (2007). Critical Issues Of Fiscal Decentralization (ERD Technical Note).
World Bank. (2004). Making Service Work For Poor People (World Deve). Washington DC. Retrieved from Oxford University Press
World Bank. (2017). Decentralization That Delivers. Jakarta.
Yusuf, N. A. F. (2014). Analisis Pengaruh Desentralisasi Fiskal Terhadap Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Di Kabupaten/Kota Eks Karesidenan Surakarta. Skripsi.
Copyright (c) 2018 Saiful Muhammad Anshori, Achmad Aditama Bukhori
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JIET (Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan) (p-ISSN: 2541-1470; e-ISSN: 2528-1879) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with JIET (Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan) agree to the following terms:
- The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA).
