ChatGPT: Opportunities or Obstacles in College Library Services
Downloads
ChatGPT merupakan teknologi AI, yang dapat diintegrasikan kedalam kegiatan operasional perpustakaan seperti layanan informasi dan processing koleksi seperti katalogisasi. ChatGPT tidak bisa menggantikan peran pustakawan dan perpustakaan sebagai sumber informasi. ChatGPT belum bisa dikatakan sebagai sumber informasi yang valid, maka hasil tanggapannya pun harus diverifikasi kesahihannya.
Ali, J. K. M., Shamsan, M. A. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. A. Q. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on Learning Motivation: Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51
Cox, C., & Tzoc, E. (2023). ChatGPT: Implications for academic libraries. College & Research Libraries News, 84(3), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.84.3.99
Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif dan campuran (3rd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Diwaker, C., Sharma, A., & Tomar, P. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education and Learning. 62–72. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4763-2.ch004
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 00(00), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep421. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036
Iyolita, I., & Nazrul Islam, M. (2023). Opportunities and Challenges of ChatGPT in Academia: A Conceptual Analysis.
Kompas. (2023). ChatGPT Layani 13 Juta Pengguna dalam Sehari. https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2023/02/05/08000027/chatgpt-layani-13-juta-pengguna-dalam-sehari?page=all
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT : How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries ? January. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
Panda, S., & Kaur, N. (2023). Exploring the viability of ChatGPT as an alternative to traditional chatbot systems in library and information centers. Library Hi Tech News, March. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-02-2023-0032
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Sanusi, A. (2016). Metodologi penelitian bisnis. Salemba Empat.
Shiri, A. (2023). ChatGPT and Academic Integrity. SSRN Electronic Journal, January. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4360052
Subaveerapandiyan, A., Vinoth, A., & Tiwary, N. (2023). Netizens, Academicians and Information Professionals ' Opinions About AI With Special Reference To ChatGPT. Library Philosophy and Practice.
UNESCO. (2022). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
Veerakannan, S. (n.d.). ChatGPT and Education : Implications for academic libraries ChatGPT and Education : Implications for academic libraries. 6–10.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike: CC BY-NC-SA
