Implementation of the Doctrine of the Business Judgment Rule on Bankruptcy Law in Indonesia
Downloads
One of the mechanisms that can be taken in resolving accounts payable to a limited liability company in bankruptcy. In the case of bankruptcy due to mistakes made personally by the Board of Directors and the Board of Commissioners, they must be responsible for debts held by limited liability companies. The company law regulates the way for the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners to avoid liability for losses suffered by the company, through the doctrine of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR). In practice, the application of the BJR doctrine in bankruptcy law is characterized by differences in interpretation between law enforcers. Differences in interpretation occur because there is no clear provision in the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Delay of Obligations to Pay Debt (Law No. 37/2004) which limits the filing of bankruptcy applications to the personal Directors and Board of Commissioners. The research in this article is carried out by reform-oriented research methods, to make changes to Law No. 37/2004 to clarify the application of the BJR doctrine in bankruptcy law in Indonesia. With the implementation of legal reform, it is expected that there will be no difference in interpretation regarding the application of the BJR doctrine to bankruptcy law at the Commercial Court in Indonesia.
Downloads
Andika Wijaya, Penanganan Perkara Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Pembayaran Secara Praxis (Citra Aditya Bakti 2017).
Andrew Keay and Joan Loughrey, ‘The Concept of Business Judgment' (2019) 39 Legal Studies.
Bernard S. Sharfman, ‘The Importance of the Business Judgment Rule' (2017) 14 New York University Journal of Law and Business LINK.
Fred. B.G. Tumbuan, Himpunan Mengenai Beberapa Produk Legislasi Dan Masalah Hukum Di Bidang Hukum Perdata (Gramedia Pustaka Utama 2017).
John Y. Campbell, ‘Predicting Financial Distress and the Performance of Distressed Stocks' (2010) IX Journal of Investment Management of Harvard University.
Julia Kagan, ‘Voluntary Bankruptcy' (2018) LINK accessed 27 February 2019.
Kartini Muljadi and Gunawan Widjaja, Pedoman Menangani Perkara Kepailitan (Raja Grafindo Persada 2005).
Kurniawan, ‘Tanggung Jawab Direksi Dalam Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas' (2012) 24 Mimbar Hukum LINK.
Law Number 37 the Year 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (The Republic of Indonesia State Gazette Year 2004 Number 131, Annotation 4443).
Law Number 40 the Year 2007 Concerning Limited Liability Company (The Republic of Indonesia State Gazette Year 207 Number 106, Annotation 4756).
Lori McMillan, ‘The Business Judgment Rule as an Immunity Doctrine' (2013) 4 William & Mary Business Law Review.
M. Hadi Shubhan, Hukum Kepailitan : Prinsip, Norma, Dan Praktik Di Pengadilan (Kencana 2015).
M.N. Purwosutjipto, Pengertian Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia 8 : Perwasitan, Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Pembayaran (Djambatan 1992).
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Himpunan Putusan Yang Telah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap (Judge Made Law) Dalam Bidang Khusus Perkara Kepailitan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia (Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia 2010).
Munir Fuady, Doktrin-Doktrin Modern Dalam Corporate Law Dan Eksistensinya Dalam Hukum Indonesia (Citra Aditya Bakti 2014).
Nindyo Pramono, ‘Beauty Contest Sebagai Business Judgement versus Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat' (Hukum Online, 2012) LINK accessed 21 February 2019.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Kencana 2011).
Rudhy A. Lontoh, Penyelesaian Utang Piutang Melalui Pailit Atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Alumni 2001).
Rudhy Prasetya, Perseroan Terbatas Teori Dan Praktik (Sinar Grafika 2014).
Sartika Nanda Lestari, ‘Business Judgment Rule Sebagai Immunity Doctrine Bagi Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara Di Indonesia' (2015) 8 Notarius.
Siti Hapsah Isfardiyana, ‘Business Judgement Rule Oleh Direksi Perseroan' (2017) 2 Panorama Hukum.
Suroso, ‘Investasi Pada Perusahaan Yang Menghadapi Financial Distres' (2006) XXXV Manajemen Usahawan Indonesia.
Supreme Court PK Decision Number 01 PK/N/2004 dated March 23, 2004.
Yahya Harahap, Hukum Perseroan Terbatas (Sinar Grafika 2013).
