Post Conditionally Unconstitutional of Job Creation Law: Quo Vadis Legal Certainty?
Downloads
Enigma emerged when the Constitutional Court declared that Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation (UU CK) unconstitutional. The purpose of this legal research is to review the legal dynamics of the UU CK after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 based on the point of view of the formal review and procedural justice, as well as reviewing the relevance of the Decision as a monumental decision; while at the same time analyzing the phenomenon of 'conditionally unconstitutional' in the perspective of legal certainty and expediency. This legal research uses a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. The legal materials of this legal research consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and non-legal materials. The study results stated that the Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 is not a monumental decision, considering an omission of "freeze" norms from the UU CK. Meanwhile, if it is studied based on procedural justice and the conception of a formal review, then the UU CK should be null and void by law. Then, 'Constitutional Conditional' in the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 provides legal chaos. There is a contradiction that the UU CK is declared not legally binding as a consequence of 'formal defects' from the process of forming the UU CK. Thus, the suggestion from the researcher is that the government can ratify a standard rule in the law regarding the formation of legislation regarding the construction of an omnibus law scheme.
Downloads
Adams-Prassl A and Adams-Prassl J, ‘Systemic Unfairness, Access to Justice and Futility: A Framework' (2020) 40 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies.
Agustiyani, ‘Airlangga: Aturan Turunan UU Cipta Kerja Tetap Berlaku' (katadata.co.id, 2021).
Anggono BD, Perkembangan Pembentukan Undang Undang Di Indonesia (Penerbit Konstitusi Press 2014).
””, ‘Tertib Jenis, Hierarki, Dan Materi Muatan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan:Permasalahan Dan Solusinya' (2018) 47 Masalah-Masalah Hukum.
””, ‘Omnibus Law Sebagai Teknik Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Peluang Adopsi Dan Tantangannya Dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia' (2020) 9 Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.
Anggono BD and Firdaus FR, ‘Omnibus Law in Indonesia: A Comparison to the United States and Ireland' (2020) 7 Lentera Hukum.
Asshiddiqie J, Perkembangan Baru Tentang Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Dalam Teori Praktik (Genta Publishing 2018).
””, Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Di Negara Hukum (Konstitusi Press 2020)
Beyleveld D And Brownsword R, ‘The Practical Difference Between Natural-Law Theory And Legal Positivism' (1985) 5 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies.
Biernat T, ‘On the Lawmaking Policy, Discretion and Importance of the Rule of Law Standards' (2020) 29 Studia Iuridica Lublinensia.
Brown BF, ‘The Definition of Law' (1960) 34 New Scholasticism.
Castro HA, ‘The Legal Construction of Power in Deliberative Governance' (2020) 45 Law & Social Inquiry.
Chandranegara IS, ‘Pengadopsian Mekanisme Fast-Track Legislation Dalam Pengusulan Rancangan Undang-Undang Oleh Presiden' (2021) 21 Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure.
Cheung EN, ‘Considerations for Closing the Moral and Legal Gap in Public Utility Regulation' (2020) 40 Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary.
Chroust A-HC, ‘Natural Law and Legal Positivism' (1952) 13 Ohio State Law Journal.
Crisp R and Pummer T, ‘Effective Justice' (2020) 17 Journal of Moral Philosophy.
Edlin DE, ‘The Sovereignty of Positivism' (2021) 12 Jurisprudence 347Eskridge WN and Frickey PP, ‘The Making of "The Legal Process”' (1994) 107 Harvard Law Review.
Flanagan B and Hannikainen IR, ‘The Folk Concept of Law: Law Is Intrinsically Moral' [2020] Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
García-Salmones Rovira M, ‘What Is Positivism Today?' (2020) 114 AJIL Unbound.
Gillen J, ‘Striking the Balance of Fairness and Inclusion: The Future of Women's Sports After the Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Bostock v.
Clayton County,GA' (2021) 28 Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal.
Glazebrook S, ‘What Makes a Leading Case? The Narrow Lens of the Law or a Wider Perspective?' (2010) 41 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review.
Hale RL, ‘Unconstitutional Conditions and Constitutional Rights' (1935) 35 Columbia Law Review.
Harijanti SD, ‘Catatan Terhadap Putusan MK Tentang Uji Formil UU CK' (Universitas Padjajaran, 2021).
Hart HLA, ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals' (1958) 71 Harvard Law Review.
Hatzistavrou A and others (eds), The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart Legal, Political and Moral Philosophy (OUP Oxford 2008).
Indonesia C, ‘Poin-Poin Kontroversial Omnibus Law' (cnnindonesia.com, 2020).
Indrayana D and others, ‘Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Atas Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja: Konsekuensi Dan Antisipasinya' (2021).
Insole CJ, Kant and the Divine: From Contemplation to the Moral Law (Oxford University Press 2020).
Isra S, Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia (1st edn, PT RajaGrafindo Persada 2019).
Itodo OG, ‘H.L.A Hart on Legal Positivism: Implications for Contemporary Nigerian Legal' (2021) 1 Journal of International Relations Security and Economic Studies.
Kaye T, ‘Natural Law Theory and Legal Positivism: Two Sides of the Same Practical Coin?' (1987) 14 Journal of Law and Society.
Kelly PJ, ‘Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice: The Civil Law and the Foundations of Bentham's Economic Thought' (1989) 1 Utilitas.
Kelsen H, ‘On The Pure Theory of Law' (1966) 1 Israel Law Review
Laptev V and Fedin V, ‘Legal Awareness in a Digital Society' (2020) 8 Russian Law Journal.
Letwin SR, ‘Morality and Law' (1989) 2 Ratio Juris
Li R, ‘Public Participation and Its Limits in Legislative Consultation: A Case
Study on Local Legislation in China' (2019) 7 The Theory and Practice of Legislation.
Lim E, ‘Of "Landmark” or "Leading” Cases: Salomon 's Challenge' (2014) 41 Journal of Law and Society.
Lumb RD, ‘Natural Law and Legal Positivism' (1959) 11 Journal of Legal Education.
Lyons D and Dworkin R, ‘Principles, Positivism, and Legal Theory' (1977) 87 The Yale Law Journal.
Mackenzie C, Meyerson D and MacDermott T (eds), Procedural Justice and Relational Theory: Empirical, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives (Taylor & Francis 2021).
Manan B and Harijanti SD, Memahami Konstitusi: Makna Dan Aktualisasi (Rajawali Pers 2014).
Marzuki PM, Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi (13th edn, KENCANA 2017).
Mendes CH, Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy (Oxford University Press 2015).
Mindus P and Spaak T (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism (Cambridge University Press 2021).
Mitrophanous E, ‘Soft Positivism' (1997) 17 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies.
Moll WL and Stammler R, ‘The Theory of Justice' [1926] Harvard Law Review.
Nagin DS and Telep CW, ‘Procedural Justice and Legal Compliance' (2020) 19 Criminology & Public Policy.
Nalla MK and Gurinskaya A, ‘Introduction to the Special Issue: Legitimacy and Procedural Justice Issues in Criminal Justice' (2020) 44 International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice.
Parpworth N, Constitutional and Administrative Law (11th edn, Oxford University Press 2020).
Patterson D, ‘Theoretical Disagreement, Legal Positivism, and Interpretation' (2018) 31 Ratio Juris.
Priel D, ‘The Place of Legitimacy in Legal Theory' (2011) 57 McGill Law Journal.
””, ‘The Possibility of Naturalistic Jurisprudence' [2017] Revus.
””, ‘Law as a Social Construction and Conceptual Legal Theory' (2019) 38 Law and Philosophy.
Rizqo KA, ‘Jokowi: UU Ciptaker Tetap Berlaku, Tak Ada Satu Pasal Pun Dibatalkan MK' (news.detik.com, 2021).
Robilant A Di, ‘Genealogies of Soft Law' (2006) 54 The American Journal of Comparative Law.
Röhl KF and Machura S (eds), Procedural Justice (Taylor & Francis 2019).
Rozie F, ‘Pertama Kali Kabulkan Uji Formil, MK Sebut UU Ciptaker Cacat' (Liputan6.com, 2021).
Satriawan I, ‘Pro-Kontra Putusan MK' (Pusat Kajian Konstitusi dan Pemerintahan Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, 2021).
Sebok AJ, ‘Misunderstanding Positivism' (1995) 93 Michigan Law Review.
Shalihah NF, ‘Aksi Demo Penolakan Omnibus Law UU Cipta Kerja Di 9 Daerah Berlangsung Ricuh, Mana Saja?' (Kompas.com, 2020).
Shidarta S, ‘Bernard Arief Sidharta: Dari Pengembanan Hukum Teoretis Ke Pembentukan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia' (2020) 3 Undang: Jurnal Hukum.
Starr WC, ‘Law and Morality in H.L.A.Hart's Legal Philosophy' (1984) 67 Marquette Law Review.
Stone M, ‘Legal Positivism As An Idea About Morality' (2011) 61 The University of Toronto Law Journal.
Sullivan KM, ‘Unconstitutional Conditions' (1989) 102 Harvard Law Review.
Sullivan SP, ‘Powers, but How Much Power? Game Theory and the Nondelegation Principle' [2018] Virginia Law Review.
Susanto VY, ‘Sidang Uji Formil, Ahli Sebut Pembentukan UU Cipta Kerja Tidak Cacat Formil' (nasional.kontan.co.id, 2021).
Thompson JC, ‘Law's Autonomy and Moral Reason' (2019) 8 Laws.
Ulum MB, ‘Indonesian Democracy and Political Parties After Twenty Years of Reformation: A Contextual Analysis' (2020) 10 Indonesia Law Review.
Waluchow W, ‘In Pursuit of Pragmatic Legal Theory' (2002) 15 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence.
Waluchow WJ, ‘The Many Faces of Legal Positivism' (1998) 48 The University of Toronto Law Journal.
Wexler S, ‘The Moral Confusions in Positivism, Utilitarianism and Liberalism' (1985) 30 The American Journal of Jurisprudence.
Zander M, The Law-Making Process (1st edn, Bloomsbury Publishing 2020).
МоÑкаленко ОМ, ‘The Concept of Legal System in The Theory and Philosophy of Law: From Utilitarianism to Positivism' [2020] Problems of Legality
Copyright (c) 2022 A'an Efendi, Fradhana Putra Disantara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
