Elimination of Discrimination Against Women & CEDAW: to What Extent is it Jus Cogens?
The international community gathers on occasion to try and achieve specific purposes, through the development of a system of guidance, norms and regulations for States to observe, commonly called international law. There have been many achievements by the international community working together for the collective interests of the States, for example through the creation of human rights law. Many international treaties have been passed that bind the States to achieve the desired collective purposes. One of these is the Convention on The Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, which departs from the fundamental norms set by the United Nations Charter as well as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights about equality between the rights of men and women for their dignity and freedom. However, several States that are party to the Convention have reserved some of the articles, and there is some controversy around it. Therefore, it is the purpose of this article to analyse whether the concept of eliminating discrimination against women and the values and norms contained in CEDAW can be categorised as Jus Cogens norms, in view of the fact that it is a manifestation of the human rights values agreed upon by the international community. Moreover, this article will also analyse the Convention’s implications on domestic norms in States with significant reservations to the Convention.
Amnesty International, ‘Reservations to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women: Weakening the Protection of Women from Violence in the Middle East and North Africa Region’ (2004).
‘Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969’.
‘Article 7 of the Convention on the Eliminations of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women’.
Fattah V, ‘Hak Asasi Manusia Sebagai Jus Cogens Dan Kaitannya Dengan Hak Atas Pendidikan’ (2017) 32 Yuridika.
Gülgeç YB, ‘The Problem of Jus Cogens from a Theoretical Perspective’ (Ankara Universitesi 2017).
Jenefsky A, ‘Permissibility of Egypt’s Reservations to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women’ (1991) 15 Md. J. Int’l L. & Trade.
McKean W, Equality and Discrimination Under International Law. (Oxford; Clarendon Press 1983).
Muhammadin FM, ‘Seputar Jus Cogens’  International Law <https://fajrimuhammadin.staff.ugm.ac.id/2015/10/01/seputar-jus-cogens/>.
Nieto-Navia R, ‘International Peremptory Norms (Jus Cogens) and International Humanitarian Law’, Man’s Inhumanity to Man (Brill Nijhoff 2003).
‘Preamble of the Convention on the Eliminations of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women’.
‘Preamble of the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights’.
‘Principles of Non-Discrimination and Equality, Australian Human Rights Commission’ (2000).
Putri NK and others, ‘Determinants of Out-of-District Health Facility Bypassing in East Java, Indonesia’ (2021) 13 International Health 545 <https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85122339067&doi=10.1093%2Finthealth%2Fihaa104&partnerID=40&md5=ebaefaca89eeb8aa74ae970b9545ec72>.
Romadhona MK, Subagyono BSA and Agustin D, ‘Examining Sustainability Dimension in Corporate Social Responsibility of ExxonMobil Cepu: An Overview of Socio-Cultural and Economic Aspects’ (2022) 3 Journal of Social Development Studies.
Saraswati AAAN, ‘Kriteria Untuk Menentukan Hak Asasi Manusia Sebagai Â€ ŒJus Cogensâ€ Dalam Hukum Internasional’ (2017) 10 Arena Hukum.
Sellers PV, ‘Jus Cogens: Redux’ (2022) 116 American Journal of International Law.
Sunyowati D and others, ‘Can Big Data Achieve Environmental Justice?’ (2022) 19 Indonesian Journal of International Law.
Copyright (c) 2023 Rr Kunti Dewi Adriane Kusumowardono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.