Responsibilities of Medical Practice through Digital Health Platforms
Downloads
Medical practice through digital health platforms is one of the innovations in the health sector that changes the practice of medicine in a modern direction with technological intermediaries. Digital health platforms accommodate doctors in providing medical services to patients virtually. Certain parties may experience the disadvantages of using technology as a result of limitations that surround medical practice through digital health platforms. The laws have not yet provided specific arrangements related to the medical practice through digital health platforms. This research aims to provide legal certainty by identifying and analyzing the limits of liability of the parties involved in medical practices through digital health platforms. This legal research uses a statutory approach and conceptual approach. The results showed that the imposition of liability for losses suffered by a particular party is based on the element of error inherent in the party that caused the loss. Platform operators are responsible for the leakage of a patient's personal data and medical records. Doctors are responsible for misdiagnosis and prescribing of drugs after the patient provides correct health information. The courier delivery is responsible for ensuring the medicine reaches the patient from the pharmacy according to the prescription given by the doctor. The electronic payment company must solve the transfer of funds problem and the insurances responsible for taking care on insurances needs if the patient connects the treatment with their insurance.
Downloads
Adriano, ‘Menguji Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi' (2013) 28 Yuridika.
Aprilianto S, ‘Peran Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia (MKDKI) Terhadap Dugaan Kelalaian Medis Dokter' (2015) 30 Yuridika.
Budiyanti RT and Herlambang PM, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Pasien Dalam Layanan Konsultasi Kesehatan Online' (2021) 01 Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik.
Didik Endro Purwoleksono, Hukum Pidana (Airlangga University Press 2014).
EM S and N S, ‘One Hundred Years of Telemedicine: Does This New Technology Have a Place in Paeddiatrics?' (2006) 91 Arch Dis Child.
Fatmawati, Peran Telemedicine Bagi Tenaga Kesehatan Di Era New Normal (Insan Cendekia Mandiri 2021).
Hartini T, ‘Legal Policy of Protection COVID-19 Patients in Hospitals' (2022) 2 Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System.
Isfandyarie A, Tanggung Jawab Hukum Dan Sanksi Bagi Dokter (Prestasi Pustaka 2006).
Ishaq, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum (Sinar Grafika 2009).
Muhammad MO and Nugroho LD, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengguna Aplikasi E-Commerce Yang Terdampak Kebocoran Data Pribadi' (2021) 14 Jurnal Pamator.
Nasution BJ, Hukum Kesehatan Pertanggungjawaban Dokter (PT Rineka Cipta 2005).
Oktavira BA, ‘Langkah Hukum Jika Dokter Salah Diagnosis Dalam Pengobatan' (HukumOnline.com, 2022).
Prasetyo A and Prananingrum DH, ‘Disrupsi Layanan Kesehatan Berbasis Telemedicine: Hubungan Hukum Dan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pasien Dan Dokter' (2022) 6 Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.
Prawiroharjo P, Pratama P and Librianty N, ‘Layanan Telemedis Di Indonesia: Keniscayaan, Risiko, Dan Batasan Etika' (2019) 3 Jurnal Etika Kedokteran Indonesia.
Sidharta, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia (Grasindo 2006).
Syafruddin and Anand G, ‘Urgensi Informed Consent Terhadap Perlindungan Hak-Hak Pasien' (2015) 1 Hasanuddin Law Review.
Syafruddin and Arif Rohman, ‘Model Perlindungan dan Pemenuhan Hak Pasien Terhadap Pelayanan Informed Consent di Indonesia', (2019) 31 Jurnal Mimbar Hukum.
Yudhanto Y, Information Technology Business Start-Up (PT Elex Media Komputindo 2018).
Yuliana NLD and Bagiastra IN, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pasien Yang Menderita Kerugian Akibat Salah Mendiagnosis Dalam Layanan Kesehatan Online' (2021) 10 Jurnal Kertha Wicara.
Copyright (c) 2024 Wella Mareta Nanda, Prilian Cahyani, Mohamed Ali El Fetouhi Abarran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
