PRINSIP-PRINSIP HUKUM TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA PENGHINAAN DAN PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DALAM PERPSPEKTIF PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA

Nanda Yoga Rohmana

= http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i1.4831
Abstract views = 1085 times | views = 1031 times

Abstract


International Convention on both the UDHR and ICCPR which guarantee the right of freedom of speech and protection of one's honor and good name. While the Constitution has also guaranteed by Article 28E, 28F and 28G. In the rate level the Act still contained their conflict of law rules among specific law, but it also contained vagueness of the rule of law contained in Article 27 paragraph 3 of the Act ITE and Articles 310 and 311 of the Criminal Code that do not reflect the lex certa and lex scripta. Although there have been special criminal eraser reasons contained in Article 310 paragraph 3 Penal Code in the form of a defense of necessity and in the public interest, but in theory difficult to apply because of lack of the concept of the special criminal eraser reasons. In addition, there is a void laws that have not been regulated in the Indonesian national law as a reason for a special criminal eraser. Legal issues discussed are ) The offenses insult and defamation in terms of the principles and laws of human rights, 2 Formulation of law and/or construction law related criminal offenses insult and defamation in order to balance the protection of freedom of speech and respect the individual's good name. 


Keywords


Crime of Insult and Defamation; a Criminal Law Principle Reason Eraser Particular; the Protection of Freedom of Expression or Speech and Respect for the Honor and Reputation of Others.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Adami Chazawi, Hukum Pidana Positif Penghinaan (Bayumedia Publishing 2013).

Adami Chazawi dan Ardi Ferdian, Tindak Pidana Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik, Penyerangan Terhadap Kepentingan Hukum Dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (Media Nusa Creative 2015).

Aliansi Nasional Reformasi KUHP, Jangan Sekali-Sekali Menerjemahkan Pasal 310 Itu Delik Pers (Aliansi Nasional Reformasi, 2008).

D.Schaffmeister, N. Keijzer dan E.P.H Sutorius, Hukum Pidana (Penerjemah : J.E Sahetapy ed, Liberty 1995).

Hamdan, Politik Hukum Pidana (Grafindo Persada 1997).

Hilaire McCoubrey dan Nigel D.White, Text Book On Jurisprudence (Blackstone Press Limited 1996).

Komarudin Anggara, [et.,al.], Menimbang Ulang Pasal 27 Ayat 3 UU ITE Dalam Putusan Pengadilan (Institute For Criminal Justice Reform 2016).

Lembaga Article 19, Mendefinisikan Pencemaran Nama Baik: Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Kebebasan Berekspresi Dan Perlindungan Atas Reputasi, Article 19 Global Campaign for Free Expression (Seri Standard International 2000).

P.A.F Lamintang, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Citra Aditya Bakti 1997).

Satochid Kartanegara, Diktat, Hukum Pidana II Delik-Delik Tertentu, Balai Lektur Mahasiswa ([s.n] 2010).

Soenarto Soerodibroto, KUHAP Dan KUHP Dilengkapi Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung Dan Hoge Raad (Raja Grafindo 1994).

Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Tindak Pidana Tertentu Di Indonesia (Refika Aditama 2003).

Jurnal

Woerjaningsih, ‘Problematik Pelaksanaan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Hadapan Hukum Pidana’ (1996) XI Yuridika.

Perundang-undangan

Undang-Undang RI No 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 50/PUU-VI/2008 Tentang Pengujian Pasal 27 ayat 3 Undang-Undang RI No 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Yuridika

Yuridika (ISSN: 0215-840X | e-ISSN: 2528-3103) by http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/YDK/index under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statcounter :

View My Stats

Yuridika has been indexed by:

 

Yuridika Official Partner :

 

Full Indexed Service