PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI RAKYAT AKIBAT TINDAKAN FAKTUAL PEMERINTAH
Downloads
The research reveals that The Act No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration demonstrates the existence of effort to provide a legal protection by requiring the present of clear and legal laws as the base of every government’s acts taken (bestuurs handelingen). This includes providing the chance and way to litigation process for the people who suffer of loss caused by the government’s acts. Especially on the administrative dispute that appears as the result of government’s real act (feitelijke handelingen), transforms its ruling into the Article 85 on the transfer of “onrechmatige overheidsdaad” dispute resolution from the public court into the administrative court, the Article 22 and the Article 29 on the decision/act of discretion, and also the Article 87 letter a on factual act as the expansion element of administrative decision. Consequently, the administrative court has the authority to judge the administrative dispute that appears as the result of government’s real act (feitelijke handelingen) which is only limited to legality testing and not to sue on the basis ofcompensation. It is firmly connected in determining where the legal responsibility lies towards the aggrieved people; whether the compensation becomes the rank responsibility/liability (on the basis of faute de service) or personal responsibility/liability (on the basis of faute de personelle) from the relevant government official.
Downloads
Buku
A.D. Belifante, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Usaha Negara (Binacipta 1983).
Agussalim Andi Gadjong, Pemerintahan Daerah, Kajian Politik Dan Hukum (Ghalia Indonesia 2007).
E. Fernando M. Manullang, Legisme, Legalitas Dan Kepastian Hukum (Prenada Media Group).
E. Utrecht, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Republik Indonesia (Pustaka Tinta Mas 1986).
Hans Kelsen, Pengantar Teori Hukum (Nusa Media 1996).
Indroharto, Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Administrasi Pemerintahan, Buku I, Beberapa Pengertian Dasar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara (Pustaka Sinar Harapan 1993).
——, Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Buku I Beberapa Pengertian Dasar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara) (Pustaka Sinar Harapan 1993).
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Prihal Undang Undang (Raja Grapindo Persada 2011).
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi, Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan (Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi).
Paulus Effendi Lotulung, Beberapa Sistem Tentang Kontrol Segi Hukum Terhadap Pemerintah (Citra Aditya Bakti 1993).
——, Lintasan Sejarah Dan Gerak Dinamika Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PERATUN) (Salemba Humanika 2013).
Philipus M. Hadjon, Kaitan Hukum Administrasi Dan Tata Naskah Dinas (Universitas Airlangga Surabaya).
——, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Di Indonesia (Peradaban 2007)
Philipus M. Hadjon,[et.al], Hukum Administrasi Dan Good Governance (Universitas Trisakti 2010).
——, Hukum Administrasi Dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Gadjah Mada University Press 2011).
Philipus M. Hadjon,[et.al] I, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia (Gadja Mada University Press 2008).
S.F. Marbun dan Mahpud MD, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara (Liberty).
Sadjijono, Memahami Hukum Kepolisian (Laksbang Presindo 2010).
Soehino, Asas-Asas Hukum Pemerintahan (Liberty 1984).
Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, ‘Perizinan Sebagai Instrumen Yuridis Dalam Pelayanan Publik’, Pengukuan Jabatan Guru Besar dalam bidang hukum administrasi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga (Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga 2007).
Jurnal
Oheo K Harris, ‘Good Governance (Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Yang Baik) Dalam Pemberian Ijin Oleh Pemerintah Daerah Di Bidang Pertambangan’ (2015) 30 Yuridika.
