PENETAPAN TERSANGKA SEBAGAI OBYEK PRAPERADILAN

Ely Kusumastuti

= http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i1.7258
Abstract views = 551 times | views = 534 times

Abstract


Background of this article is the legal uncertainty after the Constitutional Court (MKRI) verdict No. 2/PUU-XII / 2014 on April 28, 2015 which has added pre-trial object with the determination of suspects, foreclosures and searches. The legal issues of this article are the philosophical foundation of the pre-trial, ratio decidendi of pre-trial verdict related to the determination of suspects and ratio decidendi of Constitutional Court (MKRI) Verdict No. 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 on April 28, 2015. This discussion and analysis of this article are the statutory, conceptual, comparative and case approaches. The conclusions of this article are: First, the pretrial philosophical foundation is to provide human rights protection in the use of forceful efforts by investigators and prosecutors. Second, the ratio decidendi pretrial verdict on behalf of  Budi Gunawan and the Verdict of Constitutional Court (MKRI) No. 21/PUU-XII/2014, April 28, 2015 which has decided determination of suspect as objects of pretrial, has shifted from philosophy of pretrial in the Criminal Code and not  according to the principles of fairness, certainty and expediency. The authority of the Pretrial Institution in the Criminal Procedure Code only examines the procedural truth in this case the investigator’s and prosecutor’s actions, while to examine the material truth related to the suspect’s acts is the absolute authority of the case  trial session. 


Keywords


Determination of The Suspect; Pre-trial; Pre-trial Verdict.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Sinar Grafika 2002).

Darwan Prinst, Praperadilan Dan Perkembangannya Di Dalam Praktik (1st edn, Citra Aditya Bhak 1993).

Didik Endro Purwoleksono, Hukum Acara Pidana (Airlangga University Press 2015) .

Johnny Ibrahim, Teori Dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Banyumedia 2007).

Loebby Loqman, Praperadilan Di Indonesia (Ghalia Indonesia 1984).

M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP

(Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi Dan Peninjauan Kembali) (2nd edn, Sinar Grafika 2000).

——, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP, Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan (2nd edn, Sinar Grafika 2003).

Oemar Seno Adji, Hukum Hakim Pidana (1980).

Peter Mamud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Kencana 2006).

Syukri Akub, Wawasan Due Procces of Law Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Rangkang Education 2012).

Jurnal

Didik Endro Purwoleksono, ‘Jenis-Jenis Upaya Paksa Yang Dapat Dilakukan Oleh Aparat Kepolisian Berdasarkan KUHAP’ (1996) XI Yuridika.

——,‘Pihak Ketiga Dalam Proses Praperadilan’ (2000) 15 Yuridika.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Yuridika

Yuridika (ISSN: 0215-840X | e-ISSN: 2528-3103) by http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/YDK/index under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statcounter :

View My Stats

Yuridika has been indexed by:

Yuridika Official Partner :

 

Full Indexed Service