Authorities of Preparation and Hospitality of Applications for Post-Conditions Post-Decision of Constitutional Court
Downloads
The objective of Pre-Trial is basically to provide justice rights protection from abuse of power and the arbitrary actions of law enforcement officers. Pre-Trial is as the guard for the realization of due process of law. Hence, its authority is not limited to Article 77 of the Criminal Law Procedural Code and the decision of Constitutional Court No.21/PUU-XII/2014. The dismissal of Pre-Trial appeal as provided for in article 82 paragraph (1) sub-paragraph d of the Criminal Law Procedural Code and the decision of the Constitutional Court No.102/PUU-XII/2015 do not have a sufficient rational basis. Pre-Trial and principal case examination should not terminate each other. Conversely, the result of Pre-Trial will be used as a reference to analyze whether evidence used in the principal case examination is conducted properly or not. Thus, when a Pre-Trial examination is underway, the chief of a judge of the district court must adjourn the principal review of his case.
Downloads
Constitutional Court Decision Number 34/PUU-XI/2013 dated March 6 2014.
Constitutional Court Number 102/PUU-XIII/2015.
Bastionto Nugroho, ‘Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut KUHAP’ (2017) 32 Yuridika LINK.
Gustav Radbruch, ‘Statutory Lawlessness and Supra- Statutory Law’ (2006) 26 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies LINK.
Lawrence M. Friedman, ‘Roads to Democracy’ (2005) 33 Syracuse J. Int’l L. & Com.
M. King, A Framework of Criminal Justice (Croom Helm 1981).
M Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP (Sinar Grafika 2009).
Marcus Priyo Gunarto, ‘Asas Keseimbangan Dalam Konsep Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana’ (2012) 24 Mimbar Hukum LINK.
Rhonda Wasserman, Procedural Due Process: A Reference Guide to the United State Constitution (Santa Barbara : Greenwood Publishing Group 2004).
Umi Enggarsasi, ‘Dasar Dan Prosedur (Kajian Terhadap Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana)’ (2004) 19 Perspektif LINK.
