Third Party’s Asset Confiscation in Corruption Crime

Supardi Supardi

= http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i3.8427
Abstract views = 874 times | downloads = 358 times

Abstract


The article is intended to analyze and find the idea of legal philosophy foundation  and develop the concept of proceeds confiscation of corruption crime are enjoyed by a third party, and find the ratio decidendi some of the verdicts related to asset confiscation to a third party without prior seizure, compared with asset confiscation that preceded seizure at the level of investigation. The article found three findings. First, the philosophy foundation of asset confiscation  against third parties is in order to maximize the return of state losses due to corruption. Second, the ratio decidendi verdicts related to assets confiscation to a third party without prior seizure, such that verdicts were not contrary to th laws, human rights and justice. The interpretation of the provisions of Article 19 in conjunction with Article 18 of Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Criminal as amended by Law Number 20 Year 2001 provides an opportunity asset confiscation  to a third party as long as  the third party is not good manner.  Third, to find advice  for legal reform of the provisions regarding  on confiscation to third party in corruption crime in order  that is not touch  with the third party’s rights as  a subjek of asset confiscation.

Keywords


Asset Confiscation; The Third Party; Seizure; Bad Faith.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adrian Siutet, Implementasi Hukum Atas Sumber Pembiayaan Daerah Dalam Kerangka Otonomi Daerah (Penerbit Sinar Grafika 2009).

Arief Sidharta, Meuwissen Tentang Pengembanan Hukum, Ilmu Hukum, Teori Hukum, Dan Filsafat Hukum (Refika Aditama 2008).

E.Utrecht, Introduction to Administrative Law of the Republic of Indonesia (Pustaka Tinta Mas 1986).

F.A.M. Stroink J.G. Steenbeek, Inleiding in Het Staats-En Adinistratief Recht (Alphen aan den Rijn 1983).

Hilaire McCoubrey and Nigel D. White, Textbook on Jurisprudence (2rd edn, Blackstone Press Limited 1996).

Jazim Hamidi and Mustafa Lui, Dekonstruksi Hukum Pengawasan Pemerintahan Daerah (UB Press 2011).

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara (Jakarta 2015).

Kabupaten Banjar, ‘Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah Yang Baik Merupakan Instrument’ (banjarkab, 2018 LINKaccessed 2 February 2018.

Muhammad Djafar Saidi, Hukum Keuangan Negara (Raja Grafindo Persada 2008).

Philippe Nonet and Philip Selznick, Hukum Responsif (Nusamedia 2007).

Riant Nugroho, Kebijakan Publik Di Negara-Negara Berkembang (Pustaka Pelajar 2014).

Sri Hayati, ‘Pengembangan Model Manjemen Pembiayaan Sekolah Menegah Pertama (SMP) Rintisan Sekolah Bertaraf Internasional (RSBI) Di Kota Magelang’ (2011) 1 Journal of Economic Education LINK.

Suryansyah Murhami, Aspek Hukum Pemengawasan Pemerintah Daerah (Laksbang Mediatama 2008).

Suyamto, Beberapa Aspek Pengawasan Di Indonesia (Sinar Grafika 1994).

Triyastuti Setianingrum, ‘Komitmen Anggaran Pendidikan Di Kota Pendidikan Yogyakarta Masih Belum Mencapai 20 Persen’ (2017) 18 Populasi.

Toto Suharto, Pendidikan Berbasis Masyarakat: Relasi Negara Dan Masyarakat Dalam Pendidikan (LKIS 2012).

Widodo Ekatjahjana, Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dan Sistem Peradilannya Di Indonesia (Pustaka Sutra 2008).

Wirjono Projodikoro, Asas-Asas Hukum Tata Negara Di Indonesia (Dian Rakyat 1989).

Virgayani Fattah, ‘Hak Asasi Manusia Sebagai Jus Cogens Dan Kaitannya Dengan Hak Atas Pendidikan’ (2017) 32 Yuridika LINK


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Yuridika

Yuridika (ISSN: 0215-840X | e-ISSN: 2528-3103) by http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/YDK/index under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statcounter :

View My Stats

Yuridika has been indexed by:

  

Full Indexed Service