Efficient Public Participation in the Local Law-Making Process

Ekawestri Prajwalita Widiati

= http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i3.8914
Abstract views = 1755 times | downloads = 281 times

Abstract


Getting the public to participate in the government’s policy reflects a sense of control in democracy. However, constructing a mechanism of participation in legal provisions could be dilemma. It is important to realize that involving citizen in local government decision making particularly in law-making process has a fundamental difficulties; the essence of participation itself (openness and transparency) and the need to be efficient. This essay formulated an effective mechanism of public participation by juxtaposing steps in the local legislative process with the criteria of efficiency. This discussion is trying to encompass citizen participation from the initiation of a policy until it is enacted as a local legislation. Then in the next step, it will assess the elements that constitute an efficient drafting process. This article will consider such factors that are; financial cost; human resources or effort; wasted time; risk of failure; progress. The hypothesis is that not all of the means of public participation are efficient. The ideal notion of public participation put weighs on Local Authorities. What is needed to be underlined in this discussion is, to maximize the advantage of citizen involvement, it is important to look at the sequence where it should be held and what is the content. Moreover, the process of public participation should reflects principles namely: discovery, education, measurement, persuasion and legitimization.

Keywords


Local Legislation; Local Government; Public Participation; Public Consultation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Carol Harlow and Richard Rawlings, Law and Administration (CUP 2009).

Carole Pateman, Participation and Democratic Theory (CUP 1970).

Constantin Stefanou, ‘Drafters, Drafting and the Policy Process’ in’, Drafting Legislation; A Modern Approach (Constantin, Ashgate 2008).

G. Mahler, Comparative Politics and Institutional and Cross Cultural Approach (Pearson 2003).

G.C. Thornton, Legislative Drafting (Butterworths 1996).

Rod Hague and Martin Harrop, Comparative Government and Politics (7th edn, Palgrave Macmillan 2007).

Heinz Schäffer, ‘Evaluation and Assessment of Legal Effects Procedures: Towards a More Rational and Responsible Lawmaking Process’ (2001) 22 Statute Law Review.

Katharine Thompson, ‘General Duties to Consult The Public: How Do You Get The Public to Participate?’ (2002) 11 Nottingham L. J.

Machmud Aziz, ‘Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia’ (2010) 7 Jurnal Konstitusi.

Noor Azlina Hashim, ‘Consultation: A Contribution to Efficiency of Drafting Process in Malaysia’ (2012) 14 EJLR.

Norman Wengert, ‘Citizen Participation: Practice in Search of A Theory’ (1976) 16.23 Nat. Resources J.

James Sheppard, ‘Konsultasi Publik Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan’, APEC Workshop – Bali 27-28 November 2014 (Directorate for Public Governance & Territorial Development OECD 2014).

OECD, ‘OECD Public Management (PUMA) Policy Brief No. 10’ (OECD, 2001) LINK accessed 11 March 2013.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Yuridika

Yuridika (ISSN: 0215-840X | e-ISSN: 2528-3103) by http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/YDK/index under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statcounter :

View My Stats

Yuridika has been indexed by:

  

Full Indexed Service