Peer Review Process

All submitted articles must be free from plagiarism content. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to do the similarity checking. Editors will also check the similarity of articles in this journal by using PlagScan.

Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by Editorial Board. The initial review included an examination of compliance with the scope and author guidelines. Then, the article will be sent to the Peer reviewer and will proceed to the next review stage by the Double-Blind Peer Review Process. Editorial Board will seek additional opinions such as adding the third reviewer when necessary.

The final decision of the article acceptance is made by the Editor in Chief (together with Editorial Board in an editorial board meeting) considering the reviewer's critical comments. The final decision of the article is solely based on the Editor's final review which considering peer-reviewers comments (but not solely by the Reviewer). The articles that require revisions will be returned to the author for revision. The editor will issue an LoA after the revision is declared appropriate. Articles that are declined will also be immediately informed to the author. The article review process usually takes average 10 weeks. This review period depends on the editors and reviewers duration in reviewing the manuscript.