HEGEMONY OF PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEMS OF GOVERNMENT INTITUTIONS IN MALANG : AN IDEOLOGY PERSPECTIVE
Downloads
This study aimed to understand how the ideology of Gramsci hegemony thought be internalized into implementation and evaluation of Performance Accountability System of Government Institution (SAKIP) in Malang. This study was qualitative research by using a critical case study approach. Data collection of research was conducted by several techniques such as observation, semi-structured interview, and documentation with a key informant and several supporting informants. Data analysis in this study was thematic data analysis where it was used to identify and analyze the meaning pattern in a data set. The result of the study showed that ideology had an important role in maintaining hegemony in the implementation and evaluation of SAKIP in Malang. Ideology was internalized through a continuous socialization process, desk, and technical guidance that created awareness and fairness thus it formed a hegemonic culture. The results were expected to able to contribute theoretically, strengthening and enriching the theory of hegemony in the implementation and evaluation of SAKIP. In addition, the results of this study were expected to contribute practically to the Central Government's policies related to the implementation and evaluation of SAKIP that did not burden local governments.
Downloads
Ahyaruddin, M., and Akbar, R. 2016. The Relationship Between the Use of a
Performance Measurement System, Organizational Factors,
Accountability, and the Performance of Public Sector Organizations.
Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business. Vol.31 No.1.Pp.1-21.
Akbar, R., Pilcher, R., dan Perrin, B. 2012. Performance Measurement in
Indonesia: The Case of Local Government. Pasific Accounting Review.
Vol.24 No.3.Pp.262-291.
Al-Shbail, T., and Aman, A. 2018. E-government and accountability: How to
mitigate the disorders and dysfunctions of accountability relationships.
Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. Vol.12 No.2.Pp.
-190.
Arjuna, and Putri, A. M. 2019. Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Daerah.
Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ekonomika. Vol.9 No.2. Pp.223-232.
Ashraf, J., and Uddin, S. 2015. Military, ‘managers' and hegemonies of
management accounting controls: A critical realist interpretation. Journal
of Management Accounting Research. Vol. 29 No.1. Pp.13-26.
Bovens, M. 2010. Two concepts of accountability: accountability as a virtue and
as a mechanism. West European Politics. Vol. 33 No.5. Pp.946-967.
Cole, Nicki Lisa, 2019. "What Is Cultural Hegemony?" ThoughtCo, (online)
(thoughtco.com/cultural-hegemony-3026121), diakses pada tanggal 06
Maret 2019.
Cumbe, and Inácio. 2018. The impact of external audit on the accountability of
the common fund of the Mozambique National Institute of Statistics.
Managerial Auditing Journal. Vol. 3 No.6. Pp.538-557.
Ekundayo, W.J. 2017. Good Governance Theory and the Quest for Good
Governance in Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities and Social
Science. Vol. 7 No.5. Pp.154-161.
Fakultas Ekonomi. 2017. Strategi Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Pengendalian dan
Evaluasi Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah dalam Mewujudkan Good
Governance. Universitas Negeri Malang : Laporan Akhir tidak diterbitkan.
Gilis, P. L. 2011. The Big Four in China: Hegemony and Counter-hegemony in
the Development of the Accounting Profession in China”, Macquarie
Graduate School of Management. Macquarie University : Thesis,
Australia.
Guyadeen, D., and Seasons, M. 2018. Evaluation Theory and Practice: Comparing
Program Evaluation and Evaluation in Planning. Journal of Planning
Education and Research. Vol.38 No.1. Pp.98–110.
Haque, S. and Pathrannarakul, P. 2013. The role of technology in enhancing
transparency and accountability in public sector organizations of Pakistan.
International Journal of Economics Business and Management Studies.
Vol.2 No.1. Pp.20-24.
Li, X., and Soobaroyen, T. 2021. Accounting, Ideological and Political Work and
Chinese multinational operations: A neo-Gramscian perspective. Critical
Perspectives on Accounting. Vol.74 No.1. Pp.102-160.
Mantzari, Elisavet, Sigalas, Christos, Hines, and Tony. 2017. Adoption of the
International Financial Reporting Standards by Greek non-listed
companies: The role of coercive and hegemonic pressures. Journal of
Accounting Forum. Vol.41 No.3. Pp.185-205.
Mantzari, E and Georgiou, O. 2018. Ideological hegemony and consent to IFRS:
Insights from practitioners in Greece. Journal Critical Perspectives on
Accounting. Vol.59 No.1. Pp.70-93.
Pal, L. A. 2014. Beyond Policy Analysis: Public Issue Management in Turbulent
Times. Toronto: Nelson.
Ray, S. 2012. Reinforcing accountability in public services: an ICT enabled
framework. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. Vol.6
No.2. Pp.135-148.
Rosidin. 2010. Otonomi daerah dan Desentralisasi. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Safrijal, B.M.N., and Ali.H. 2016. Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Good Governance
Oleh Aparatur Pelayanan Publik Di Kecamatan Kluet Utara Kabupaten
Aceh Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Unsyiah. Vol.1 No.1. Pp.176-191.
Su, Xiaobo. 2011. Revolution and Reform: the role of ideology and hegemony in
Chinese politics. Journal of Contemporary China. Vol.20 No.69. Pp.307-
Sugandi. 2011. Administrasi Publik. Yogyakarta:Graha ilmu.
Suryanto. 2010. Menyoal Desentralisasi Fiskal: Mempertanyakan Akuntabilitas
Keuangan Pemerintahan Daerah. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Kinerja Otonomi
Daerah-LAN.
Vedung, E. 2010. Four Waves of Evaluation Diffusion. Evaluation. Vol.16 No.3.
Pp.263–277.
Xu, L., Cortese, C. and Zhang, E. 2013. Exploring hegemonic change in China: a
case of accounting evolution. Asian Review of Accounting. Vol.21 No.2.
Pp.113 - 127.
Xu, L. 2014. Exploring the role of accounting in hegemonic change: The case of
China from 1949 to 1992. Australia : Thesis of University of Wollongong.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Airlangga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
