Hubungan antara Anonimitas dengan Self-Disclosure pada Pengguna Twitter
Downloads
Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui hubungan antara anonimitas dengan self-disclosure pada pengguna Twitter. Penelitian terdahulu mengungkapkan bahwa anonimitas memungkinkan individu lebih berani untuk berkomunikasi secara online dan melakukan aktivitas self-disclosure. Fenomena tersebut dikenal sebagai online disinhibition effect. Namun, hasil penelitian kuantitatif ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat korelasi negatif antara anonimitas dengan self-disclosure pada pengguna Twitter. Partisipan pada penelitian ini kurang mengungkapkan dirinya ketika semakin tidak teridentifikasi secara visual.
Ardi, R., & Maison, D. (2014). How do Polish and Indonesian disclose in Facebook?: Differences in online self-disclosure, need for popularity, need to belong and self-esteem. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 12(3), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-01-2014-0006
Bak, J. Y., Kim, S., & Oh, A. (2012). Self-disclosure and relationship strength in Twitter conversations. In Proceedings of the Conference 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2012 (Volume 2:Short Papers), 60–64.
Clark-Gordon, C. V., Bowman, N. D., Goodboy, A. K., & Wright, A. (2019). Anonymity and Online Self-Disclosure: A Meta-Analysis. Communication Reports, 32(2), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1607516
Dean, B. (2021, February, 10). How Many People Use Twitter in 2021? [New Twitter Stats]. Retrieved August 28, 2021, from https://backlinko.com/Twitter-users
Deodhar, L., Divakaran, D. M., & Gurusamy, M. (2017). Analysis of Privacy Leak on Twitter. In Proceeding of GLOBECOM 2017-2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2017.8254496
Dienlin, T. (2017). The psychology of privacy: Analyzing processes of media use and interpersonal communication. http://opus.uni-hohenheim.de/volltexte/2017/1315/
Gruzd, A., & Hernández-García, Á. (2018). Privacy Concerns and Self-Disclosure in Private and Public Uses of Social Media. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(7), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0709
Hollenbaugh, E. E., & Everett, M. K. (2013). The effects of anonymity on self-disclosure in blogs: An application of the online disinhibition effect. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12008
Joinson, A. N., Houghton, D. J., Vasalou, A., & Marder, B. L. (2011). Privacy Online. Privacy Online, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6
Kapersky. (2021) Digital Reputation Economy Report. Retrieved August 28, 2021, from https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/digital-reputation-economy-report/
Kim, J., & Dindia, K. (2016). Online self-disclosure : A review of research Online Self-Disclosure : A Review of Research. October, 156–180.
Komori, M., Miura, A., Matsumura, N., Hiraishi, K., & Maeda, K. (2021). Spread of Risk Information Through Microblogs: Twitter Users with More Mutual Connections Relay News That is More Dreadful1. Japanese Psychological Research, 63(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12272
Krämer, N. C., & Schäwel, J. (2020). Mastering the challenge of balancing self-disclosure and privacy in social media. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.003
Leung, L. (2002). Loneliness, self-disclosure, and ICQ (" I Seek You ”) use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(3), 241–251.
Ma, X., Hancock, J., & Naaman, M. (2016). Anonymity, intimacy and self-disclosure in social media. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3857–3869. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858414
Mao, H., Shuai, X., & Kapadia, A. (2011). Loose tweets: An analysis of privacy leaks on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2046556.2046558
Meeder, B., Tam, J., Kelly, P. G., & Cranor, L. F. (2010). RT @IWantPrivacy: Widespread Violation of Privacy Settings in the Twitter Social Network. Web 2.0 Security & Privacy, 1–12. http://w2spconf.com/2010/%5Cnpapers3://publication/uuid/7FB63122-0D80-44FE-BE54-8C293088E157
Ng, T. K. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Intimacy, Passion, and Commitment Scale. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 39(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9731-4
Nguyen, M., Bin, Y. S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0277
Qian, H., & Scott, C. R. (2007). Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1428–1451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00380.x
Sayce, D. (2021) The Number of tweets per day in 2020. Retrieved August 28, 2021, from https://www.dsayce.com/social-media/tweets-day/
Scott, C. R., & Rains, S. A. (2020). (Dis)connections in anonymous communication theory: exploring conceptualizations of anonymity in communication research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1843367
Sproull, L. E. E., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492–1512.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
Taddicken, M. (2014). The "Privacy Paradox” in the Social Web: The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-Disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 248–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12052
Tominaga, T., Hijikata, Y., & Konstan, J. A. (2018). How self-disclosure in Twitter profiles relate to anonymity consciousness and usage objectives: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Computational Social Science, 1(2), 391-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-018-0023-z
Utz, S., Tanis, M., & Vermeulen, I. (2012). It is all about being popular: The effects of need for popularity on social network site use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0651
Walther, J., B. (1996). Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.
Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and Measurement of Reported Self"Disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2(4), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00494.x
BRPKM is a periodical publication with open access to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). Therfore, the copyright remains with the author.
With this license, anyone has the right to use the information and to re-distribute the content contained in this journal for any purpose, including commercial purposes. It can be done as long as it fulfills two conditions, namely; (1) you shall provide attribution by citing the original link source, and state if any changes have been made; and (2) you may not use any legal provisions or technological means of control that can legally restrict others from doing the things that are permitted by this license.
Journal editors will not ask the author to approve the transfer of copyright on all published manuscripts.
