Hubungan antara Anonimitas dengan Self-Disclosure pada Pengguna Twitter
Unduhan
Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui hubungan antara anonimitas dengan self-disclosure pada pengguna Twitter. Penelitian terdahulu mengungkapkan bahwa anonimitas memungkinkan individu lebih berani untuk berkomunikasi secara online dan melakukan aktivitas self-disclosure. Fenomena tersebut dikenal sebagai online disinhibition effect. Namun, hasil penelitian kuantitatif ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat korelasi negatif antara anonimitas dengan self-disclosure pada pengguna Twitter. Partisipan pada penelitian ini kurang mengungkapkan dirinya ketika semakin tidak teridentifikasi secara visual.
Ardi, R., & Maison, D. (2014). How do Polish and Indonesian disclose in Facebook?: Differences in online self-disclosure, need for popularity, need to belong and self-esteem. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 12(3), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-01-2014-0006
Bak, J. Y., Kim, S., & Oh, A. (2012). Self-disclosure and relationship strength in Twitter conversations. In Proceedings of the Conference 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2012 (Volume 2:Short Papers), 60–64.
Clark-Gordon, C. V., Bowman, N. D., Goodboy, A. K., & Wright, A. (2019). Anonymity and Online Self-Disclosure: A Meta-Analysis. Communication Reports, 32(2), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1607516
Dean, B. (2021, February, 10). How Many People Use Twitter in 2021? [New Twitter Stats]. Retrieved August 28, 2021, from https://backlinko.com/Twitter-users
Deodhar, L., Divakaran, D. M., & Gurusamy, M. (2017). Analysis of Privacy Leak on Twitter. In Proceeding of GLOBECOM 2017-2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2017.8254496
Dienlin, T. (2017). The psychology of privacy: Analyzing processes of media use and interpersonal communication. http://opus.uni-hohenheim.de/volltexte/2017/1315/
Gruzd, A., & Hernández-García, Á. (2018). Privacy Concerns and Self-Disclosure in Private and Public Uses of Social Media. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(7), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0709
Hollenbaugh, E. E., & Everett, M. K. (2013). The effects of anonymity on self-disclosure in blogs: An application of the online disinhibition effect. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12008
Joinson, A. N., Houghton, D. J., Vasalou, A., & Marder, B. L. (2011). Privacy Online. Privacy Online, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6
Kapersky. (2021) Digital Reputation Economy Report. Retrieved August 28, 2021, from https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/digital-reputation-economy-report/
Kim, J., & Dindia, K. (2016). Online self-disclosure : A review of research Online Self-Disclosure : A Review of Research. October, 156–180.
Komori, M., Miura, A., Matsumura, N., Hiraishi, K., & Maeda, K. (2021). Spread of Risk Information Through Microblogs: Twitter Users with More Mutual Connections Relay News That is More Dreadful1. Japanese Psychological Research, 63(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12272
Krämer, N. C., & Schäwel, J. (2020). Mastering the challenge of balancing self-disclosure and privacy in social media. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.003
Leung, L. (2002). Loneliness, self-disclosure, and ICQ (" I Seek You ”) use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(3), 241–251.
Ma, X., Hancock, J., & Naaman, M. (2016). Anonymity, intimacy and self-disclosure in social media. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3857–3869. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858414
Mao, H., Shuai, X., & Kapadia, A. (2011). Loose tweets: An analysis of privacy leaks on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2046556.2046558
Meeder, B., Tam, J., Kelly, P. G., & Cranor, L. F. (2010). RT @IWantPrivacy: Widespread Violation of Privacy Settings in the Twitter Social Network. Web 2.0 Security & Privacy, 1–12. http://w2spconf.com/2010/%5Cnpapers3://publication/uuid/7FB63122-0D80-44FE-BE54-8C293088E157
Ng, T. K. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Intimacy, Passion, and Commitment Scale. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 39(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9731-4
Nguyen, M., Bin, Y. S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0277
Qian, H., & Scott, C. R. (2007). Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1428–1451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00380.x
Sayce, D. (2021) The Number of tweets per day in 2020. Retrieved August 28, 2021, from https://www.dsayce.com/social-media/tweets-day/
Scott, C. R., & Rains, S. A. (2020). (Dis)connections in anonymous communication theory: exploring conceptualizations of anonymity in communication research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1843367
Sproull, L. E. E., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492–1512.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
Taddicken, M. (2014). The "Privacy Paradox” in the Social Web: The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-Disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 248–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12052
Tominaga, T., Hijikata, Y., & Konstan, J. A. (2018). How self-disclosure in Twitter profiles relate to anonymity consciousness and usage objectives: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Computational Social Science, 1(2), 391-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-018-0023-z
Utz, S., Tanis, M., & Vermeulen, I. (2012). It is all about being popular: The effects of need for popularity on social network site use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0651
Walther, J., B. (1996). Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.
Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and Measurement of Reported Self"Disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2(4), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00494.x
BRPKM adalah terbitan berkala dengan akses terbuka Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) sehingga hak cipta tetap berada di tangan penulis.
Dengan lisensi ini, siapapun berhak menggunakan informasi dan melakukan re-distribusi konten yang dimuat dalam jurnal ini untuk kepentingan apapun, termasuk kepentingan komersial. Hal tersebut dapat dilakukan selama memenuhi dua kondisi, yaitu; (1) anda harus memberikan atribusi dengan mengutip sumber tautan aslinya, dan menyatakan apabila ada perubahan yang dilakukan; dan (2) anda tidak dapat menggunakan ketentuan hukum atau sarana kontrol teknologi yang secara hukum dapat membatasi orang lain untuk melakukan hal-hal yang diizinkan oleh lisensi ini.
Redaksi jurnal tidak akan meminta penulis untuk melakukan persetujuan transfer hak cipta atas semua naskah yang diterbitkan.