Comparison of Consideration of Future Consequences in Vaccination Decision Making among Parents
Downloads
Consideration of Future Consequences (CFC) refers to the extent to which individuals reflect on how their current behavior may affect future outcomes. This study aimed to examine the differences in CFC among parents in making vaccination decisions for their children. The study involved 120 parents, divided into two groups: parents who chose to vaccinate their children and parents who refused vaccination. The sampling technique used was non-probability sampling with an unrestricted self-selected survey, employing the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale (CFC-14) developed by Joireman. Data analysis using an independent sample t-test showed that parents who allowed their children to be vaccinated had significantly higher CFC scores compared to those who refused (p < 0.001). Therefore, educational efforts to promote child vaccination could incorporate information regarding the positive long-term impacts of vaccination.
Azwar, S. (2013). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi (Edisi 2). PustakaPelajar
Bahraen, R. (2011). Pro kontra hukum imunisasi dan vaksinasi. Muslim.or.id. http://muslim.or.id/7073-pro-kontra-hukum-imunisasi-dan-vaksinasi.html
Brewer, N. T., & Fazekas, K. I. (2007). Predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability. A theory-informed, systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 45(2-3), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.05.013
CDC. (2019). About vaccines for your children. Vaccines for Your Children. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines-children/about/index.html
Demarque, C., Apostolidis, T., & Joule, R.-V. (2013). Consideration of future consequences and pro-environmental decision making in the context of persuasion and binding communication. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.019
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill
Gilmour, J., Harrison, C., Asadi. L., Cohen, M. H., & Vohra, S. (2011). Childhood immunization: When physicians and parents disagree. Pediatrics, 128(Supplement_4), S167-S174. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2720E
Gulley, T. (2011). The influence of time perspective on physical activity intentions and behavior. [Dissertation, East Tennessee State University]. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1357/
Handler, R. M., Hynes, L. M., & Nease, R. F. (1997). Effect of locus of control and consideration of future consequences on time trade off utilities for current health. Quality of Life Research, 6(1), 54-60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026417528508
Hidayatullah, A. (2017). Ini ragam alasan orangtua enggan imunisasi anak. Suara.com. https://www.suara.com/health/2017/04/28/172815/ini-ragam-alasan-orangtua-enggan-imunisasi-anak
Indriani, R. (2018). Menyoal kandungan babi dalam vaksin. Suara.com. https://www.suara.com/health/2018/08/21/180031/menyoal-kandungan-babi-dalam-vaksin
Joireman, J., Strathman, A., & Balliet, D. (2006). Consideration Future Consequences: An Integrative Model. In L. J. Sanna & E. C. Chang (Eds). Judgements over time: The interplay of thought, feelings, and behaviors (82-99). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195177664.003.0006
Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences 14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272-1287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212449362
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2016). Vaksin untuk pencegah, serum untuk pengobatan. https://kemkes.go.id/id/vaksin-untuk-pencegahan-serum-untuk-pengobatan
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2018). Berikan Anak Imunisasi Rutin Lengkap, Ini Rinciannya. https://sehatnegeriku.kemkes.go.id/baca/umum/20180428/5625737/berikan-anak-imunisasi-rutin-lengkap-rinciannya/
Kim, J., & Nan, X. (2015). Consideration of future consequences and HPV vaccine uptake among young adults. Journal of Health Communication, 20(9), 1033-1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018583
Kim, J., & Nan, X. (2016). Effects of consideration of future consequences and temporal framing on acceptance of the HPV vaccine among young adults. Health Communication, 31(9), 1089-1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1038774
Kim, J., & Nan, X. (2018). The effects of consideration of future consequences on HPV vaccine-related attitudes and intentions. Journal of Public Relations, 22(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.15814/JPR.2018.22.1.1
Morison, L. A., Cozzolino, P. J., & Orbell, S. (2010). Temporal perspective and parental intention to accept the human papillomavirus vaccination for their daughter. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(1), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910709x437092
Mulyani, N. S., & Rinawati, M. (2013). Imunisasi untuk anak: dilengkapi jadwal dan mitos seputar imunisasi. Nuha Medika
Nan, X., & Kim, J. (2014). Predicting H1N1 vaccine uptake and H1N1-related health belief model constructs: A multi-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Health Communication, 19(3), 376–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.821552
Ndoen, E. (2018). Krisis kepercayaan penyebab cakupan imunisasi anak Indonesia menurun 5 tahun terakhir. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/krisis-kepercayaan-penyebab-cakupan-imunisasi-anak-indonesia-menurun-5-tahun-terakhir-107900
Orbell, S., & Kyriakaki, M. (2008). Temporal framing and persuasion to adopt preventive health behavior: Moderating effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on sunscreen use. Health Psychology, 27(6), 770-779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.6.770
Peters, B. R., Joireman, J., & Ridgway, R. L. (2005). Individual differences in the consideration of future consequences scale correlate with sleep habits, sleep quality, and GPA in university students. Psychological Reports, 96(3), 817–824. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.96.3.817-824
Priyatno, D. (2011). Buku Saku Analisis Statistik. Mediakom
Proverawati, A., & Andhini, C. S. D. (2010). Imunisasi & Vaksinasi. Nuha Medika
Sara, A., & Nurit, C. (2014). Pro-environmental behavior and its antecedents as a case of social and temporal dilemmas. British Journal of Education Society & Behavioral Science, 4(4), 508-526. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2014/6573
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant out comes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 66(4), 742-752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Alfabeta
Sutriyanto, E. (2018). Sebanyak 57 orang terserang difteri di Aceh, tidak disangka ini pemicunya. Tribunews. https://www.tribunnews.com/regional/2018/03/05/sebanyak-57-orang-terserang-difteri-di-aceh-tidak-disangka-ini-pemicunya
Toepoel, V. (2010). Is consideration of future consequences a change able construct? Personality and Individual Diffrences, 48(8), 951-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.029
Wakefield, A. J., Murch, S. H., Anthony, A., Linnell, J., Casson, D. M. Malik, M., Berelowitz, M., Dhillon, A. P., Thomson, M. A., Harvey, P., Valentine, A., Davies, S. E., & Walker-Smith, J. A. (1998). Retracted: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. The Lancet, 351(9103). 637-641. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11096-0
Wicaksono, P. (2018). Menkes Nila Moeloek: Aceh daerah terendah capaian vaksin MR. TEMPO.CO. https://www.tempo.co/politik/menkes-nila-moeloek-aceh-daerah-terendah-capaian-vaksin-mr-818598
WHO. (2018). Children: Reducing mortality. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/children-reducing-mortality
WHO. (2019). Vaccines. https://www.who.int/topics/vaccines/en/#
WHO (2020). Infectious diseases. https://www.who.int/topics/infectious_diseases/en/
Wroe, A. L., Turner, N., & Salkovskis, P. M. (2004). Understanding and predicting parental decisions about early childhood immunizations. Health Psychology, 23(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.1.33
Zhang, Z., Kong., M., Zhang, L., & Li, Z. (2015). Consideration of future consequences: preliminary evidences for a four-factor distinction. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.022
Copyright (c) 2025 Reni Ferida, Arum Sulistyani, Intan Dewi Kumala, Zaujatul Amna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
BRPKM is a periodical publication with open access to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). Therfore, the copyright remains with the author.
With this license, anyone has the right to use the information and to re-distribute the content contained in this journal for any purpose, including commercial purposes. It can be done as long as it fulfills two conditions, namely; (1) you shall provide attribution by citing the original link source, and state if any changes have been made; and (2) you may not use any legal provisions or technological means of control that can legally restrict others from doing the things that are permitted by this license.
Journal editors will not ask the author to approve the transfer of copyright on all published manuscripts.
