Article Sidebar

Submitted
6 November 2022
Accepted
1 November 2023
Published
10 September 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 196 Download : 146

Main Article Content

Abstract

Highlights:


1. The focus of this study was on the underlying factors of fatigue among shipyard workers, an area that necessitates
further research to attain ideal standards in occupational health and safety.
2. This study can provide companies with material to use when counseling workers on the importance of a healthy
nutritional intake in preventing fatigue.


 


Abstract


Work fatigue remains a prevalent issue among workers in shipyards, leading to detrimental effects on physical well-being, including a decline in body resistance and productivity. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between age, nutritional status, working period, physical workload, noise, and lighting with fatigue levels among hull construction workers. This observational study used a cross-sectional approach with a total population of 112 individuals working in the production line of the Warship Division of a shipbuilding company. The sample size in this study was determined using stratified random sampling, resulting in an assembly of 53 samples. Proportionate stratified random sampling was then employed to determine the sample size for each subgroup of the population. The research data were analyzed using the Spearman correlation test (p<0.005). This study found a significant relationship between work fatigue and nutritional status (p=0.000), with a moderately positive relationship (r=0.511). Additionally, there was a significant relationship between work fatigue and physical workload (p=0.000), with a moderately positive relationship (r=0.531). Noise and work fatigue showed a significant relationship (p=0.010), with a weak positive relationship (r=0.353). Lighting and work fatigue showed a significant relationship as well (p=0.000), but with a moderately negative relationship (r=-0.524). On the other hand, work fatigue did not exhibit any significant relationship with age (p=0.129) or working period (p=0.651). This study establishes a relationship between work fatigue and numerous factors, including nutritional status, physical workload, noise, and lighting. However, age and working period are not related to work fatigue. Thus, it is recommended that companies align job requirements with employees' work capacity and conduct regular assessments of noise and lighting conditions to mitigate work-related fatigue.

Keywords

Nutritional Status Physical Workload Noise Work Fatigue public health

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Folia Medica Indonesiana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  • Folia Medica Indonesiana is a scientific peer-reviewed article which freely available to be accessed, downloaded, and used for research purposes. Folia Medica Indonesiana (p-ISSN: 2541-1012; e-ISSN: 2528-2018) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Manuscripts submitted to Folia Medica Indonesiana are published under the terms of the Creative Commons License. The terms of the license are:

    Attribution ” You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

    NonCommercial ” You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

    ShareAlike ” If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

    No additional restrictions ” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

    You  are free to :

    Share ” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.

    Adapt ” remix, transform, and build upon the material.

How to Cite
Siti Rokhati, Noeroel Widajati, Endang Dwiyanti, Saliza Mohd Elias, Efendi, A. A., & Adinda Novia Ardhani. (2023). Factors that cause Work Fatigue among Shipyard Workers. Folia Medica Indonesiana, 59(3), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.20473/fmi.v59i3.40407
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adventina T, Widanarko B (2021). Analisis faktor pencahayaan berhubungan dengan kelelahan kerja pada perawat di Rumah Sakit : Sebuah tinjauan pustaka sistematis. JKM (Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat) Cendekia Utama 9, 19. doi: 10.31596/jkm.v9i1.801.
  2. Amin MD, Kawatu PAT, Amisi MD (2019). Hubungan antara umur dan status gizi dengan kelelahan kerja pada pekerja lapangan PT Pelabuhan Indonesia IV (Persero) cabang Bitung. eBiomedik. doi: 10.35790/ebm.v7i2.24643.
  3. Aprilyanti S (2017). Pengaruh usia dan masa kerja terhadap produktivitas kerja (Studi Kasus: PT. OASIS Water International Cabang Palembang). Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri 1, 68. doi: 10.30656/jsmi.v1i2.413.
  4. Asriyani N, Karimuna SR (2017). Faktor yang berhubungan dengan terjadinya kelelahan kerja pada pekerja PT. Kalla Kakao Industri Tahun 2017. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Kesehatan Masyarakat Unsyiah. Available at: https://www.neliti.com/publications/198202/faktor-yang-berhubungan-dengan-terjadinya-kelelahan-kerja-pada-pekerja-pt-kalla#cite.
  5. Dewi PA, Lestantyo D, Widjasena B (2019). Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan kelelahan pada pekerja buruh angkut di Pasar Balai Tangah Kecamatan Lintau Buo Utara, Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat 7, 358–364. Available at: https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jkm/article/view/22999/21039.
  6. Etikan I (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics Biometrics & Biostatistics Internati onal Journal. doi: 10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149.
  7. Garedja C, Malonda NSH, Doda V (2017). Hubungan antara status gizi dengan kelelahan kerja pada tenaga kerja bongkar muat (TKBM) di Pelabuhan Manado. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/37482261/hubungan_antara_status_gizi_dengan_kelelahan_kerja_pada_tenaga_kerja_bongkar_muat_tkbm_di_pelabuhan_manado.
  8. Halson SL (2014). Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Medicine 44, 139–147. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0253-z.
  9. Intenational Labour Office (2018). World employment social outlook 2018: Greening with jobs. ILO. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/weso-greening/documents/WESO_Greening_EN_web2.pdf.
  10. Juliana M, Camelia A, Rahmiwati A (2018). Analisis faktor risiko kelelahan kerja pada karyawan bagian produksi PT Arwana Anugrah Keramik, Tbk. Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat. doi: 10.26553/jikm.2018.9.1.53-63.
  11. Kaunang DC, Suoth LF, Punuh MI (2019). Hubungan antara beban kerja fisik dan status gizi dengan kelelahan kerja pada pekerja bagian produksi di Pt. Industri Kapal Indonesia (Persero) Kota Bitung. Kesmas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Sam Ratulangi. Available at: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/kesmas/article/view/26632.
  12. Kurniawan D, Rusdi, Yuliawati R, et al (2020). Hubungan antara intensitas kebisingan dengan kelelahan kerja bagian pabrik di PT. X. Promotif: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat 10, 54–61. Available at: https://jurnal.unismuhpalu.ac.id/ind ex.php/PJKM/article/download/886/951/.
  13. Larasati D, Puspitasari W (2019). Pengaruh pengalaman, independensi, skeptisisme profesional auditor, penerapan etika, dan beban kerja terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti 6, 31–42. doi: 10.25105/jat.v6i1.4845.
  14. Malik I, Ikhram Hardi S, Hasriwiani Habo Abbas (2021). Faktor yang berhubungan dengan kelelahan kerja di PT. Industri Kapal Indonesia (Persero) Makassar. Window of Public Health Journal 580–589. doi: 10.33096/woph.v1i5.194.
  15. Ministry of Manpower of Republic Indonesia (2018). Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 tentang Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Lingkungan Kerja. Available at: https://jdih.kemnaker.go.id/asset/data_puu/Permen_5_2018.pdf.
  16. Monalisa U, Subakir S, Listiawati R (2022). Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan perilaku tidak aman pada pekerja service PT. Agung Automall cabang Jambi. Jurnal Innovasi Penelitian. doi: 10.47492/jip.v2i10.1332.
  17. Natizatun N, Siti Nurbaeti T, Sutangi S (2018). Hubungan status gizi dan asupan zat gizi dengan kelelahan kerja pada pekerja industri di industri Rumah Tangga Peleburan Alumunium Metal Raya Indramayu Tahun 2018. Afiasi : Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat 3, 72–78. doi: 10.31943/afiasi.v3i2. 21.
  18. Pratiwi AN (2019). The correlation between physical environmental factors and fatigue of the workers at Ship Repair Workshop. The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health 8, 274. doi: 10.20473/ijosh.v8i3.2019.277-285.
  19. Pua TLCA, Kawatu PA., Kapantow NH (2020). Hubungan antara beban kerja fisik dengan kelelahan kerja pada pekerja bagian operator boiler dan turbin di PJBS Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Uap Amurang. Kesmas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Sam Ratulangi. Available at: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/kesmas/article/view/28696.
  20. Pujiastuti AT, Lestantyo D, Wahyuni I, et al (2021). Analisis tingkat kelelahan berdasarkan beban kerja fisik perawat di Ruang Isolasi Rumah Sakit X saat pandemi corona virus (Covid – 19). Jurnal Riset Kesehatan Masyarakat. doi: 10.14710/jrkm.2021.11570.
  21. Rahmawati ND, Tualeka AR (2019). Correlation between individual characteristics, workload, and noise with work fatigue. The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health 8, 139–149. doi: 10.20473/ijosh.v8i2.2019.139-149.
  22. Safira ED, Pulungan RM, Arbitera C (2020). Kelelahan kerja pada pekerja di PT. Indonesia Power Unit Pembangkitan dan Jasa Pembangkitan (UPJP) Priok. Jurnal Kesehatan 11, 265. doi: 10.26630/jk.v11i2.2134.
  23. Sakti YA (2021). Faktor yang berhubungan dengan kelelahan kerja pada pegawai operator Stasiun Pengisian Bahan Bakar Umum (SPBU) di Kecamatan Tamalanrea Kota Makassar Tahun 2021 Universitas Hasanuddin (thesis). Univesitas Hasanuddin. Available at: http://repository.unhas. ac.id/id/eprint/7305/.
  24. Soeprapto EF, Cahyadi D, Nizaora D (2021). Pengantar budaya K3. CV. Literasi Nusantara Abadi.
  25. Spector PE (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology 34, 125–137. doi: 10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8.
  26. Sudirman Central Business District (2017). Buku pedoman pelaksanaan keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja. SCBD, Jakarta. Available at: https://www.scbd.com/assets/uploads/files/1527231545SCBD_Buku_Pedoman_Pelaksanaan_Keselamatan_dan_Kesehatan_Kerja_BP2K3_LR.compressed-ilovepdf-compressed.pdf.
  27. Suma'mur (2014). Higiene perusahaan dan kesehatan kerja (Hiperkes) edisi 2. Sagung Seto, Jakarta.
  28. Syekura AS, Febriyanto K (2021). Hubungan tingkat pendidikan dengan kepatuhan penggunaan APD pada pekerja di Galangan Kapal Samarinda. BSR: Borneo Studies and Research. Available at: https://journals.umkt.ac.id/index.php/bsr/article/view/2049.
  29. Tarwaka (2019). Ergonomi industri dasar-dasar pengetahuan ergonomi dan aplikasi di tempat kerja (2nd ed.). Harapan Press.
  30. Tung T-H, Hsiung M-C (2021). Work fatigue in a Hospital Setting: The experience at Cheng Hsin General Hospital. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060776.
  31. Wahyuni D, Indriyani I (2019). Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan kelelahan kerja pada pekerja bagian produksi di PT Antam Tbk. UBPP Logam Mulia. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan 11, 73–79. doi: 10.37012/jik.v11i1.70.
  32. Yamaula SM, Suwondo A, Widjasena B (2021). Hubungan antara beban kerja fisik dengan kelelahan kerja pada pekerja industri pengolahan ikan asin di UD. X. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat. doi: 10.14710/jkm.v9i1.28621.
  33. Yasril AI, Fatma F (2021). Penerapan uji korelasi spearman untuk mengkaji faktor yang berhubungan dengan kejadian diabetes melitus di Puskesmas Sicincin Kabupaten Padang Pariaman. Human Care Journal 6, 527. doi: 10.32883/hcj.v6i3.1444.
  34. Yogisutanti G, Firmansyah D, Suyono S (2020). Hubungan antara lingkungan fisik dengan kelelahan kerja pegawai produksi di Pabrik Tahu Sutera Galih Dabeda. Disease Prevention and Public Health Journal 14, 30. doi: 10.12928/ dpphj.v14i1.1805.