Intention of Muslim Millennials to Invest in Islamic Peer-to-Peer Lending in Indonesia
Downloads
Fintech Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending sharia is an evolution of sharia financial institutions through the use of technology in its operational processes. The millennial generation who grew up with technology has a greater talent in utilizing technology and has deeper insights compared to the previous generation. The purpose of this study is to analyze the determinants that influence Muslim millennials to invest in the Islamic P2P lending sector and determine strategies to improve its effectiveness. Latent variables Attitude Towards Behavior (AT), Subjective Norm (SN), Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC), Financial Literacy (FL), and Behavioral Intention (BI) are selected and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using SmartPLS. This study used an accidental sampling method which was carried out for 30 days of data collection, where 200 respondents were collected. The respondents were specifically the millennial Muslim generation who had invested in financial institutions at least once. The results showed that all latent variables had a significant influence and PBC had the largest contribution. There are three latent variables that have a significant positive effect on BI, namely AT, PBC, and FL. Meanwhile, only SN has a significant negative effect on BI. Therefore, it is necessary to increase literacy in the Indonesian community. Regulators and implementers must collaborate and synergize in improving Islamic financial literacy in Indonesia. For further research development, other variables or samples from different groups can be used to further enrich literacy in Islamic P2P lending.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.47985/dcidj.475
Al-Hashfi, R. U., & Zusryn, A. S. (2020). Exploring Islamic Peer-To-Peer Lending for the Unbankable. Airlangga International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance, 2(2), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.20473/aijief.v2i2.20648
Aulia, M., Yustiardhi, A. F., & Permatasari, R. O. (2020). An overview of Indonesian regulatory framework on Islamic financial technology (fintech). Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 6(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol6.iss1.art7
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Carlin, W., & Mayer, C. (2003). Finance, investment, and growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 191–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00112-0
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers..
Coulson, M. (2005). Gold as an investment. Applied Earth Science, 114(2), 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1179/037174505X62802
Darmansyah, Fianto, B. A., Hendratmi, A., & Aziz, P. F. (2020). Factors determining behavioral intentions to use Islamic financial technology: Three competing models. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(4), 794–812. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2019-0252
Dimock, M. (2019). Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center (pp. 1–7). https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
Elsaid, H. M. (2021). A review of literature directions regarding the impact of fintech firms on the banking industry. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 15(5), 693–711. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-10-2020-0197
Eprianti, N., Zia Firdaus, N., & Himayasari, N. D. (2020). Effectiveness financing through peer to peer financial technology at smmb (small and medium micro business) in Indonesia. Hamdard Islamicus, 43(2), 134–143.
Fachrudin, K. R., & Fachrudin, K. A. (2016). The influence of education and experience toward investment decision with moderated by financial literacy. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2016.14.2.05
Ferreira, J., & Perry, M. (2019). From Transactions to Interactions: Social Considerations for Digital Money. In T. Lynn, J. G. Mooney, P. Rosati, & M. Cummins (Eds.), In Disrupting Finance (pp. 121–133). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02330-0
Firmansyah, E. A., & Anwar, M. (2019). Islamic Financial Technology (Fintech): Its Challenges and Prospect. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 216, 52–58. https://doi.org/10.2991/assdg-18.2019.5
Fishbein, M. (1979). A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 27, 65–116.
Fornero, E., Monticone, C., & Trucchi, S. (2012). The Effect of Financial Literacy on Mortgage Choices. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015, 3073–3083. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1950040
Hasan, R., Hassan, M. K., & Aliyu, S. (2020). Fintech and Islamic Finance: Literature Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance (IJIEF), 3(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijief.2122
Hidajat, T. (2020). Unethical practices peer-to-peer lending in Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2019-0028
Hudaefi, F. A., & Beik, I. S. (2020). How Does Zakat Institution Respond To Fintech? Evidence From Baznas, Indonesia. Issues, 2, 2672–7471.
Hughes, J. P., Jagtiani, J., & Moon, C. G. (2019). Consumer Lending Efficiency:Commercial Banks Versus a Fintech Lender (FRB of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 19-22). https://doi.org/10.21799/frbp.wp.2019.22.
Ichwan, I., & Kasri, R. (2019). Why Are Youth Intent on Investing Through Peer To Peer Lending? Evidence From Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5(4), 741–762. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v5i4.1157
Indonesia Financial Services Authority. (2022). Statistik Fintech Lending Indonesia Juni 2022 (Issue June). https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/data-dan-statistik/fintech/Pages/Statistik-Fintech-Lending-Periode-Juni-2022.aspx
Janor, H., Yakob, R., Hashim, N. A., Aniza, C., & Wel, C. (2016). Financial literacy and investment decisions in Malaysia and United Kingdom: A comparative analysis. Geografia : Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(2), 106–118.
Khan, M. B., Ghafoorzai, S. A., Patel, I., & Shehbaz, D. M. (2021). Waqf based islamic fintech model for agriculture sector of Indonesia. International Journal of Business Ethics and Governance, 4(1), 73–85.
Klafft, M. (2008). Online peer-to-peer lending: A lenders’ perspective. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on E-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government, EEE 2008, July, 371–375. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1352352
Klein, G., Shtudiner, Z., & Zwilling, M. (2023). Why do peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms fail? The gap between P2P lenders’ preferences and the platforms’ intentions. Electronic Commerce Research, 23(2), 709–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09489-6
Laldin, M. A., & Furqani, H. (2019). Fintech and Islamic finance. Fintech In Islamic Finance, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351025584-8
Lenz, R. (2016). Peer-to-peer lending: Opportunities and risks. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(4), 688–700. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00010126
Lokken, L. (1986). The Time Value of Money Rules. Tax Law Review, 42. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/taxlr42&id=11&div=&collection=
Ma, Y. (2017). Introduction to the special issue on Crowdfunding and FinTech. Financial Innovation, 3(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-017-0058-9
Manning, M. (2009). The effects of subjective norms on behaviour in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 649–705. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X393136
Milne, A., & Parboteeah, P. (2016). The Business Models and Economics of Peer-to-Peer Lending (ECRI Research Report, 2016, No 17). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2763682
Muda, I., & Hasibuan, A. N. (2018). Public discovery of the concept of time value of money with economic value of time. Emerald Reach Proceedings Series, 1, 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-793-1-00050/FULL/EPUB
Muryanto, Y. T., Kharisma, D. B., & Ciptorukmi Nugraheni, A. S. (2022). Prospects and challenges of Islamic fintech in Indonesia: a legal viewpoint. International Journal of Law and Management, 64(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-07-2021-0162
Nawaz, N., & V. R., S. (2013). A Study on Various Forms of Gold Investment. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3525301
Nugraha, R. K., Eksanti, A. P., & Haloho, Y. O. (2022). The Influence Of Financial Literacy And Financial Behavior On Investment Decision. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 8(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.22441/jimb.v8i1.13535
Panos, G. A., & Wilson, J. O. S. (2020). Financial literacy and responsible finance in the FinTech era: capabilities and challenges. The European Journal of Finance, 26(4–5), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1717569
Pierrakis, Y. (2019). Peer to peer lending to businesses : investors’ characteristics, investment criteria and motivation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 20(4), 239–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1465750319842528 1
Pişkin, M., & Kuş, M. C. (2019). Islamic Online P2P Lending Platform. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 415–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.070
Poeteri, N. A., Simanjuntak, M., & Hasanah, N. (2021). The Investment Intention Among Indonesian Millennials via Peer-to-Peer Lending Applications. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 25(4), 2443–2687. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v25i4.6352
Puschmann, T. (2017). Fintech. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 59(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0464-6
Rosavina, M., Rahadi, R. A., Kitri, M. L., Nuraeni, S., & Mayangsari, L. (2019). P2P lending adoption by SMEs in Indonesia. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 11(2), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-09-2018-0103
Sangwan, V., Harshita, Prakash, P., & Singh, S. (2020). Financial technology: a review of extant literature. Studies in Economics and Finance, 37(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-07-2019-0270
Shaikh, I. M., Qureshi, M. A., & Noordin, K. (2020). Acceptance of Islamic fi nancial technology (FinTech) banking services by Malaysian users : an extension of technology acceptance model. Foresight, 22(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-12-2019-0105
Suryono, R. R., Budi, I., & Purwandari, B. (2017). Detection of fintech P2P lending issues in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(4), e06782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06782
Suryono, R. R., Budi, I., & Purwandari, B. (2020). Challenges and trends of financial technology (Fintech): A systematic literature review. Information (Switzerland), 11(12), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11120590
Tenaw, S., & Islam, K. M. Z. (2009). Rural Financial Services and Effects of Microfinance on Agricultural Productivity and on Poverty (University of Helsinki, Department of Economics and Management Discussion Papers no. 37).
Trafimow, D., & Finlay, K. A. (1996). The importance of subjective norms for a minority of people: Between-subjects and within-subjects analyses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 820–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296228005
Wulandari, P., Kassim, S., Adhi Kasari Sulung, L., & Iwani Surya Putri, N. (2016). Unique aspects of the Islamic microfinance financing process: Experience of Baitul Maal Wa Tamwil in Indonesia. Humanomics, 32(3), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/H-09-2014-0062
Yuniarti, S., & Rasyid, A. (2020). Consumer Protection in Lending Fintech Transaction in Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1477(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1477/5/052016
Zavolokina, L., Dolata, M., & Schwabe, G. (2016). FinTech – What ’ s in a Name ? May 2018.
Copyright (c) 2024 Shochrul Rohmatul Ajija, Sri Cahyaning Umi Salama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JDE (Journal of Developing Economies) (p-ISSN: 2541-1012; e-ISSN: 2528-2018) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY)
