Materialism and Environmental Knowledge as a Mediator for Relationships between Religiosity and Ethical Consumption
Downloads
ABSTRACT
On a global and regional scale, Indonesia has one of the least environmentally sustainable economies in the Asia-Pacific region. Consumption is one of the key factors contributing to environmental degradation. By using materialism and environmental knowledge as mediators, this study aimed to understand how religiosity affects ethical consumption. This research used quantitative methods with structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis techniques based on partial least squares (PLS). The data came from a questionnaire distributed online. 153 valid questionnaires were selected for analysis. All respondents came from Indonesia, were adults (from 18 years old), and were Muslims. Findings show that religiosity influences ethical consumption, materialism, and environmental knowledge. This research also reveals that materialism and environmental knowledge influence ethical consumption, as well as the mediating effect of materialism and environmental knowledge on the influence between religiosity and ethical consumption. So, all hypotheses from this research can be accepted. These findings contribute theoretically to explaining the relationship between religiosity, materialism, environmental knowledge, and ethical consumption. Thus, this findings contribute to the field of Islamic economics. Practically, the findings of this research can help marketers formulate communication strategies that take into account the level of religiosity of consumers in Indonesia. Marketers must avoid unethical practices to encourage ethical consumption.
Keywords: Religiosity, ethical consumption, materialism, environmental knowledge
ABSTRAK
Pada skala global dan regional, Indonesia merupakan salah satu negara dengan perekonomian paling tidak ramah lingkungan di kawasan Asia-Pasifik. Konsumsi merupakan salah satu faktor utama yang berkontribusi terhadap degradasi lingkungan. Dengan menggunakan materialisme dan enviromental knowledge sebagai mediator, penelitian ini berupaya memahami bagaimana religiosity mempengaruhi ethical consumption. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan teknik analisis Structural Equation Model (SEM) berbasis Partial Least Square (PLS). Data berasal dari kuesioner yang disebarkan online. 153 kuesioner yang valid dipilih untuk analisis. Seluruh responden berasal dari Indonesia, dewasa (mulai 18 tahun) dan beragama Islam. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa religiosity berpengaruh terhadap ethical consumption, materialism, dan environmental knowledge. Selain itu juga diketahui bahwa materialism dan environmental knowledge berpengaruh ethical consumption, serta adanya efek mediasi dari materialism dan environmental knowledge pada pengaruh antara religiosity dan ethical consumption. Sehingga, semua hipotesis penelitian ini dapat diterima. Secara praktis, temuan penelitian ini dapat membantu pemasar untuk merumuskan strategi komunikasi yang mempertimbangkan tingkat religiosity konsumen di Indonesia. Pemasar harus menghindari praktik tidak etis untuk mempromosikan ethical consumption.
Kata Kunci: Religiosity, ethical consumption, materialism, environmental knowledge
REFERENCES
Adib, H., & El-Bassiouny, N. (2012). Materialism in young consumers: An investigation of family communication patterns and parental mediation practices in Egypt. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 3(3), 255–282. doi:10.1108/17590831211259745
Adil, M. (2022). Influence of religiosity on ethical consumption: The mediating role of materialism and guilt. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(10), 2173–2192. doi:10.1108/JIMA-01-2020-0035
Al-Aidaros, A., Shamsudin, F. M., & Idris, K. M. (2013). Ethics and ethical theories from an Islamic perspective. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 4(1), 1–13. doi:10.24035/ijit.04.2013.001
Al Glenid, M. A., Al Sabbagh, A. L. T. E., Ba Kader, A. B. A., Izzidien, M. Y. S., & Llewellyn, O. A.. (1994). Environmental protection in Islam. Bonn, Germany: IUCN Environmental Law Centre (ELC)
Alzubaidi, H., Slade, E. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Examining antecedents of consumers' pro-environmental behaviours: TPB extended with materialism and innovativeness. Journal of Business Research, 122, 685–699. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.017
Bakar, A., Lee, R., & Hashim, N. H. (2013). Parsing religiosity, guilt and materialism on consumer ethics. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 4(3), 232–244. doi:10.1108/JIMA-04-2012-0018
Barnett, C., Cloke, P., Clarke, N., & Malpass, A. (2005). Consuming ethics: Articulating the subjects and spaces of ethical consumption. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography, 37(1), 23–45. doi:10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00472.x
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Belk, R. W., Ger, G., & Askegaard, S. (2003). The fire of desire: A multisited inquiry into consumer passion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 326–351. doi:10.1086/378613
Carrier, J. G. (2010). Protecting the environment the natural way: Ethical consumption and commodity fetishism. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography, 42(3), 672–689. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00768.x
Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Swim, J., Bonnes, M., Steg, L., Whitmarsh, L., & Carrico, A. (2016). Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges. American Psychologist, 71(3), 199–215. doi:10.1037/a0039482
Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2019). Research methodology and design. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin
Cornish, L. S. (2013). Ethical consumption or consumption of ethical products? An exploratory analysis of motivations behind the purchase of ethical products. Advances in Consumer Research, 41, 337-341
Davies, I. A., & Gutsche, S. (2016). Consumer motivations for mainstream "ethical” consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 50(7/8), 1326–1347. doi:10.1108/EJM-11-2015-0795
Dávila, J. F., Casabayó, M., & Singh, J. J. (2017). A World beyond Family: How external factors impact the level of materialism in children. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 51(1), 162–182. doi:10.1111/joca.12103
Delistavrou, A., Katrandjiev, H., & Tilikidou, I. (2017). Understanding ethical consumption: Types and antecedents. Economic Alternatives, 4, 612–633.
Dhir, A., Sadiq, M., Talwar, S., Sakashita, M., & Kaur, P. (2021). Why do retail consumers buy green apparel? A knowledge-attitude-behaviour-context perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102398
Doh, J. P., Tashman, P., & Benischke, M. H. (2019). Adapting to grand environmental challenges through collective entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(4), 450–468. doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0056
Eden, S., Bear, C., & Walker, G. (2008). Mucky carrots and other proxies: Problematising the knowledge-fix for sustainable and ethical consumption. Geoforum, 39(2), 1044–1057. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.11.001
Felix, R., & Braunsberger, K. (2016). I believe therefore I care: The relationship between religiosity, environmental attitudes, and green product purchase in Mexico. International Marketing Review, 33(1), 137–155. doi:10.1108/IMR-07-2014-0216
Forghani, E., Sheikh, R., Hosseini, S. M. H., & Sana, S. S. (2022). The impact of digital marketing strategies on customer's buying behavior in online shopping using the rough set theory. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 13(2), 625–640. doi:10.1007/s13198-021-01315-4
Ghali-Zinoubi, Z. (2022). Examining drivers of environmentally conscious consumer behavior: Theory of planned behavior extended with cultural factors. Sustainability, 14(13). doi:10.3390/su14138072
Graafland, J. (2017). Religiosity, attitude, and the demand for socially responsible products. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), 121–138. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2796-9
Guerra, J., Schmidt, L., & Valente, S. (2016). Dilemmas of sustainability in turbulent times: The portuguese case in context. In Green European: Environmental Behaviour and Attitudes in Europe in a Historical and Cross-Cultural Comparative Perspective, 221–242. London: Routledge
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Harun, T. W. R., Rashid, R. A., & Hamed, A. B. (2015). Factors influencing products' knowledge of Islamic banking employees. Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture, 3(1), 23–33. doi:10.15640/jisc.v3n1a4
Haryono. (2016). Metode SEM untuk penelitian manajemen dengan AMOS 22.00, LISREL 8.80 dan Smart PLS 3.0. Jakarta: Luxima Metro Media
Hope, M., & Young, J. (1967). Islam and Ecology. Retrieved from http://ruby.fgcu.edu/courses/twimberley/EnviroPol/EnviroPhilo/IslamAndEcology.pdf
Hurlock, E. B. (2006). Psikologi perkembangan. Jakarta: Erlangga
Irandust, M., & Bamdad, N. (2014). The role of customer's believability and attitude in green purchase intention. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(7), 242–248.
Jogiyanto. (2011). Konsep dan aplikasi SEM berbasis varian dalam penelitian bisnis.Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN
Junaidi, J., Wicaksono, R., & Hamka, H. (2022). The consumers' commitment and materialism on Islamic banking: the role of religiosity. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(8), 1786–1806. doi:10.1108/JIMA-12-2020-0378
Jung, H. J., Kim, H. J., & Oh, K. W. (2016). Green leather for ethical consumers in China and Korea: Facilitating ethical consumption with Value–Belief–Attitude logic. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 483–502. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2475-2
Kalamas, M., Cleveland, M., & Laroche, M. (2014). Pro-environmental behaviors for thee but not for me: Green giants, green Gods, and external environmental locus of control. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 12–22. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.007
Kamis, N. S., & Wahab, N. A. (2022). Investigating the level and determinants of hibah knowledge: A study among Muslims in Kedah, Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(3), 486–513. doi:10.1108/JIABR-05-2020-0167
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, (2018).
Khan, M. N., & Kirmani, M. D. (2018). Role of religiosity in purchase of green products by Muslim students: Empirical evidences from India. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 9(3), 504–526. doi:10.1108/JIMA-04-2017-0036
Kushwah, S., Dhir, A., & Sagar, M. (2019). Ethical consumption intentions and choice behavior towards organic food. Moderation role of buying and environmental concerns. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.350
McCullough, M. E., & Willoughby, B. L. B. (2009). Religion, Self-Regulation, and Self-Control: Associations, Explanations, and Implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 69–93. doi:10.1037/a0014213
Michel, J. F., Mombeuil, C., & Diunugala, H. P. (2022). Antecedents of green consumption intention: A focus on generation Z consumers of a developing country. Environment, Development and Sustainability. doi:10.1007/s10668-022-02678-9
Minton, E. A., Johnson, K. A., & Liu, R. L. (2019). Religiosity and special food consumption: The explanatory effects of moral priorities. Journal of Business Research, 95, 442–454. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.041
Mostafa, M. M. (2007). Gender differences in Egyptian consumers' green purchase behaviour: The effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 220–229. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00523.x
Nassani, A. A., Badawi, M., Confetto, M. G., Palazzo, M., Ferri, M. A., & Haffar, M. (2023). Towards ethical consumption activities among tourism firms: Nexus of environmental knowledge, CSR participation and psychological social support. Sustainability, 15(5). doi:10.3390/su15054675
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (2012). Muslim integration into western cultures: Between origins and destinations. Political Studies Association, 60(2), 228–251. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00951.x
Pagiaslis, A., & Krontalis, A. K. (2010). Green consumption behavior antecedents: Environmental concern, knowledge, and beliefs. Psychology & Marketing, 31(5), 335–348. doi:10.1002/mar.20698
Polonsky, M., Kilbourne, W., & Vocino, A. (2014). Relationship between the dominant social paradigm, materialism and environmental behaviours in four Asian economies. European Journal of Marketing, 48(3/4), 522–551. doi:10.1108/ejm-07-2011-0351
Raggiotto, F., Mason, M. C., & Moretti, A. (2018). Religiosity, materialism, consumer environmental predisposition. Some insights on vegan purchasing intentions in Italy. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(6), 613–626. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12478.
Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303-316. doi:10.1086/209304
Roberts, J. A. (1995). Profiling levels of socially responsible consumer behavior: A cluster analytic approach and its implications for marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 3(4), 97–117. doi:10.1080/10696679.1995.11501709
Sadiq, M., Bharti, K., Adil, M., & Singh, R. (2021). Why do consumers buy green apparel? The role of dispositional traits, environmental orientation, environmental knowledge, and monetary incentive. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102643
Shapiro, J. (2019). China's environmental challenges. Cambridge: Polity
Sharif, K. (2016). Investigating the key determinants of Muslim ethical consumption behaviour amongst affluent Qataris. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 7(3), 303–330. doi:10.1108/JIMA-01-2015-0001
Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., Lee, D. J., Nisius, A. M., & Yu, G. B. (2013). The Influence of love of money and religiosity on ethical decision-making in marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 183–191. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1334-2
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2021). Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Sampah Nasional. Retriebed from https://sipsn.menlhk.go.id/sipsn/
Solomon, M. R. (2010). Consumer behaviour: A European perspective. New Jersey: Pearson Education
Stávková, J., & TurÄínková, J. (2005). Consumer choice process when purchasing the staple food. Agricultural Economics (ZemÄ›dÄ›lská Ekonomika), 51(9), 389–394. doi:10.17221/5125-agricecon
Ulusoy, E. (2015). The role of religion in anti-consumption tendencies: Religiosity as a different form of consumer resistance. In Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the 2012 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference, 51–53.
Usmani, S., & Ejaz, A. (2020). Consumer buying attitudes towards counterfeit and green products: Application of social comparison theory and materialism. South Asian Journal of Management Sciences, 14(1), 82–103. doi:10.21621/sajms.2020141.05
Webster, Jr., F. E. (1975). Determining the characteristics of the socially conscious consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3), 188-196. doi:10.1086/208631
Wilson, J. A. J., & Hollensen, S. (2013). Assessing the implications on performance when aligning customer lifetime value calculations with religious faith groups and afterlifetime values-A Socratic elenchus approach. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 14(1), 67–94. doi:10.1504/IJBPM.2013.050588
Wooliscroft, B., Ganglmair-Wooliscroft, A., & Noone, A. (2014). The hierarchy of ethical consumption behavior: The Case of New Zealand. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(1), 57–72. doi:10.1177/0276146713508560
Yadav, R., Balaji, M. S., & Jebarajakirthy, C. (2019). How psychological and contextual factors contribute to travelers' propensity to choose green hotels? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 385–395. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.08.002
Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Young consumers' intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 732–739. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120
Copyright (c) 2023 Novi Sekar Sari, Ririn Tri Ratnasari, Ismah Osman, Ega Rusanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori and Terapan agree to the following terms:
- The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY NC SA).
- Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
-
- Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori and Terapan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
