Lessons Learned from Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya
Downloads
As a new principle in the world, Responsibility to Protect (R2P) is an obligation on the part of the international community and on the part of the states to protect civilians from mass atrocities by doing several actions like giving international aids, reducing poverty, supporting peacebuilding, educating the population, until military intervention. However, military intervention under R2P norm in Libya produce a counterproductive result which then led the country into civil war. From this background, therefore, the purpose of this article is to examine the implementation of R2P in Libya into four types of lessons learned. The first lesson, R2P is corrupted by great powers that make the military intervention far from its mandate. The second lesson is the inconsistency practice from an R2P military intervention which led to the question of credibility of military intervention in Libya. The third lesson is diplomacy must be prioritized rather than military intervention since that there is an R2P success story without military intervention. The last is the recommendation to implement Responsibility while Protecting (RWP) principle in the R2P framework.
Keywords: Responsibility to Protect (R2P), Libya, Diplomacy, Military Intervention, Responsibility while Protecting
Bachman, Jeffrey, 2015. "R2P's "Ulterior Motive Exemption” and the Failure to Protect in Libya”. Politics and Governance, 3 (4), pp. 56-67.
Bellamy, Alex J, 2014. The Responsibility to Protect: A Defense. [E-book] Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online. Available at: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198704119.001.0001/acprof-9780198704119 [Accessed 20 November 2016]
Bellamy, Alex J & Williams, Paul D, 2012. "Principles, Politics, and Prudence: Libya, the Responsibility to Protect and the Use of Military Force”. Global Governance, 18 (3), pp. 273-297.
Berti, B, 2014. "Forcible intervention in Libya: revamping the "politics of human protection”?”. Global Change, Peace & Security, 26 (1), 21–39.
Chandler, David, 2015. "The R2P Is Dead, Long Live the R2P: The Successful Separation of Military Intervention from the Responsibility to Protect”. International Peacekeeping, 22 (1), pp. 1-5.
Gifkins, Jess, 2016. "R2P in the UN Security Council: Darfur, Libya and beyond”. Cooperation and Conflict, 51 (2), pp. 148–165.
Hehir, Aidan, 2015. "Bahrain: an R2P Blind Spot?”. The International Journal of Human Rights, 19 (8), pp. 1129-1147.
Hobson, Christopher, 2016. "Responding to Failure: The Responsibility to Protect after Libya”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44 (3), pp. 433-454.
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, 2001. The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre
International Coalition for The Responsibility to Protect, 2013. A Toolkit on The Responsibility to Protect [pdf]. Available at: http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICRtoP%20Toolkit%20on%20the%20Responsibility%20to%20Protect(1).pdf [Accessed 18 November 2016]
Kersavage, K, 2014. "The "responsibility to protect” our answer to "never again”? Libya, Syria and a critical analysis of R2P”. International Affairs Forum, 5 (1), 23–41.
Kuperman, Alan J, 2013. "A Model Humanitarian Intervention? Reassessing NATO's Libya Campaign”. International Security, 38 (1), pp. 105–136.
Morris, Justin, 2013. "Libya and Syria: R2P and the spectre of the swinging pendulum.” International Affairs, 89 (5), pp. 1265–1283.
Moses, Jeremy, 2013. "Sovereignty as irresponsibility? A Realist critique of the Responsibility to Protect”. Review of International Studies, 39 (1), pp. 113–135.
Nuruzzaman, Mohammed, 2013. "The "Responsibility to Protect” Doctrine: Revived in Libya, Buried in Syria”. Insight Turkey, 15 (2), pp. 57-66.
O'shea, Elizabeth, 2012. "Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya: Ghosts of the Past Haunting the Future”. International Human Rights Law Review, 1 (1), pp. 173-190.
Paris, Roland, 2014. "The ‘Responsibility to Protect' and the Structural Problems of Preventive Humanitarian Intervention”. International Peacekeeping, 21 (5), pp. 569-603.
Pattison, James, 2010. "Humanitarian Intervention and The Responsibility to Protect: Who Should Intervene?”. [e-book] Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online. Available at: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199561049.001.0001/acprof-9780199561049 [Accessed 18 November 2016].
Pattison, James, 2011. "The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention in Libya”. Ethics & International Affairs, 25 (3), pp. 271-277.
Sharma, Serena K & Welsh, Jennifer M, 2015. The Responsibility to Prevent: Overcoming the Challanges of Atrocity Prevention. [E-book] Oxford : Oxford University Press Scholarship Online. Available at : http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717782.001.0001/acprof-9780198717782 [Accessed 18 November 2016].
Silander, Daniel, 2013. "R2P–Principle and Practice? The UNSC on Libya”. Journal of Applied Security Research, 8 (2), pp. 262-284.
The Brookings Institution, 2014. The Responsibility to Protect Hangs In the Balance [Online]. Available at: http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/component/content/article/35-r2pcs-topics/5320-brookings-institute-the-responsibility-to-protect-hangs-in-the-balance [Accessed 18 November 2016].
Tourinho, Marcos., Stuenkel, Oliver., & Brockmeier, Sarah, 2015. "Responsibility while Protecting: Reforming Implementation”. Global Society, 30 (1), pp. 134-150.
Wolff, S., 2011. "The regional dimensions of state failure”. Review of International Studies, 37 (3), pp. 951–972.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are unable to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work
- Authors are not permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The Copyright Holder of the articles is Global Strategis