Peacebuilding: the Shift towards a Hybrid Peace Approach
Downloads
contemporary peacebuilding. Peacebuilding, practically and conceptually, has
been dominated by the liberal peace paradigm. In this case, the
institutionalising of its core ideas such as democratisation, human rights, the
rule of law, and liberal market system to the post-conflict states and to a socalled ‘fragile/failed states' aiming at bringing peace and security has failed to create a comprehensive and sustainable peace on the ground as exemplified in Nicaragua, Haiti, Bosnia, Afghanistan, and other post-war states. Scholars focused on the issue of peacebuilding have engaged to a new approach that challenge the domination of the liberal paradigm through the accommodation and appreciation upon the ‘local' and thus create spaces for the interaction between the liberal and the ‘local' within forms of ‘hybrid peace' or ‘hybrid peacebuilding'
Books
Mac Ginty, Roger, 2011. International peacebuilding and local
resistance: Hybrid forms of peace, Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Richmond, Oliver P (ed), 2010. Peacebuilding critical developments and
approaches, Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.
Richmond, Oliver P, 2011. A post-liberal peace, England: Routledge.
Journals
Belloni, Roberto, 2012. "Hybrid peace governance: Its emergence and
significance”, Global Governance, 18 (1); ProQuest: 21-38.
Boege et.al., 2008. "On hybrid political orders and emerging states: State
formation in the context of ‘fragility'', Berghof Handbook Dialogue
: 1-21.
Boege et al., 2009. "Building peace and political community in hybrid
political orders”, International Peacekeeping, 16 (5): 599-615
Boege, Volker, 2010. "How to maintain peace and security in a postconflict
hybrid political order–the case of Bougainville”, Journal of
International Peacekeeping, 14: 330–352.
Boege, Volker, 2011. "Potential and limits of traditional approaches in
peacebuilding”, The Berghof Handbook II: pp.431-457.
Brown, MA, and Gusmao, AF, 2009. "Peacebuilding and political
hybridity in East Timor”, Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice,
(1): 61-69.
Chandler, David, 2013. "Peacebuilding and the politics of non-linearity:
rethinking ‘hidden' agency and ‘resistance”, Peacebuilding, 1 (1): 17-
Mac Ginty, Roger, 2010. "Hybrid peace: The interaction between topdown
and bottom-up”, Security Dialogue, 41:391.
Paris, R, 2010. "Saving liberal peacebuilding”, Review of International
Studies 36: 337–365.
Tom, P, 2013. "In search for emancipatory hybridity: The case of postwar
Sierra Leone”, Peacebuilding, 1 (2): 239-255.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are unable to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work
- Authors are not permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The Copyright Holder of the articles is Global Strategis