Debt Policy, Institutional Ownership, Company Values, and Assets Utilization as Intervening Variables in Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia
Downloads
Separation of functions between owners and management creates agency conflicts where the manager's decision is not necessarily in line with the owner. The manager no longer prioritizes the interests of the owner over his personal interests. Management as an insider effectively controls the company and knows more information than the owner as an outsider. In Asian countries, there is a tendency for majority ownership to take control in management. So that the agency conflict that occurs is no longer pure between managers and capital owners, but between majority and minority shareholders. This management system allows for expropriation by majority shareholders against minorities. The control mechanism is needed to suppress agency conflicts that exist within the company so that shareholders remain prioritized over the manager's personal interests.This study uses a sample of 123 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2016. The results of the study show that debt has a significant negative effect on the utilization of assets and company value. While institutional ownership has a significant positive effect on asset utilization and company value.
Coffee, J., 1991. Liquidity versus control: The institutional investor as corporate monitor. Columbia Law Review 91: 1277–1368.
Cornett M., Marcus A., Saunders A., & Tehranian H. 2007. The Impact of Institutional Ownership on Corporate Operating Performance. Journal of Banking & Finance 31:, 1771-1794. http://dx.doi.or/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.08.006.
Crutchley C. E., Jensen M. R. H., Jahera J. S., Raymond Jr. & Jennie E. 1999. Agency Problems and The Simultaneity of Financial Decision Making The Role of Institutional Ownership. International Review of Financial Analysis 8(2): 177-197.
Dada Ajayi Oziomobo & Ghazali Zahiruddin B. 2016. The Impact of Capital Structure on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance 7(4): 23-30. (IOSR-JEF), e-ISSN: 2321-5933, p-ISSN: 2321-5925. (Jul. - Aug. 2016),
Friend I. & Lang L. H. P. 1988. An Empirical Test of the Impact of Managerial Self-Interest on Corporate Capital Structure. Journal of Finance 43: 271-282.
Ghozali, Imam. 2008. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Grossman S. J. & O. Hart. 1982. Corporate Financial Structure and Managerial Incentives. The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, University of Chicago Press:128-146.
Habib H. J., Khan F. & Wazir M. I. 2016. Impact of Debt on Profitability of Firms; Evidence from Non-financial Sector of Pakistan. City University Research Journal 6(1) January. ISSN (Print) 2220-9174. ISSN (Online) 2409-0441.
Haruman Tendi. 2007. Pengaruh Keputusan Keuangan dan Kepemilikan Instutisional Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Listing di BEJ). The First PPM National Conference on Management Reseach. Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM. Universitas Widyatama Bandung.
Herdinata Christian., Tandelilin Eduardus., Hermeindito. 2014. Control Mechanism and Value of Firm: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia Capital Market. International Research Journal of Business Studies6(1): 2013-2014.
Hermuningsih Sri. 2013. Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Growth Opportunity, Sruktur Modal Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan Publik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta : Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan, Oktober.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The author(s) hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The author(s) retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
