Fostering Employee Ambidexterity: The Role of High-Performance Work System and Ambidextrous Leadership
Downloads
Objective: This study aims to empirically investigate the moderating effect of ambidextrous leadership in the relationship between high-performance work systems (HPWS) and employee ambidexterity.
Design/Methods/Approach: By integrating social exchange theory and the abilities, motivation, and opportunity (AMO model of human resource management), using a sample of 387 non-supervisory sales representative employees of Ethio-Telecom in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The proposed hypotheses were examined using structural equation modeling, SPSS plus AMOS software.
Findings: The study reveals that HPWS has a positive and significant effect on employee ambidexterity. In addition, ambidextrous leadership moderates the relationship between a high-performance work system and employee ambidexterity. Furthermore, at the high level of ambidextrous leadership, the effect of a high-performance work system on employee ambidexterity is stronger.
Originality: This study adds ambidextrous leadership as a moderator in the relationship between HPWS and employee ambidexterity, creating a new theoretical framework. Similarly, in stressing an evident gap in the relationship between HPWS and employee ambidexterity, this paper attempts to explain further how ambidextrous leadership moderates the effect of HPWS on employee ambidexterity.
Practical/Policy implication: The study result reveals that the supervisors' high ambidextrous leadership behaviors and well-crafted HPWS enhance the sales representative's desire to engage in exploitative and exploration activities. In light of this, it makes sense that ambidextrous leadership is necessary to greatly affect HPWS and employee ambidexterity, enabling the organization to guide its leadership selection and development.
Adams, J., Khan, H., & Raeside, R. (2014). Research Methods for Business and Social Science Students (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf
Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., & Aimran, N. (2020). An extensive comparison of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for reliability and validity. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 4(4), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2020.9.003
Alghamdi, F. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0081-8
Asyraf, W. M., & Afthanorhan, B. W. (2013). A comparison of partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and covariance based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) for confirmatory factor analysis. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology, 2(5), 198–205.
Awan, U., Kraslawski, A., & Huiskonen, J. (2018). The effects of an ambidextrous leadership on the relationship between governance mechanism and social sustainability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.017
Babbie, E. (2016). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.
Boxall, P. (2012). High-performance work systems: what, why, how and for whom? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50, 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7941.2011.00012.x
Boxall, P., & MacKy, K. (2009). Research and theory on high-performance work systems: Progressing the high-involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2008.00082.x
Byrne, B. (2016). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
Canií«ls, M. C. J., & Veld, M. (2019). Employee ambidexterity, high performance work systems and innovative work behaviour: How much balance do we need? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1216881
Caniels, M., Neghina, C., & Schaetsaert, N. (2017). Ambidexterity of employees: The role of empowerment and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(5), 1098–1119. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0440
Chirkov, V., & Anderson, J. (2018). Statistical positivism versus critical scientific realism. A comparison of two paradigms for motivation research: Part 1. A philosophical and empirical analysis of statistical positivism. Theory and Psychology, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318804670
Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied Structural Equation Modeling Using AMOS. In Applied Structural Equation Modeling Using AMOS. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018414
Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2021). Business research: A practical guide for students (5th ed.). Red Globe Press.
Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59, 501–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00045.x
Diogo, P., & Costa, J. F. da. (2019). High performance work systems and employee outcomes: A meta-analysis for Future Research (No. 1; Issue 1).
Edgar, F., Zhang, J. A., & Blaker, N. M. (2020). The HPWS and AMO: A dynamic study of system- and individual-level effects. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-12-2019-0541
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Fu, N., Ma, Q., Bosak, J., & Flood, P. (2015). Exploring the relationship between HPWS, organizational ambidexterity and firm performance in Chinese professional service firms. Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management, 6(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHRM-09-2014-0029
Garg, N., & Punia, B. (2017). Developing high performance work system for Indian insurance industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(3), 320–337.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.
Gong, Y., Chang, S., & Cheung, S. Y. (2010). High performance work system and collective OCB: A collective social exchange perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00123.x
Günsel, A., Altindag, E., Keçeli, S., Kitapçi, H., & Hiziroglu, M. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of organizational ambidexterity : The moderating role of networking. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2017-0057
Gürlek, M. (2020). Effects of high-performance work systems ( HPWSs) on intellectual capital, organizational ambidexterity and knowledge absorptive capacity: Evidence from the hotel industry. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2020.1774029
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (Seventh). Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.2307/2007941
Hair Jr., J. F., Gabriel, M. L. D. da S., & Patel, V. K. (2014). Modelagem de Equaçíµes Estruturais Baseada em Covarií¢ncia (CB-SEM) com o AMOS: Orientaçíµes sobre a sua aplicaçí£o como uma Ferramenta de Pesquisa de Marketing. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2718
Hinton, P., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2014). SPSS explained (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huang, J., & Kim, H. J. (2013). Conceptualizing structural ambidexterity into the innovation of human resource management architecture: The case of LG Electronics. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(5), 922–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.743471
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–872.
Jensen, J., Patel, P., & Messersmith, J. (2013). High-performance work systems and job control: Consequences for anxiety, role overload, and turnover intentions. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1699–1724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419663
Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V. A. S., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312.
Jyoti, J., & Dev, M. (2016). Perceived high-performance work system and employee performance: Role of self-efficacy and learning orientation. Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, 15(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972622516688392
Jyoti, J., & Rani, A. (2017). High performance work system and organisational performance: Role of knowledge management. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1770–1795. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2015-0262
Kloutsiniotis, P. V., & Mihail, D. M. (2020). Is it worth it? linking perceived high-performance work systems and emotional exhaustion: The mediating role of job demands and job resources. European Management Journal, 38, 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.12.012
Kumar, A. (2018). Exploring Motivation-Opportunity ( AMO) Perspective of High Performance Work System. International Journal of Research in Management, Economics and Commerce, 08(02), 159–165.
Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: Step-by-step guide for beginners (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Lepak, D. P., Liao, H., Chung, Y., & Harden, E. E. (2006). A Conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 25, 217–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(06)25006-0
Malik, A., Boyle, B., & Mitchell, R. (2017). Contextual ambidexterity and innovation in healthcare in India: the role of HRM. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1358–1380. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2017-0194
Malik, A., Pereira, V., & Tarba, S. (2017). The role of HRM practices in product development: Contextual ambidexterity in a US MNC's subsidiary in India. International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1325388
Marathe, G., & Pathak, K. (2013). Identification of multiple theoretical linkages for high performance work system: A literature review. Management and Labour Studies, 38(1&2), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X13491361
Marin-garcia, J. A., & Tomas, J. M. (2016). Deconstructing AMO framework: A systematic review. Intangible Capital, 1040–1087.
Mascareño, J., Rietzschel, E. F., & Wisse, B. (2021). Ambidextrous leadership: Opening and closing leader behaviours to facilitate idea generation, idea promotion and idea realization. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(4), 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1872544
McGaghie, W., Bordage, G., & Shea, J. (2001). Review Criteria. Academic Medicine, 76(9), 922–951. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200109000-00020
Mom, T. J. M., Chang, Y.-Y., Cholakova, M., & Jansen, J. J. P. (2018). A multilevel integrated framework of firm HR practices, individual ambidexterity, and organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Management, XX(X), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318776775
Mostafa, A. M. S. (2015). High-performance HR practices, work stress and quit intentions in the public health sector: Does person–organization fit matter? Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1100319
Mueller, J., Renzl, B., & Will, M. G. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership: a meta-review applying static and dynamic multilevel perspectives. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0297-9
Nadeem, K., Riaz, A., Iftikhar, Y., Ahmad, M. B., & Shamshad, W. (2019). Influence of high-performance work system on employee service performance and OCB: The mediating role of PsyCap. International Economics and Business, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5296/ieb.v5i2.15009
O'Reilly III, C., & Tushman, M. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future. Academy of Management, 27(4), 324–338.
Oluwafemi, T., Mitchelmore, S., & Nikolopoulos, K. (2019). Leading innovation: Empirical evidence for ambidextrous leadership from UK high-tech SMEs. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.035
Onwuegbuzie, A., & Leech, N. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500402447
Patel, P. C., Messersmith, J., & Lep. (2013). Walking the tightrope: An assessment of the relationship between high-performance work systems and organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1420–1442.
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Prieto-Pastor, I., & Martin-Perez, V. (2015). Does HRM generate ambidextrous employees for ambidextrous learning? The moderating role of management support. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(5), 589–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.938682
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity : balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organizational Science, 20(4), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
Reilly, C. A. O., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management, 27(4), 324–338.
Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 956–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students (7th ed., Vol. 4, Issue 1). Pearson Education Limited.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (Third Edit). Taylor & Francis.
Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity : towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x
Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864–894.
Su, F., Lei, Y., He, Y., & Luo, H. (2019). Perceived high-performance work systems and work well-being in the express industry: A moderated mediation model. 16th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, ICSSSM, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2019.8887727
Surucu, L., & Maslakci, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694–2726.
Swart, J., Turner, N., van Rossenberg, Y., & Kinnie, N. (2016). Who does what in enabling ambidexterity? Individual Actions and HRM practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1254106
Taguchi, N. (2018). Description and explanation of pragmatic development: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. System, XXX, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.010
Tensay, A. T., & Singh, M. (2020). The nexus between HRM, employee engagement and organizational performance of federal public service organizations in Ethiopia. Heliyon, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04094
Trong Tuan, L. (2016). Reform in public organizations: The roles of ambidextrous leadership and moderating mechanisms. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1195438
Tuan Luu, T. (2017). Ambidextrous leadership, entrepreneurial orientation, and operational performance: Organizational social capital as a moderator. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(2), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2015-0191
Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2012). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity : A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x
Wang, C. H., Baba, V. V., Hackett, R. D., & Hong, Y. (2019). Employee-experienced high-performance work systems in facilitating employee helping and voice: The role of employees' proximal perceptions and Trust in the Supervisor. Human Performance. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2019.1587765
White, M., & Bryson, A. (2019). The impact of high-performance work system on employees: A sectoral comparison (No. 12527).
Zacher, H., Robinson, A. J., & Rosing, K. (2016). Ambidextrous Leadership and Employees' Self-Reported Innovative Performance: The Role of Exploration and Exploitation Behaviors. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.66
Zacher, H., & Rosing, K. (2015). Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 36(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0141
Zacher, H., & Wilden, R. G. (2014). A daily diary study on ambidextrous leadership and self-reported employee innovation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 813–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12070
Zhang, J. A., Chen, G., O'Kane, C., Xiang, S., & Wang, J. (2020). How employee exploration and exploitation affect task performance: The influence of organizational competitive orientation. International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1745866
Zhang, J., Akhtar, M. N., Bal, P. M., Zhang, Y., & Talat, U. (2018). How do high-performance work systems affect individual outcomes: A multilevel perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(APR), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00586
Zhang, J., Bal, P. M., Akhtar, M. N., Long, L., Zhang, Y., & Ma, Z. (2018). High-performance work system and employee performance: the mediating roles of social exchange and thriving and the moderating effect of employee proactive personality. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12199
Zheng, J., Liu, H., & Zhou, J. (2020). High-performance work systems and open innovation: moderating role of IT capability. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 120(8), 1441–1457. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2019-0475
Copyright (c) 2022 Amare Werku Ijigu, Abebe Ejigu Alemu, Abdurezak Mohammed Kuhil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The author(s) hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The author(s) retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
