Pengaruh Task Technology Fit, System Quality dan Information Quality terhadap User Performance: Perceived Usefulness dan Perceived Ease Of Use Sebagai Pemediasi
Downloads
Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh langsung atau tidak langsung system quality terhadap user performance karyawan FEB Universitas Airlangga sebagai pengguna sistem informasi cybercampus melalui kegunaan (perceived ease of use dan perceived usefulness). Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel yang berasal dari karyawan Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Airlangga Surabaya. Pengambilan sampel untuk penelitian ini menggunakan purposive sampling yaitu teknik pengambilan sampel berdasarkan kriteria tertentu. berjumlah 58 responden. Hasil pengujian membuktikan bahwa system quality mempunyai pengaruh signifikan terhadap user performance karyawan FEB Universitas Airlangga. Perceived usefulness dan perceived ease of use belum mampu memediasi hubungan antara system quality terhadap user performance karyawan FEB Universitas Airlangga. Information quality mempunyai pengaruh signifikan terhadap user performance karyawan FEB Universitas Airlangga. Perceived usefulness dan perceived ease of use belum mampu memediasi hubungan antara information quality terhadap user performance karyawan FEB Universitas Airlangga. Task technology fit mempunyai pengaruh signifikan terhadap user performance karyawan FEB Universitas Airlangga. Perceived usefulness dan perceived ease of use belum mampu memediasi hubungan antara task technology fit terhadap user performance karyawan FEB Universitas Airlangga.
Adams, D.A., R.R. Nelson, P. A. Todd. 1992. Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication”, MIS Quarterly, 16 (2), pp. 227-247.
Alloway, R. 2007. Defining Success for Data Processing: A Practical Approach to Stratégie Planning for the DP Department, Retrieved from http// business.clemson.edu
Al-Mamary ,Y.H. , & Shamsuddin,A., dan Aziati ,N. 2014. The Role of Different Types of Information Systems in Business Organizations: A Review, International Journal of Research ,Vol.1 ,Issue.7,pp.333-339.
Amoako-Gyampah, K., and Salam, A. 2004. An Extension Of The Technology Acceptance Model In An ERP Implementation Environment. Information and Management 41(6), pp. 731 – 745.
Bailey, J.E. and S.W Pearson.1983. Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analysing Computer Satisfaction, Management Science 29 May
Bhattacherjee, A. 2002. Individual Trust In Online Firms: Scale Development And Initial Test, Journal of Management and Information Systems, 9 (1), pp. 211-241.
Bovee, M. 2004. Information Quality: A Conceptual framework and Empirical Validation, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Kansas, Kansas
C. Yoon, and T. Guimaraes. 1995. Assessing Expert Systems Impact On Users‘ Jobs. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12 (1), pp.225– 249.
Carswell, L., Thomas, P., Petre, M., Price, B., dan Richards, M. 2000. Distance Education Via The Internet: The student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31 (1), 29–46.
Chatzoglou, P.D., Vraimaki, E., Diamantidis, A. dan Sarigiannidis, L. 2010. Computer acceptance in Greek SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 78 - 101.
Chin W Wynne, dan Todd Peter. 1995. On The use Usefullness, Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution. Management Information System Quarterly, 21(3)
Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.
De Lone, W., and McLean, E. 1992. Information Systems Success: The Quest For The Dépendent Variable, Information Systems research 3(1), pp. 60-95.
. 2003. The DeLone McLean model of Information System Success: A Ten-Year Update, Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), pp. 3-9.
Dishaw, M. T., Strong D. M. and Bandy, D. B. 2002. Extending The TaskTechnology Fit Model With Self_Efficacy. Constructs Eighth Americas Conferences on Information System.
E.M. Moreau. 2006. The Impact of Intelligent Decision Support Systems On Intellectual Task Success: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, (42) pp.593– 607.
Furneaux, B. 2006. Theories Used In IS Research: Technology Acceptance Model. Available from: www.istheory.yorku.ea
Gomez, Faustino Cardoso. 2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Goodhue, D. L. and Thompson, R.L. 1995. Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly. 19(2): 213-236.
. 1998. Developmentien and Measurement Validity of A Task Technologi Fit Instrumen For User Evaluations of Information Sytem. Decision Sciences, Winter. 29(1): 105-138.
Goodhue, D., Klein, B, and March, S. 2000. User évaluations of IS As Surrogates For Objective Performance, Information & Management, 38, pp. 87-101
Gorla, N., Somers, T.M., dan Wong, B. 2010 Organizational Impact Of System Quality, Information Quality, And Service Quality, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol.19, pp.207–228.
Hair, Jr., dan Joseph F. 2008. Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International.
Hasan, Y., Shamsuddin, A., dan Aziati, N. 2013. The Impact of Management Information Systems adoption in Managerial Decision Making: A Review, The International Scientific Journal of Management Information Systems ,Vol.8 ,No.4,pp.010-017.
Huang, K., Lee, Y., and Wang, R. 1999. Quality Information and Knowledge, Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall
Igbaria, M., and Tan, M. 1997. The Conséquences of Information Technology Acceptance On Subséquent Individual Performance, Information & Management, 32, pp. 113-121.
J.Sviokla. 1990.The Examination of The Impact of Expert Systems On The Firm: The Case of XCO. MIS Quarterly, 1 (June),pp.126-140.
Kahn, B. K., Strong, D. M., dan Wang, R. Y. 2002. Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance. Communications
Malhotra, Naresh K., Kim, Sung S., Agarwal, J. 2005. Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, The Scale, and A Causal Model, Vol.15, No.4, pp.336-355.
Lederer, L., Maupin, D., Sena, M., and Zhuang, Y. 2006. The Technology Acceptance Model and The World Wide Web, Décision Support Systems, 29, pp. 269-282.
Livari, J. 2005. An Empirical Test of The De Lone–Mc Lean Model of Information System Success, Database for Advances in Information Systems, 36(2), 2005, pp. 8-27.
Miller, H. 2007. The Multiple Dimensions of Information Quality, Article Retrieved from : http://www.muhlenberg.edu.
Mohamed Ali, Bejjar dan Boujelbene Younes. 2013. The Impact of Information Systems on user Performance: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology Issue 2, April.
Raymond, Louis., Anne-Marie Croteau, dan Francis Bergeron. 2008. The Strategic Role of IT As An Antecedent To The IT Sophistication And IT Performance of Manufacturing SMEs, Volume 4, No.3 & 4
Seddon, P. A. 1997. Respecification And Extension of The DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success, Information Systems Research, 8(3), pp. 240-253.
Sekaran, Uma. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis. Edisi 4, Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Stone, R., Good, D., and Eveleth, B. 2006. The Impact of Information Technology On Individual And Firm Marketing Performance, Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(6), pp. 465 -482.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The author(s) hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The author(s) retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
