National Accreditation
Guideline for Authors
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
All articles submitted to Jurnal Psikiatri Surabaya must be original, previously unpublished material submitted exclusively to Jurnal Psikiatri Surabaya. The most recent version of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) "Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals" https://publicationethics.org/ must be adhered to. The Editorial Board reserves the right to edit all submitted articles for style, presentation, and clarity. For any purpose, authors may be required to revise their manuscripts. Manuscripts with excessive errors in any aspect may be declined or returned to the author for retyping. All submissions will undergo peer and editorial review.
We accept the following article types: (1) original articles (2) case report; (3) literature review; (4) systematic review and meta-analysis. Authors must likewise provide:
A cover letter addressed to the Editor-in-chief of Journal Psikiatri Surabaya should be included with the submission. The letter should include a statement about all previous submissions of the manuscript and previous reports that could be considered redundant publications of the work. If the manuscript has been submitted to another journal previously, authors are encouraged to include previous comments and responses to expedite the review process.
There is a template for the Cover Letter, Article, Literature Review, Systematic Meta-Analysis and Case Report.
Manuscripts should follow the submission guidelines of the journal. Authors are also encouraged to apply acceptable checklists in this journal i.e., Equator network
STUDY ETHICS
All submitted papers involving animal and/or human subjects should have received approval from an independent ethics committee (COPE). As stated previously, the copy of approval should be provided to the editorial team journal.
INFORMED CONSENT
For each article published in Jurnal Psikiatri Surabaya, each participant must provide informed consent. Written permission from a patient or a patient's relative to publish any information, image, or case report associated with the patient's clinical condition on the Jurnal Psikiatri Surabaya constitutes informed consent. The informed consent and patient confidentiality policies comply with all applicable data/privacy protection regulations and Article 28(G) of the Fourth Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
The consent form's language should reflect the local regulations applicable to the study's location. In the primary text of the manuscript, the author must indicate whether informed consent was obtained, including consent to publish the study in which the patient participated. The editor of the journal may request that the author submit the consent form. In certain instances, informed consent requirements may be waived for research. The ethics committee that evaluated and approved the study must determine whether informed consent is required or waived. For studies in which informed consent is relinquished, the author is required to submit an official letter of approval from the ethics committee indicating the waiver.
All identifiers, including but not limited to names, initials, dates of birth, and medical record numbers, must be removed from published patient data or information.
In the absence of a patient consent form for an appropriate study, the submission will be rejected.
GENERAL RULES:
This journal uses a double-blind review system. Jurnal Psikiatri Surabaya only accept manuscript in English. Every article submitted in Jurnal Psikiatri Surabaya (JPS) must meet the following general criteria:
- Manuscripts sent to the editor should be no more than 5.000 words in English including the title, abstract, table, and references (use word count in a computer program).
- Using the Times New Roman font format, 12 points, 1,5 space.
- A4 paper size with margins of 4 cm (top), 2.5 cm (right and left) and 2.7 cm (bottom).
- All pages are portrait.
|
Title Page |
Title The title is written in the Times New Roman font format, 14 points, bold, center, each with a maximum of 14 words in the format of the title case, not a sentence case, or uppercase. This is based on the view that the title is a phrase that does not need complete sentences. The title describes the summary of the research (brief, informative). Running Title The author is required to write a running title in English as part osf the complete title. Running title is written just one line in Times New Roman font format, 12 points, alight right, occupies the position of the header in a computer program, and is placed on each page (generally if using a computer program, this running title will automatically repeat on the position of the header on the following pages). Running Title can take the entire title sentence, but can also be a simple form of the title that is useful as the identity of the article.
|
|
Author List |
Name(s) of Author(s): should include the author(s)' full name(s), mailing address(es) for proofs, name(s), and address(es) of the department(s) to which the work should be attributed listed sequentially using a number (1) symbol. EXAMPLE: Yunias Setiawati1, Brihastami Sawitri2, Chien-ho Lin3 1Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga - Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya - Indonesia 2Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya - Indonesia 3Department of Psychiatry, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan Corresponding author: Chien-ho Lin Department of Psychiatry, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan chien@gmail.com +628. |
|
1. Original Article/ Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
|
|
Abstract |
The abstract is written in one page with no more than 250 words (use word count in a computer program) in American English Style. Divided into:
Should not include
|
|
Introduction |
State the objectives of the work and provide an adequate background. Explain how you addressed the problem and clearly state the aims of your study. Please describe in narrative format and do not use sub-chapter. (Times New Roman 12) |
|
Methods |
The methods section should provide enough detail to allow suitably skilled investigators to fully replicate your study. Specific information and/or protocols for new methods should be included in detail. If materials, methods, and protocols are well established, authors may cite articles where those protocols are described in detail, but the submission should include sufficient information to be understood independent of these references. (Times New Roman 12) Jurnal Psikiatri Surabaya is a journal that aims to be a leading peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information. We publish original research papers, review articles, and case studies focused on psychiatry, psychology, and mental health with particular emphasis placed on the related diseases as well as related topics that have neither been published elsewhere in any language nor are under review for publication anywhere. The following statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor, the reviewer, and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. |
|
Results |
The results should analyze the research data (also mention the machine/statistical tools, for example: Microsoft Excel or SPSS for Windows), and the techniques/types of statistical calculations used (regression, ANOVA, etc). Tables and figures can be provided in a total of no more than 5 which are conclusive in nature. Narrative results refer to the tables and figures but do not repeat words in tables and figures. |
|
Discussion |
The authors must honestly submit the meaning of the results of the study, especially the issues that are relevant to the basic research questions. Also how the results of the research can solve problems, differences and similarities with previous research and possible development. No need to repeat the things that have been stated in the results, but immediately discuss them in accordance with existing theories. The limitations of the study should be discussed in more depth and included in the last section of the Discussion. |
|
Conclusions |
The conclusion is free from statistics, and it should answer the Aims of the Study. This section also contains the message that Authors want to convey. Conclusions must answer questions written in the Introduction and must be based on research data, not literature reviews. |
|
Acknowledgments |
Acknowledgments can be given to those involved with this research. Authors need to include in the Conflict of Interest regarding the consequences that may arise in the future due to the exposure of scientific data with the interests of related institutions. |
|
Conflict of Interest |
State the Conflict of interest (if any) |
|
Funding |
State if there is any funding for your article |
|
2. Review articles/Literature review |
|
|
Abstract |
The abstract is written in one page with no more than 250 words (use word count in a computer program) in American English Style. Divided into:
Should not include
|
|
Introduction |
State the objectives of the article, the reasons for the study, formulation of the problem, and statement of purpose. Describe using a narrative format and without sub-chapter. (Times New Roman font 12). |
|
Review |
should be recognized as scholarly by specialists in the field being covered, but should also be written with a view to informing readers who are not specialized in that particular field, and should therefore be presented using simple prose. Please avoid excessive jargon and technical detail. Reviews should capture the broad developments and implications of recent work. The opening paragraph should make clear the general thrust of the review and provide a clear sense of why the review is now particularly appropriate. The concluding paragraph should provide the reader with an idea of how the field may develop or future problems to overcome, but should not summarize the article. To ensure that a review is likely to be accessible to as many readers as possible, it may be useful to ask a colleague from another discipline to read the review before submitting it. (Times New Roman font 12). |
|
Summary |
This part should explain the main summary of the article, highlighting its importance and relevance as well as suggestion or recommendation for further research (citation-free). (Times New Roman font 12) |
|
Acknowledgment |
Acknowledgments can be given to those involved with this research. Authors need to include in the Conflict of Interest regarding the consequences that may arise in the future due to the exposure of scientific data with the interests of related institutions. |
|
Conflict of Interest |
State the Conflict of interest (if any) |
|
Funding |
State if there is any funding for your article |
|
3. Case Report |
|
|
Abstract |
The abstract is written in one page with no more than 250 words (use word count in a computer program) in American English Style. Divided into:
Should not include
|
|
Introduction |
State the reasons for the case report, formulation of the problem, and statement of purpose. Describe using narrative format and without sub-chapter. |
|
Case |
This section contains the medical case about the patient's condition, time frame, disease progression, laboratory finding, differential diagnosis, and treatment uprightly. Explain the assessment and the decision to choose to treat the patient. |
|
Discussion |
Author should explain the most important finding in the case that is unusual or remarkable. Explain the mechanism/pathophysiology of injury with adequate basis or following guideline (using diagram if the author would like to). |
|
Conclusion |
This part should explain the main summary of the article, highlighting its importance and relevance as well as suggestion or recommendation for further cases |
|
Acknowledgment |
Acknowledgments can be given to those involved with this research. Authors need to include in the Conflict of Interest regarding the consequences that may arise in the future due to the exposure of scientific data with the interests of related institutions. |
|
Conflict of Interest |
State the Conflict of interest (if any) |
|
Funding |
State if there is any funding for your article |
|
Figure |
use center alignment format, JPEG format (not less than 300 dpi). Cite figures according to the first appearance in the manuscript and written in ascending Arabic numerals (e.g., Figure 1, Figure 2, and so on). (Times New Roman font 11, single line spacing) |
|
Table |
A maximum of 5 images and tables are used and open table type. |
|
References |
Minimum references are 20 items (minimum 3 textbooks). Preferably use references from scientific articles (with issues not exceeding the last 5 years) and textbooks maximum published in the last 10 years. The author can use special applications for bibliography such as: Mendeley, Writing literature should use the IEEE style using Mendeley software by including (a) for books: names of authors, editors (if any), year of publication, full title of the book, city of publisher, volume, edition and page number. (b) for periodicals: names of authors, year of publication, title of article, title of publication (abbreviated according to medicus index), volume and page number. Example of bibliography writing: [1] Summers, F. Object relations theories and psychopathology: A comprehensive text. New York: Psychology Press, 2014. [2] Bion, W. Learning from experience. New York: Basic Books, 1962. [3] Uno Y, Coyle JT. Glutamate hypothesis in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019;73:2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12823. [4] Grados MA, Alvi MH, Srivastava S. Behavioral and psychiatric manifestations in Cornelia de Lange syndrome. 2017;30(2):92. |
Please click for document template Jurnal Psikiatri Surabaya
