Occupation of The Husband is a Risk Factor for Psychological Problems Among Pregnant Immigrant Women in East Belitung, Indonesia
Introduction: According to WHO, there are 970 million people in the world who had psychological problems. The prevalence of psychological problems is highest in women (34.5%), and pregnant women who had psychological problems, especially depression, were about 10%, and 13% occurred in postpartum mothers. Psychological disorders in pregnant women might be caused by various factors, including the husband’s occupation and residency status. In order to provide the necessary care to pregnant women, it is important to know whether there is a relationship between a husband’s occupation and demographic status with maternal psychological problems. With this study, the relationship between a husband’s occupation and demographic status with psychological problems of pregnant women in the work area of Manggar Health Center, East Belitung, Indonesia can be analyzed. Methods: The study design was cross-sectional and analytic observation. The study sample consisted of 90 pregnant women (45 primiparous and 45 multiparous), who were randomly selected. The instrument used to collect data was the SRQ. Data from this study were analyzed using the chi-square test. Results: The results showed that the psychological problems in pregnant women were associated with the husband’s occupation (p = 0.018) and demographic status (p = 0.014). Conclusion: There were significant findings on the relationship between a husband’s occupation, pregnant women’s demographic status, and psychological problems.
Introductions
An unresolved issue or challenge in both developed and developing countries to date is the issue of mental health. Data from the WHO showed that there were 970 million people in the world who had experienced psychological problems[1]. There were about 4.7 million people who attempted self-harm[1]. The prevalence of psychological problems was higher among women (34.5%), men (23.2%), and pregnant women who experienced psychological problems, especially depression, around 10%, and 13% occurred in postpartum women[2].
The mental health and well-being of pregnant women were impacted by their own lives and the lives of their unborn children[3]. One of the antenatal psychological problems was associated with an increased risk of postpartum depression and decreased breastfeeding[4]. Another impact on pregnant women was preterm births[4]. Preterm birth has been identified as a common indirect cause of increased morbidity and mortality[5]. One of the indicators of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) was to improve well-being and ensure healthy lives for all people of all ages, including pregnant women, newborns, and children under five. The SDGs stated that by 2030, a country's neonatal mortality and maternal mortality rates should be less than 12 and 70 per 100,000 live births, respectively. The 2020-2024 strategic plan was established through the Minister of Health Regulation (PMK) Number 21 in the year 2020 to prevent and control mental health disorders. Therefore, it would be expected that all districts and cities should prioritize mental health issues to reach national goals. The Minister of Health Regulation stated that Puskesmas and its network were the first lines to conduct mental health checks using a special tool, the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ). Screening using SRQ was tailored based on target groups, which included people of productive age as well as pregnant and lactating mothers. Pregnant women who had been screened and treated were expected to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality. Research finds that primigravida mothers have a higher likelihood of experiencing psychological problems (70.74%) than multigravida mothers (65.70%).[6]
The emotional states of pregnant women needed to be known because the phases of a woman's life—pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum period, and breastfeeding—were very important. The most common reasons for psychological problems faced by pregnant women include lack of material resources, unfavorable working conditions, the burden of heavy household and family responsibilities, dysfunctional family relationships, and pregnancy complications[7].
First-level health facilities had implemented SRQ screening according to the Ministry of Health guidelines as part of the mandatory program. One of the sub-districts in East Belitung Regency with the largest population, screening results showed that the community experienced psychological problems. However, women and pregnant women had never been specifically screened for emotional status, so the emotional state of pregnant women was unknown. Research on the relationship between a husband's occupation and psychological problems in pregnant women in the working area of First Level Health Facilities Manggar, East Belitung Regency, had never been investigated.
Methods
This study used a cross-sectional design and analytic observations. The population was all pregnant women in the working area of First Level Health Facilities Manggar. The research period began in November 2023 and ended in April 2024. The sample used amounted to 90 respondents and was divided into two groups, namely 45 primigravida mothers and 45 multigravida mothers, using random sampling techniques from the total population at the time of the study. The inclusion criteria were pregnant women, age >19 years, and gestational age >28 weeks. Data collection was carried out through the distribution of questionnaires to eligible respondents. After signing the research consent form, respondents filled out the questionnaire. The SRQ questionnaire consisted of 20 questions. Positive answer scores of 6-20 indicated the presence of psychological problems. Data were processed by using IBM SPSS 22 software and analyzed by univariate and bivariate analyses with a significance level of p < 0.05 by the Chi-Square test. This study received ethical approval No. 25/EC/KEPK/FKUA/2024 from the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga Surabaya, Indonesia.
Results
The first-level health facility Manggar is an ambulatory care facility located in Kurnia Jaya Village, Manggar Sub-region, East Belitung Regency. Its working area consists of nine villages. The population of Kecamatan Manggar in 2022 was approximately 40,007 people. Most of the population were migrants, had a primary school education, and were freelancers/entrepreneurs. The first-level health facility in Manggar consisted of three sub-primary health centers, forty-two integrated health centers, and seven midwives' practices. The first-level health facility in Manggar has a total of four general practitioners, twenty-two midwives, twenty nurses, one pharmacist, two laboratory staff, and three nutrition staff.
Characteristics | Primiparous n = 45 | Multiparous n = 45 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | ||
Population | Immigrants | 27 | 46.6 | 31 | 53.4 |
Native people | 18 | 56.3 | 14 | 43.8 | |
Husband’s Occupation | Freelancers | 27 | 44.3 | 34 | 55.7 |
Permanent staff | 18 | 62.1 | 11 | 37.9 |
Variable | Pregnant Women n = 90 | Total | Chi-Square nilaiP | PR (95% CI) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Immigrants | Native people | |||||||
N | % | N | % | N | % | 0,018 | 3.549 (1.194-10.551) | |
Psychological problems Score 6-20 | 23 | 82.1 | 5 | 17.9 | 28 | 100 | ||
No psychological problem Score 1-5 | 35 | 56.5 | 27 | 43.5 | 62 | 100 |
Variable | Pregnant Women n = 90 | Total | Chi-Square nilaiP | PR (95% CI) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Freelancers | Permanent Staff | |||||||
N | % | N | % | N | % | 0,014 | 4.054 (1.253-13.112) | |
Psychological problems Score |
World Health Organization, “WHO recommendations. Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience.,” p. 200, 200AD.
WHO, “World Health Organization (WHO).” Accessed: May 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/
R. Wirdayanti and L. Dwi Febriati, Buku Ajar Psikologi Dalam Kehamilan, Persalinan dan Nifas, 1st ed., vol. 1. Respati Press, 2020.
S. Grigoriadis et al., “A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antenatal anxiety on postpartum outcomes,” Arch Womens Ment Health, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 543–556, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1007/S00737-018-0930-2.
D. Mongan et al., “Prevalence of self-reported mental disorders in pregnancy and associations with adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based cross-sectional study,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2572-4.
H. Hastanti, B. Budiono, and N. Febriyana, “PRIMIGRAVIDA MEMILIKI KECEMASAN YANG LEBIH SAAT KEHAMILAN,” Indonesian Midwifery and Health Sciences Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 167–178, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.20473/imhsj.v3i2.2019.167-178.
D. Tamiru et al., “Prevalence and Associated Factors of Common Mental Disorders Among Pregnant Mothers in Rural Eastern Ethiopia,” Front Psychiatry, vol. 13, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3389/FPSYT.2022.843984.
A. Fitriani et al., Buku Ajar Asuhan Kehamilan DIII Kebidanan Jilid II, 2nd ed., vol. 2. 2022. [Online]. Available: www.mahakarya.academy
E. Reid, F. Ghaedipour, and O. Obodaru, “With or without you: Family and Career-Work in a Demanding and Precarious Profession,” Journal of Management Studies, 2024, doi: 10.1111/joms.13073.
M. Nabolsi et al., “The health-related quality of life of Syrian refugee women in their reproductive age,” PeerJ, vol. 8, p. e9990, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.7717/PEERJ.9990/SUPP-1.
C. Opondo, S. Harrison, J. Sanders, M. A. Quigley, and F. Alderdice, “The relationship between perineal trauma and postpartum psychological outcomes: a secondary analysis of a population-based survey,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1186/S12884-023-05950-6/TABLES/6.
W. Evilia, A. Ayu Sri Wahyuni, and L. Nyoman Alit Aryani, “Immune System and Its Relation to Depression,” Jurnal Psikiatri Surabaya. Accessed: Jun. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JPS/article/view/28416/15566
K. Alnuaimi, A. Alshraifeen, and H. Aljaraedah, “Factors influencing quality of life among syrian refugees pregnant women in Jordan: A cross-sectional study,” 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10685.
G. Dağlar, D. Bilgiç, and S. A. Özkan, “Factors affecting the quality of life among pregnant women during third trimester of pregnancy,” Cukurova Medical Journal, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 772–781, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.17826/CUMJ.482553.
J. M. Bauer, T. Brand, and H. Zeeb, “Pre-migration socioeconomic status and post-migration health satisfaction among Syrian refugees in Germany: A cross-sectional analysis,” PLoS Med, vol. 17, no. 3, p. e1003093, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1003093.
M. Al-Mutawtah, E. Campbell, H. P. Kubis, and M. Erjavec, “Women’s experiences of social support during pregnancy: a qualitative systematic review,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1186/S12884-023-06089-0/FIGURES/2.
I. Yulia Darma, H. Anggraini, and S. Yunola, Buku Ajar Psikologi Kehamilan, Persalinan dan Nifas. 2022.
F. Sofiati, E. Widayati, R. Lestari, and S. Abdillah, “Characteristics Associated With Anxiety in Primigravida Mothers Facing Labor in Cianjur District,” KnE Medicine, vol. 2022, pp. 89–98, 2022, doi: 10.18502/kme.v2i2.11071.
M. Asadi, M. Noroozi, and M. Alavi, “Exploring the experiences related to postpartum changes: perspectives of mothers and healthcare providers in Iran,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/S12884-020-03504-8/TABLES/2.
E. C. V. Costa, E. Castanheira, L. Moreira, P. Correia, D. Ribeiro, and M. Graça Pereira, “Predictors of emotional distress in pregnant women: the mediating role of relationship intimacy,” Journal of Mental Health, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 152–160, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1417545.
D. Fuhr and K. Stevenson, “New evidence on the prevalence and risk of peripartum mental illness amongst migrant women: A global review of the literature,” Eur J Public Health, vol. 31, no. Supplement_3, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1093/EURPUB/CKAB164.465.
M. Atak, M. A. Sezerol, E. N. Koçak, M. S. Deǧer, and H. Kurubal, “Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and associated factors in immigrant pregnant women in Türkiye: A cross-sectional study,” Medicine (United States), vol. 102, no. 52, p. E36616, 2023, doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036616.
M. Lim, A. Van Hulst, S. Pisanu, and L. Merry, “Social Isolation, Loneliness and Health: A Descriptive Study of the Experiences of Migrant Mothers With Young Children (0–5 Years Old) at La Maison Bleue,” Front Glob Womens Health, vol. 3, 2022, doi: 10.3389/FGWH.2022.823632/FULL.
E. Reid, F. Ghaedipour, and O. Obodaru, “With or without you: Family and Career-Work in a Demanding and Precarious Profession,” Journal of Management Studies, 2024, doi: 10.1111/joms.13073.
G. Fellmeth, E. Plugge, K. M. Paw, P. Charunwatthana, F. Nosten, and R. McGready, “Pregnant migrant and refugee women’s perceptions of mental illness on the Thai-Myanmar border: a qualitative study,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, vol. 15, no. 1, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1186/S12884-015-0517-0.
M. Noonan, J. Jomeen, and O. Doody, “A review of the involvement of partners and family members in psychosocial interventions for supporting women at risk of or experiencing perinatal depression and anxiety,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 18, no. 10, May 2021, doi: 10.3390/IJERPH18105396/S1.
K. Mabetha et al., “Social Support during pregnancy: A phenomenological exploration of young women’s experiences of support networks on pregnancy care and wellbeing in Soweto, South Africa,” medRxiv, vol. 2, no. Cd, p. 2022.04.03.22273162, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.03.22273162v1%0Ahttps://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.03.22273162v1
Copyright (c) 2025 DARMIKA CAROLINE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyright of this journal is possession of the Author, by the knowledge of the Editorial Board and Journal Manager, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
3. The articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license. Many research funding bodies prefer the CC BY-SA license because it allows for maximum dissemination and re-use of open access materials. Users are free to share (copy, distribute, and transmit) and remix (adapt) the contribution under this license, including for commercial purposes, as long as they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.