Analisis Policy Acceptability Peraturan Daerah Kota Surabaya Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Downloads
Latar Belakang: Merokok adalah perilaku yang memiliki dampak negatif yang membahayakan kesehatan bagi perokok aktif maupun perokok pasif. Maka dari itu, perlu adanya penerapan peraturan dan perundangan KTR untuk dapat menurunkan proporsi perokok setiap hari.
Tujuan: Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu menganalisis acceptability Peraturan Daerah Kota Surabaya Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Tentang Kawasan Tanpa Rokok di Kota Surabaya.
Metode: Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah observasional dengan pendekatan yang bersifat kuantitatif dengan rancangan studi cross sectional. Variabel terikat dari penelitian ini adalah policy acceptability. Uji statistik yang dilakukan adalah analisis korelasi linier pearson untuk mengetahui hubungan atau korelasi antara variabel dependen dan independen. Responden pada penelitian ini merupakan seluruh masyarakat yang tinggal di Kota Surabaya dengan umur 12 tahun atau lebih.
Hasil: Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan analisis didapatkan hasil uji statistik korelasi linier pearson yang signifikan pada variabel background or individual factor adalah jenis kelamin dan pada variabel behavior adalah intention, personal autonomy, jumlah konsumsi, pengeluaran untuk merokok, usia berhenti merokok dan intention berhenti merokok.
Kesimpulan: Pemda Kota Surabaya tetap menerapkan Perda KTR, dan masyarakat senantiasa ikut berpartisipasi dalam mentaati Peraturan dengan berperilaku baik untuk menjaga kesehatan bersama.
ABSTRACT
Background: Smoking is a behavior that has a negative impact that is harmful to health for active smokers and passive smokers. Therefore, it is necessary to apply KTR rules and regulations to be able to reduce the proportion of smokers every day.
Objectives: The purpose of this research is to analyze acceptability of Surabaya, No. 2 of 2019 concerning No-Smoking Area in Surabaya City.
Methods: The research design used was observational with a quantitative approach to the cross-sectional study design. The dependent variable of this study is policy acceptability. The statistical test conducted was the Pearson linear correlation analysis to determine the relationship or correlation between the dependent and independent variables. Respondents in this study were all people who lived in the city of Surabaya with the age of 12 years or more.
Results: Based on the results of research and analysis obtained Pearson linear correlation statistical test results that are significant in the background variable or individual factor is gender and the behavioral variables are intention, personal autonomy, amount of consumption, expenditure for smoking, the age to stop smoking and intention to quit smoking.
Conclusion: The City Government of Surabaya continues to apply the KTR Regulation, and the community always participates in obeying the Regulations by behaving well to maintain joint health.
Ajzen, I. (2002) ‘Attitudes, personality and behaviour (2 ed)', Buckingham: Open University Press. doi:
4135/9781446249215.n22.
Anggraini, D.D.,and Hidajah, A.C. (2018) ‘Kejadian penyakit jantung koroner pada perempuan usia
produktif', Amerta Nutr Journal.Universitas Airlangga Surabaya.
Artanti, K. D., Lestari, K. S. and Martini, S. (2014) ‘Evaluasi implementasi perda kota surabaya no.5
tahun 2008 tentang KTR dan KTM pada tahun 2013 di fasilitas kesehatan.', Proceeding The 1st
Indonesian Conference on Tobacco or Health (ICTOH), 30(2), p. 176. doi:
22146/jh.v30i2.33645.
Arum, Y. T. G. (2019) ‘Hipertensi pada penduduk usia produktif (15-64 tahun)', HIGEIA Journal Of
Public Health Research And Development. Universitas Negeri Semarang. doi:
24198/jkg.v30i3.18532.
Degeling, C. et al. (2018) ‘Assessing the public acceptability of purposed interventions to reduce the
misuse of antibiotic in australia : a report on two cmmunity juries', Health Expect Journal.
Sydney. doi: 10.1111/hex.12589.
Departemen Kesehatan (2018) ‘Pusat Data dan Informasi Kementerian Kesehatan Republik
Indonesia', Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Indonesia. doi: 1 Desember
Van der Laan, J. D., Heino, A. and and de Waard, D. (1997) ‘A simple procedure for the assessment
of acceptance of advanced transport telematics', Transportation Research Part C: Emerging
Technologies. doi: 10.1526/003601107781170026.
Landwehr, J. (2005) ‘VOC: a bibliography of publications relating to the Dutch East India
Company,1602-1800.', Netherlands: HES & DE GRAAF Publisher. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-
-9.
Proctor, E. et al. (2011) ‘Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions,
Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda', Administration and Policy in Mental Health
and Mental Health Services Research. doi: 10.1177/1363459315574117.
Rahajeng, E. (2015) ‘Pengaruh penerapan kawasan tanpa rokok terhadap penurunan proporsi
perokok di provinsi daerah istimewa yogyakarta dan bali', Jurnal Ekologi Kesehatan. doi:
26502/jfsnr.2642-1100001.
Regan, M. A. et al. (2003) ‘On-Road Evaluation of intelligent Speed Adaptation, Following Distance
Warning and Seatbelt Reminder System: Final Results of the TAC SafeCar Project Victoria':,
Monash University Accident Research Centre. doi: 10.1922/CDH.
Rogers, E. M. (2003) ‘Diffusion of Innovations', The Free Press. New-York. doi: 10.1922/CDH.
Schade, J., and Schlag, B. (2003) ‘Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies.', Transportation
Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. BMC Public Health. doi: 10.1186/s12889-
-2415-9.
Schwartz, S. (1977) ‘Normative influence on alturism', Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-943.
Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M. and and Francis, J. J. (2017) ‘Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an
overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework', BMC Health Services
Research. BMC Health Services Research. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8.
Steg, L., Dreijerink, L. and And Abrahamse, W. (2005) ‘Factors influencing the acceptability of energy
policies: a test of vbn theory.', Journal Of Environmental Psychology. doi:
1177/0013916503251466.
Vlassenroot, S. et al. (2008) ‘Measuring acceptance and acceptability of its theoretical background in
the development of a unified concept.', TRAIL Research School. Delft, (January).
Vlassenroot, S. et al. (2011) ‘What driver the acceptability of Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA)',
European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.006.
Young, K. L. et al. (2003) ‘Acceptability of In-vehicle Intelligent transport systems to Young Novice
Drivers in New South Wales', Victoria: Monash University Accident Research Centre (Muarc).doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.006.
Media Gizi Kesmas by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and to retain the publishing right of the article without restrictions.
2. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
3. The Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under "the same, similar or a compatible license”. Other than the conditions mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violations.
