Visualization of bubbles generation of electrical-driven EndoActivator tips during solutions activation in a root canal model and a modified extracted tooth: A pilot study
Downloads
Background: EndoActivator, a sonically-driven canal irrigation system (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK), has been developed for activating root canal irrigants, and has recently been released onto the market. Purpose: To obtain an initial understanding of bubbles generation of electrical EndoActivator tips during activation of the irrigant in a transparent root canal model and a modified extracted tooth. Methods: A modified extracted tooth and a straight glass model were filled with a solution containing 17% EDTA or 3% NaOCl. A medium activator tip 22-mm polymer noncutting #25, 0.04 file driven by an electrical sonic hand-piece at 190 Hz (highest level) induced pressure waves that produced macro- and micro-bubbles. The physical mechanisms involved were visualized using a Miro 320S high-speed imaging system (Phantom, Wayne, NJ, USA) with high temporal and spatial resolutions. The imaging system acquired images at 25,000 frames per second with 320í—x240 pixels per image, and attached a 60-mm f/2.8 macro lens (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Results: The end of the tip did not generate bubbles formation. Disruption of surface tension at the air–solution system in the glass canal model by an electrical sonic driven EndoActivator tip generated bubbles in the solution. However, it did not occur at the system of solution–air interfaces in the glass canal and modified extracted tooth. Conclusion: The physical mechanism of the solution activated by an electrical sonic driven EndoActivator tip in generting bubbles formation is because the surface tension at the air–solution system disruption. No bubbles formation occurred in the solution in the restricted space either in the solution-air system or modified extracted tooth. Better understanding of the physical mechanisms that relate specifically to the activation behaviour of EndoActivator tips in solutions is key to improving the cleaning mechanism that applies during root canal treatment.
Downloads
Andreani Y, Gad BT, Cocks TC, Harrison J, Keresztes ME, Pomfret JK, Rees EB, Ma D, Baloun BL, Rahimi M. Comparison of irrigant activation devices and conventional needle irrigation on smear layer and debris removal in curved canals. (Smear layer removal from irrigant activation using SEM). Aust Endod J. 2021; 47(2): 143–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12482
Andrabi SM-U-N, Kumar A, Mishra SK, Tewari RK, Alam S, Siddiqui S. Effect of manual dynamic activation on smear layer removal efficacy of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and SmearClear: an in vitro scanning electron microscopic study. Aust Endod J. 2013; 39(3): 131–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2012.00350.x
Mancini M, Cerroni L, Iorio L, Armellin E, Conte G, Cianconi L. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study. J Endod. 2013; 39(11): 1456–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028
Tronstad L, Barnett F, Schwartzben L, Frasca P. Effectiveness and safety of a sonic vibratory endodontic instrument. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1985; 1(2): 69–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1985.tb00564.x
Plotino G, Pameijer CH, Grande NM, Somma F. Ultrasonics in endodontics: a review of the literature. J Endod. 2007; 33(2): 81–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.008
Gulabivala K, Ng Y-L, Gilbertson M, Eames I. The fluid mechanics of root canal irrigation. Physiol Meas. 2010; 31(12): R49-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/31/12/R01
Weller RN, Brady JM, Bernier WE. Efficacy of ultrasonic cleaning. J Endod. 1980; 6(9): 740–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(80)80185-3
Ruddle CJ. Hydrodynamic disinfection "tsunami” endodontics. Int Dent SA. 2009; 11(4): 6–18. pdf: http://www.moderndentistrymedia.com/july_aug2009/ruddle.pdf
Akman M, Akbulut MB, Aydınbelge HA, Belli S. Comparison of different irrigation activation regimens and conventional irrigation techniques for the removal of modified triple antibiotic paste from root canals. J Endod. 2015; 41(5): 720–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.001
Haupt F, Meinel M, Gunawardana A, Hülsmann M. Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation. Aust Endod J. 2020; 46(1): 40–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12342
Swimberghe RCD, De Clercq A, De Moor RJG, Meire MA. Efficacy of sonically, ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation in removing a biofilm-mimicking hydrogel from an isthmus model. Int Endod J. 2019; 52(4): 515–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13024
Rodrigues CT, EzEldeen M, Jacobs R, Lambrechts P, Alcalde MP, Hungaro Duarte MA. Cleaning efficacy and uncontrolled removal of dentin of two methods of irrigant activation in curved canals connected by an isthmus. Aust Endod J. 2021; 47(3): 631–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12534
van der Sluis LWM, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2007; 40(6): 415–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01243.x
Macedo R, Verhaagen B, Rivas DF, Versluis M, Wesselink P, van der Sluis L. Cavitation measurement during sonic and ultrasonic activated irrigation. J Endod. 2014; 40(4): 580–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.018
Matsumoto H, Yoshimine Y, Akamine A. Visualization of irrigant flow and cavitation induced by Er:YAG laser within a root canal model. J Endod. 2011; 37(6): 839–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.035
Verhaagen B. Root canal cleaning: through cavitation and microstreaming. [Enschede, The Netherlands]: Enschede: University of Twente; 2012. p. 359. doi: https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036534130
Çengel YA, Boles MA. Thermodynamics: an engineering approach. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011. p. 978. (Cengel series in engineering thermal-fluid sciences).
Scott AS, Fong E. Body structures & functions. Thomson/Delmar Learning; 2004. p. 495.
Peeters HH, Iskandar B, Suardita K, Suharto D. Visualization of removal of trapped air from the apical region of the straight root canal models generating 2-phase intermittent counter flow during ultrasonically activated irrigation. J Endod. 2014; 40(6): 857–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.011
Elger DF, Williams BC, Crowe CT. Engineering fluid mechanics. 10th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2012. p. 688.
Copyright (c) 2022 Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Every manuscript submitted to must observe the policy and terms set by the Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi).
- Publication rights to manuscript content published by the Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) is owned by the journal with the consent and approval of the author(s) concerned.
- Full texts of electronically published manuscripts can be accessed free of charge and used according to the license shown below.
- The Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
