Labial and palatal alveolar bone changes during maxillary incisor retraction at the Universitas Sumatera Utara Dental Hospital
Downloads
Background: The fundamental concept of tooth movement during orthodontic treatment is the occurrence of bone remodelling accompanied by tooth movement in equal proportions. The thickness of the alveolar bone, which supports incisors, is important in estimating the direction of tooth movement. Purpose: The study aimed to measure labial and palatal alveolar bone thickness changes after maxillary incisor retraction using lateral cephalograms. Methods: Cephalograms of 40 patients (18.58 ± 4.2 years) with skeletal Class I bimaxillary protrusion after maxillary first premolar extraction for insisivus retraction had been taken before (T0) and after (T1) orthodontic treatment. Changes in alveolar bone thickness were measured in linear and angular directions and then analysed with Spearman correlative analysis. Then the samples were separated into two groups based on the type of tooth movement (tipping and torque), and then the data were analysed using Wilcoxon analysis to see differences in the bone thickness (p<0.05). Results: There was a significant difference in the apical palate (p<0.05) and a relationship between retraction and alveolar bone thickness in the midroot area. In the angular direction, there was no significant difference and relationship; however, there was a significant difference in the labial crestal in the tipping group. In the torque group, the difference in bone thickness occurred in the crestal and apical palatal areas. Conclusion: The retraction and the type of tooth movement difference influence the alveolar bone thickness.
Downloads
Lin JC-Y, Yeh C-L, Liou EJ-W, Bowman SJ. Treatment of skeletal-origin gummy smiles with miniscrew anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2008; 42(5): 285–96. pubmed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18771123/
Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciğer S, Ariyürek M. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122(1): 15–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.119804
Yodthong N, Charoemratrote C, Leethanakul C. Factors related to alveolar bone thickness during upper incisor retraction. Angle Orthod. 2013; 83(3): 394–401. doi: https://doi.org/10.2319/062912-534.1
Tian Y-L, Liu F, Sun H-J, Lv P, Cao Y-M, Yu M, Yue Y. Alveolar bone thickness around maxillary central incisors of different inclination assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod. 2015; 45(5): 245–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.5.245
Son EJ, Kim SJ, Hong C, Chan V, Sim HY, Ji S, Hong SY, Baik U-B, Shin JW, Kim YH, Chae HS. A study on the morphologic change of palatal alveolar bone shape after intrusion and retraction of maxillary incisors. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1): 14454. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71115-6
Zhang F, Lee S-C, Lee J-B, Lee K-M. Geometric analysis of alveolar bone around the incisors after anterior retraction following premolar extraction. Angle Orthod. 2020; 90(2): 173–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.2319/041419-266.1
Domingo-Clérigues M, Montiel-Company J-M, Almerich-Silla J-M, García-Sanz V, Paredes-Gallardo V, Bellot-Arcís C. Changes in the alveolar bone thickness of maxillary incisors after orthodontic treatment involving extractions - A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019; 11(1): e76–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.55434
Morais JF, Melsen B, de Freitas KMS, Castello Branco N, Garib DG, Cattaneo PM. Evaluation of maxillary buccal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic alignment without extractions: A cone beam computed tomographic study. Angle Orthod. 2018; 88(6): 748–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.2319/101117-686.1
Nayak Krishna US, Shetty A, Girija MP, Nayak R. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth during orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric and computed tomography comparative study. Indian J Dent Res. 2013; 24(6): 736–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.127623
Helal NM, Basri OA, Baeshen HA. Significance of cephalometric radiograph in orthodontic treatment plan decision. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019; 20(7): 789–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10024-2598
Picanço PRB, Valarelli FP, Cançado RH, de Freitas KMS, Picanço GV. Comparison of the changes of alveolar bone thickness in maxillary incisor area in extraction and non-extraction cases: computerized tomography evaluation. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013; 18(5): 91–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s2176-94512013000500016
Mao H, Yang A, Pan Y, Li H, Lei L. Displacement in root apex and changes in incisor inclination affect alveolar bone remodeling in adult bimaxillary protrusion patients: a retrospective study. Head Face Med. 2020; 16(1): 29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00242-2
Hong SY, Shin JW, Hong C, Chan V, Baik U-B, Kim YH, Chae HS. Alveolar bone remodeling during maxillary incisor intrusion and retraction. Prog Orthod. 2019; 20(1): 47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0300-2
Aakash S, Purvesh S, Kumar GS, Romina K, Romil S, Bhumi M. Changes in alveolar bone thickness during upper incisor retraction. Rev Latinoam Ortod y Odontopediatría. 2017; : 19. web: https://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2017/art-19/
Chen SSH, Greenlee GM, Kim JE, Smith CL, Huang GJ. Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010; 137(6): 726.e1-726.e18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.11.009
Wei D, Zhang L, Li W, Jia Y. Quantitative comparison of cephalogram and cone-beam computed tomography in the evaluation of alveolar bone thickness of maxillary incisors. Turkish J Orthod. 2020; 33(2): 85–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19097
Pudyani PS, Sutantyo D, Suparwitri S. Morphological changes of alveolar bone due to orthodontic movement of maxillary and mandibulary incisors. Dent J (Majalah Kedokt Gigi). 2008; 41(1): 21. doi: https://doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v41.i1.p21-24
Oliveira TMF, Claudino LV, Mattos CT, Sant'Anna EF. Maxillary dentoalveolar assessment following retraction of maxillary incisors: a preliminary study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016; 21(5): 82–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.5.082-089.oar
Thongudomporn U, Charoemratrote C, Jearapongpakorn S. Changes of anterior maxillary alveolar bone thickness following incisor proclination and extrusion. Angle Orthod. 2015; 85(4): 549–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.2319/051614-352.1
Masumoto T, Hayashi I, Kawamura A, Tanaka K, Kasai K. Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Eur J Orthod. 2001; 23(1): 15–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/23.1.15
Al-Nimri KS, Hazza'a AM, Al-Omari RM. Maxillary incisor proclination effect on the position of point A in Class II division 2 malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79(5): 880–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.2319/082408-447.1
Ahn HW, Moon SC, Baek SH. Morphometric evaluation of changes in the alveolar bone and roots of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after en masse retraction using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2013; 83(2): 212–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.2319/041812-325.1
Copyright (c) 2022 Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Every manuscript submitted to must observe the policy and terms set by the Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi).
- Publication rights to manuscript content published by the Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) is owned by the journal with the consent and approval of the author(s) concerned.
- Full texts of electronically published manuscripts can be accessed free of charge and used according to the license shown below.
- The Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
