PERSPEKTIF POLITICAL JUSTICE DI DALAM IMPLEMENTASI BPJS PBI DI KOTA SURABAYA
Downloads
This study discusses the perspective of Political Justice in the Implementation of BPJS PBI in Surabaya. The study aims to determine the implementation of BPJS PBI in Surabaya has fulfilled Political Justice and the implementation of BPJS PBI in Surabaya is adequate as a form of political justice. The research method that uses is descriptive qualitative because it presents a detailed description of the situation or social phenomenon. Methods of data collection using direct interviews with resource persons include: Head of Surabaya City Health Office, Surabaya City DPRD Commission D, Lurah, PBJS recipient community. The results showed that the implementation of BPJS PBI in Surabaya City had not yet fulfilled Political Justice, based on indicators of fairness, equality, equality, and impartiality. The implementation of BPJS PBI in the city of Surabaya is also inadequate as a form of political justice because the state still determines justice in terms of profit and loss to health because the way of thinking lies in the amount of current contributions that do not match the actual calculation. Therefore, the implementation of the Health Insurance for the Poor program funded by the Surabaya City Regional Budget has not yet fulfilled the concept of Political Justice. This can be seen that there are still Health Insurance recipients who are not on target because of lack of accuracy in the process of verifying data on the poor in Surabaya, easy to get a Poor Certificate (SKM) that applies only once, and there are still groups of welfare recipients, so there is no meet the aspects of equity and justice.
Anggara, S (2013) Teori keadilan John Rawls kritik terhadap demokrasi liberal. Jispo, 1(1), 1– 11. https://doi.org/10.15575/jispo.v1i1.710
Basuki EW, Sulistyowati RN, & Herawati (2016) Implementasi kebijakan jaminan kesehatan nasional oleh BPJS Kesehatan di Kota Semarang, 1–11.
BPJS Kesehatan (2018) Sejarah Perjalanan Jaminan Sosial di Indonesia. Diakses 10 Juni 2019, dari https://bpjs-kesehatan.go.id/bpjs/pages/detail/2013/4
Cahyandari D, Istislam, & Hamidi J (2015) Hak monopoli negara dalam penyelenggaraan jaminan sosial perspektif negara kesejahteraan. Jurnal Hukum, 1–26.
Fisk M (1989) The State and Justice: An essay in political theory. Radical Philosophy Review of Books. USA: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.5840/radphilrevbooks199132
Godwin W (1793) An Enquiry Concerning Political Justice, Vol I, I(Book I), 1–323.
Kurnia TS (2013) Hak atas Derajat Kesehatan Optimal Sebagai HAM di Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Alumni.
Nasution BJ (2014) Kajian Filosofis tentang Konsep Keadilan dari Pemikiran Klasik sampai Pemikiran Modern, Yustisia, Vol. 3 No.2 Mei - Agustus 2014.
Putri AE (2014) Paham SJSN: Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional. Jakarta: Dewan Jaminan Sosial Nasional (DJSN).
Salim Z & Dartanto T (2013) Menggapai kesejahteraan bersama melalui sjsn: bisakah dengan payung robek? Kajian Kebijakan The Habibie Center, (June).
Vyandri, M. A. (2016). Implementasi kebijakan BPJS Kesehatan di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 2(2), 343–354.
- Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
- The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Atribusi-Non Commercial-Share Alike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
- Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.