JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR SELF-RESTRAINT : SOME INSIGHT INTO THE INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
Downloads
The Constitutional Court of Republic of Indonesia is centralized judicial review institution which implements a posteriori and abstract control. Constitutional court decision often politically sensitive and involve important issues. On the one hand handing down strong decisions that uphold important constitutional principles can bring great benefits to citizens and can strengthen support for democracy but on the other hand, strong role of the court in judicial review tends to encroach increasingly on the territory of the law making institution. This article examines the decision of constitutional court in the framework of a tension between constitutionalism and democracy, especially from theoretical or conceptual approach. As result of examining its decisions, Indonesian Constitutional Court may reflect two characters; judicial activism as characterized by acting as law-maker and using policy in judicial decisions and/ or judicial self-restraint. Recent Indonesian experience shows that judicial review of legislation is not a simply of judicial control over law-making institution, as it brings tension in the context of power relations in the scheme of separation of power. Relationship between the court and legislature, in respective of judicial review, will culminate in the philosophy of the judiciary. However, as constitutionalism and democracy are virtue, decisions of the Constitutional Court in judicial review should create mode of self-limitation within the framework of the principle of separation of powers.
Downloads
Book
Aharon Barak, The Judge in a Democracy (Princeton University Press 2006)
Andrew Harding and Peter Leyland (Ed), Constitutional Court: A Comparative Study (Simmonds Wildy & Hill Publishing 2009)
Anthony D'Amato, Analytic Jurisprudence Anthology (Anderson Publishing Co 1995)
Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory Of Law (Terjemahan Max Knight) (The Law Book Exchange, Ltd 2008)
James D. Richardson (ed.), First Inaugural Address: March 4, 1861” in A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents: 1789-1897 (Government Printing Press 1897)
Keith E.Whitthington, Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History (Princeton University Press 2007)
Larry D. Kramer, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (Oxford University Press 2004)
Mark V. Tushnet, Judical Review And Social Welfare Right In Comparative Constitutional Law (Princeton University Press 2007)
Pasquale Pasquino, ‘Constitutional Adjudication and Democracy. Comparative Perspectives: USA, France, Italy' (1998) 11 Ratio Juris
Paul Leicester Ford (ed.), Letter to Abigail Adams (Sept. 11, 1804), The Writings Of Thomas Jefferson 311 (GP Putnam's Sons 1897)
Ran Hirschl, Towards Juristocracy, The Origins and Consequences of the Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press 2004)
Richard A. Posner, The Federal Court (Harvard University Press 1996)
Simon Andrew Butt, ‘Judicial Review In Indonesia: Between Civil Law And Accountability? A Study Of Constitutional Court Decisions 2003-2005' (Melbourne University 2006)
Susan R. Burgess, Contest for Constitutional Authority: The Abortion and War Powers Debates (University Press of Kansas 1992)
Tim Koopmans, Court and Political Institusion: A Comparative View (Cambridge University Press 2003)
Ziyad Montana & Cyril Ramaphosa, Constitutional Law: Analysis and Cases (Oxford University Press 2002)
Journals
Bojan Bugarij, ‘Courts as Policy-Makers, Lessons from Transition' (2001) 42 Harvard International Law Journal
David Pozen, ‘Judicial Elections as Popular Constitutionalism' (2010) 10 Columbia Law Review
Donald P. Kommers, ‘Judicial Review: Its Influence Abroad' (1976) 428 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Federico Fabbrini, ‘Kelsen in Paris: France's Constitutional Reform and the Introduction of A Posteriori Constitutional Review of Legislation' (2008) 9 German Law Journal
Francisco Ramos Romeu, ‘The Establishment of Constitutional Courts: A Study of 128 Democratic Constitutions' (2006) 2 Review of Law and Economics
Jutta Limbach, ‘The Concept of Supremacy of the Constitution' (2001) 64 The Modern Law Review
Keenan D. Kmiec, ‘The Origin and Current Meanings of "Judicial Activism”' (2004) 92 California Law Review
Keith E.Whitthington, ‘Extrajudical Constitutional Interpretation: Three Objection and Responses' (2002) 80 N.C. Law Review
Larry D. Kramer, ‘"The Interest of the Man”: James Madison, Popular Constitutionalism, and the Theory of Deliberative Democracy' (2007) 41 Valparaiso University Law Review
Leonard F.M. Besselink, ‘The Proliferation of Law and Constitutional Adjudication, How American Judicial Review Came to Europe After All' (2013) 9 Utrecht Law Review
M. Laica Marzuki, ‘Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme' (2010) 7 Jurnal Konstitusi
Matthew D. Adler, ‘Popular Constitutionalism and the Rule of Recognition: Whose Practices Ground U.S. Law?' (2006) 100 Northwestern University Law Review
Mauro Cappelletti, ‘Judicial Review in Comparative Perspective' (1970) 58 California Law Review
Richard A. Posner, ‘The Rise and Fall of Judical Self-Restraint' (2012) 100 California Law Review
Tabatha Abu El-Haj, ‘Linking the Questions: Judicial Supremacy As a Matter of Constitutional Interpretation' (2012) 89 Washington University Law Review
Walter V. Schaefer, ‘Precedent and Policy' (1996) 34 The University of Chicago Law Review
Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, ‘Two Hundred Years of Marbury v. Madison: The Struggle for Judicial Review of Constitutional Questions in the United States and in Europe' (2004) 6 German Law Journal
Website
Academic, ‘Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias' LINK accessed 2 November 2012
