Juridical Analysis on Entrepreneurs' Obligation of Effort to Prevent Termination of Employment
Unduhan
This article aims to analyze the applicability of the employer's duty of care to prevent employment termination based on Article 15(1) Act No. 13 of 2003 on Labour, questioning if those obligations applied to all grounds and reasons resulting in termination of employment. To answer the objectives, this legal research uses the method of legislative approach by analyzing the available legal sources through systematic interpretation and legal argumentations. Relying on the result of the discussion, a conclusion is reached that employer's obligation of effort to prevent termination employment, as regulated under Article 151(1) UUK, is excluded when the employee is unable to perform its obligated duty after six months because he/she is entangled in criminal proceedings. If the Court decides the proceedings before the six months term ends and the employee is found to be guilty, then he/she is no longer the responsibility of the employer.
Unduhan
A.C.L Davies, Perspectives on Labour Law (Cambridge University Press 2004).
Aloysius Uwiyono dkk, Asas-Asas Hukum Perburuhan (Rajagrafindo Persada 2014).
Ashgar Ali Ali Mohamed, ‘Resolution of Industrial Disputes in New Zealand' (2012) 2 International Journal of Humanities and Social Science.
Bob Hepple, ‘A Right to Work' (1981) 10 Industrial Law Journal.
Constitutional Court Decision No. 012/PUU 1/2003; Ministry of Labor and Transmigration Circulation Letter No. 13 of 2005 on The Application of the Constitutional Court Decision on Substantial Test Rights of Legislation No. 13 of 2003 on Labour against 1945 Constitution
Deden Muhamad Surya, ‘Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Akibat Menolak Mutasi Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Asas Kepastian Hukum Dan Asas Keadilan' (2018) 2 Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika.
Directorate General Employment Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, ‘Termination of Employment Relationships: Legal Situation in the Member States of the European Union' (European Commission, 2006) LINK accessed 10 August 2018.
ILO Declaration of Philadelphia 1944 concerning the Aims and Purpose of the International Labour Organisation
ILO Convention No. 158 of 1982 on Termination on Employment based on the Employer Initiatives
Indi Nuroini, ‘Penerapan Perjanjian Bersama Dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja' (2015) 8 Jurnal Yudisial.
Legislation No. 13 of 2003 on Labour.
Lilik Mulyadi, ‘Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Indonesia Dalam Kajian Perspektif Normatif, Teoritis Dan Praktik Peradilan' (Badilum, 2007) LINK accessed 10 August 2018.
Manado District Court of Industrial Relation Decision No. 22/G/2012/PHI.MDO.
Medan District Court on Industrial Relation Decision No. 158/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2016/PN.Mdn
Ministry for Labour Circulation Letter No. 907 of 2004 on Prevention on Mass Employment Termination
Mohammad Ilyas, ‘Pengambilalihan Dan Penutupan Perusahaan Yang Berdampak Pada Perselisihan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan' (2018) 3 Jurnal Ius Constituendum.
Rantauprapat District Court Decision No. 67/Pid.C/2014/PN-RAP
Robert C. Byrd, ‘Employment as A Relational Contract' (2005) 8 Journal of Labor and Employment Law.
Serang District Court of Industrial Relation No. 115/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2016/PN. Srg.
Supreme Court Decision No. 658K/Pdt.Sus/2014.
Supreme Court Decision No. 280 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2016.
Supreme Court Decision No. 991 K/Pdt-Sus-PHI/2017.
Supreme Court Decision No. 462 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2018.
Supreme Court Decision No. 658 K/Pdt.Sus/2009.
Simon Deakin and Wanjiru Njoya, ‘The Legal Framework of Employment Relations, Working Paper No. 349' (2007).
Sukti Dasgupta, Employment Security: Conceptual and Statistical Issues (International Labour Office 2001).
