Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia’s Arbitration: Navigating Legal and Political Challenges
Unduhan
As Indonesia explores the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into its arbitration processes, it faces a complex landscape of challenges and opportunities. This study investigates how AI can enhance efficiency, transparency, and decision-making in arbitration, while also addressing significant legal and political concerns. From a legal perspective, the use of AI in arbitration raises issues of compatibility with existing laws, the need for ethical guidelines, and the protection of data privacy. Politically, the adoption of AI is influenced by the potential for shifting power dynamics, regulatory concerns, and the broader implications for national sovereignty and international relations. Through a detailed analysis of these factors, the study aims to provide insights into how Indonesia can effectively navigate the integration of AI in arbitration, balancing technological advancements with legal and political considerations. By offering recommendations for addressing these challenges, the research seeks to contribute to the development of a robust framework for AI-driven arbitration in Indonesia. This research finds that the legal political landscape influences how AI is regulated, with potential resistance from established legal institutions or political entities concerned about losing control or influence. From a legal perspective, AI systems can minimize biases or inaccuracies and potentially improve the impartiality and fairness of arbitration decisions. Current regulations may not fully address the unique challenges posed by AI, necessitating updates or new legislation to govern AI use in arbitration. It is therefore important to engage with political and legal stakeholders to address concerns and build consensus on the adoption of AI in arbitration.
Unduhan
Agus A, et al, ‘The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration: The Potential and Challenges’ (2023) 29 SASI.
Auslender V, ‘Artificial Intelligence Discourse Dominated by Utopian and Dystopian Prophecies’ (CTech News, 2023) <https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/ups0y6m02> accessed 31 August 2024.
Balbaa ME and Sagatovna M, ‘The Impact Of Artificial Intelligence In Decision Making: A Comprehensive Review’ (2024) 27 EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies.
Budi R, Ethical Theory in Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Prima Agus Teknik Foundation 2023).
Chan E, Gore KN and Jiang E, ‘Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in International Arbitration Practice’ (2023) 16 Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal.
Chauhan AS, ‘Future of AI in Arbitration: The Fine Line Between Fiction and Reality’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 2020) <https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/09/26/future-of-ai-in-arbitration-the-fine-line-between-fiction-and-reality/> accessed 31 August 2024.
Crawford K, ‘Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence’ (2022) 74 Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith.
Dhawan S, ‘Information and Data Security Concepts, Integrations, Limitations and Future’ (2014) 3 International Journal of Advanced Information Science and Technology (IJAIST).
Dodokin R, Artificial Intelligence and Arbitration: A Perfect Fit? (ADR Institute of Canada 2023).
Drahozal CR, ‘Arbitration Costs and Forum Accessibility: Empirical Evidence’ (2008) 41 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform.
Evans DL, ‘Dispute Resolution Enhanced: How Arbitrators and Mediators Can Harness Generative AI’ (2024) 78 Dispute Resolution Journal.
Fabrega and Fabrega 110 ARIFA Arias, ‘Artificial Intelligence (AI): Are Machines Revolutionizing International Arbitration?’ (110 ARIFA Arias, Fabrega & Fabrega) <https://www.arifa.com/articles-and-publications/n- 1864/artificial-intelligence-ai-are-machines-revolutionizing-international- arbitration.html#:~:text=The reliance on AI in,integrity of AI-generated outcomes> accessed 31 August 2024.
Fachri FK, ‘Catatan Penting Sebelum Memilih Forum Arbitrase Internasional’ (HukumOnline.com) <https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/catatan-penting-sebelum-memilih-forum-arbitrase-internasional-lt668d7521d4bfe?page=2> accessed 31 August 2024.
Feehily R, ‘Neutrality, Independence and Impartiality in International Commercial Arbitration, A Fine Balance in the Quest For Arbitral Justice’ (2019) 7 Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs.
Felzmann H, et al., ‘Transparency You Can Trust: Transparency Requirements for Artificial Intelligence between Legal Norms and Contextual Concerns’ (2019) 6 Big Data & Society.
Gesley J, ‘Artificial “Judges”? – Thoughts on AI in Arbitration Law’ (Library of Congress, 2021) <https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2021/01/artificial-judges-thoughts-on-ai-in-arbitration-law/> accessed 31 August 2024.
Hadylaya MH, ‘Harmonizing Arbitration: Clarity, Consistency, and Consent in the Application of Ex Aequo Et Bono’ (2024) 6 Jambura Law Review.
Haenlein M and Kaplan A, ‘A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: On the Past, Present, and Future of Artificial Intelligence’ (2019) 61 California Management Review.
Haesler J and Isler T, ‘Navigating the Main Impacts of Artificial Intelligence in International Arbitration: Insights from the ICC YAAF Workshop’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 2024) <https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2024/03/17/navigating- the-main-impacts-of-artificial-intelligence-in-international-arbitration- insights-from-the-icc-yaaf-workshop/> accessed 31 August 2024.
Holmes RA and Panarella MM, ‘Business Essentials for Neutrals: Starting, Growing, and Sustaining Your Practice’ (2018) 11 NYSBA: New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer.
Hussain MA, et al., ‘The Potential Prospect Of Artificial Intelligence (Ai) In Arbitration From The International, National And Islamic Perspectives’ (2023) 19 Journal of International Studies <https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2023.19.1.4>.
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), ‘Leveraging Technology for Fair, Effective and Efficient International Arbitration Proceedings’ (International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) 2022).
Japaridze N, ‘Fair Enough? Reconciling the Pursuit of Fairness and Justice with Preserving the Nature of International Commercial Arbitration’ (2008) 36 Hofstra Law Review.
Kalalo FP and Pontoh KC, ‘The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Legal Framework for International Arbitration Practices in Indonesia’, the Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution International Conference (ADRIC 2019).
Kreps S and Jakesch M, ‘Can AI Communication Tools Increase Legislative Responsiveness and Trust in Democratic Institutions?’ (2023) 40 Government Information Quarterly 101829.
Lex Machina, and Priancha A ‘Lex Machina’ <https://lexmachina.com> accessed 31 August 2024.
Mahardika ZP and Priancha A, ‘Pengaturan Hukum Artifical Intelligence Indonesia Saat Ini’ (HukumOnline.com, 2021) <https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pengaturan-hukum-artifical-intelligence-indonesia-saat-ini-lt608b740fb22b7/> accessed 31 August 2024.
Marrow PB, Karol M and Kuyan S, ‘Arbitration: The Computer as an Arbitrator—Are We There Yet?’ (2020) 74 Dispute Resolution Journal.
Mohamed YA, [et.,al.] ‘The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Language Translation: A Review’ (2024) 12 IEEE Access
Nwabueze EE, ‘Enhancing Multi-Factor Authentication in Modern Computing’ (2017) 6 Communications and Network.
Park W, ‘Arbitrators and Accuracy’ (2010) 1 Journal of International Dispute Settlement.
Paskarina C, ‘Artificial Intelligence in Politics: Contesting Power in Human and Nonhuman Relations in the Digital Era’ (2004) 9 Jurnal Wacana Politik.
Puspitasari C, ‘Tantangan Dalam Pengembangan Teknologi Artificial Intelligence Di Indonesia’ (Binus University, 2022) <https://binus.ac.id/malang/2022/08/tantangan-dalam-pengembangan- teknologi-artificial-intelligence-di-indonesia> accessed 31 August 2024.
Putra G, ‘Legal Challenges: The Accuracy of AI Chatbot Service Information and the Legal Protection of Users’ 12 Rechtsvinding.
Rajoo S, Law, Practice and Procedure Arbitration (2th edn, LexisNexis 2016).
Ramli AM, ‘Fenomena Baru AI Dan Arbitrase Bisnis’ (Kompas.com, 2024) <https://www.kompas.com/konsultasihukum/read/2024/02/07/165548380/fenomena-baru-ai-dan-arbitrase-bisnis?page=all#> accessed 31 August 2024.
Ray PP, ‘ChatGPT: A Comprehensive Review on Background, Applications, Key Challenges, Bias, Ethics, Limitations and Future Scope’ (2023) 3 Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems.
Regalia J, ‘From Briefs to Bytes: The GAI Renaissance in Legal Writing’ [2023] SSRN Electronic Journal.
Roselli D, Managing Bias in AI’, Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference (ACM 2019).
Selfeny R and Haryanto I, ‘Legal Transformation of Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution: Towards Sustainability and Inclusiveness’ 6 NCOLS.
Shah P and Khalesi B, ‘ChatGPT vs. Gemini: Which Gives the Better Answers?’ (Android Police, 2024) <https://www.androidpolice.com/chatgpt-vs-google-bard-better-answers/> accessed 31 August 2024.
Solhchi M and Baghbanno F, ‘Artificial Intelligence And Its Role In The Development Of The Future Of Arbitration’ (2023) 2 International Journal of Law in Changing World.
Surden H, ‘The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Law: Basic Questions’, Forthcoming Chapter in Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI (University of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper 2020).
Varsha PS, ‘How Can We Manage Biases in Artificial Intelligence Systems – A Systematic Literature Review’ (2023) 3 International Journal of Information Management Data Insights.
Veatch WS, ‘Artificial Intelligence and Legal Drafting’ (American Bar Association Legal Analytics Committee Newsletter, 2019) <https://www.americanbar.org/groups/business_law/publications/committee_newsletters/legal_analytics/2019/201904/ai-legal-drafting/> accessed 31 August 2024.
Wilkinson A, ‘How Natural Language Processing Can Improve Legal Search Results’ (Kira Systems) <https://kirasystems.com/learn/how-natural-language-processing-improving-can-improve-legal-search-results/> accessed 31 August 2024.
Wong YK, Applying AI and Big Data for Sensitive Operations and Disaster Management’, Advances in Machine Learning, Data Mining and Computing (Academy and Industry Research Collaboration Center (AIRCC) 2021).
Xu T, ‘AI Makes Decisions We Don’t Understand. That’s a Problem’ (Built In, 2021) <https://builtin.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-right-explanation> accessed 31 August 2024.
Zadgaonkar A V. and Agrawal AJ, ‘An Overview of Information Extraction Techniques for Legal Document Analysis and Processing’ (2021) 11 International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE).
Zafar A, ‘Balancing the Scale: Navigating Ethical and Practical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Integration in Legal Practices’ (2024) 4 Discover Artificial Intelligence.
Zhukov V, ‘AI for Lawyers: Artificial Intelligence for Modern Legal Practices’ (Medium, 2024) <https://zhukov.live/ai-for-lawyers-artificial-intelligence-for-modern-legal-practices-1758cbc89abd> accessed 31 August 2024.
Law No 1 of 2024 on the Amendment of Law No 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transaction.
Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No 2 of 2022.
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Herliana Herliana, Dyah Ayu Widowati

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.