Kegagalan pemaknaan "Lembaga Musawarah Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Desa”dalam mewujudkan deepening democracy
Downloads
Government's failure in the provision of public goods and ideas deepening democracy were considered as a panacea for the success of rural development. The objective of this research is to describe the village development planning in achieving policy production and to find essential elements in attempt to realize a superior deliberative policy. This research uses qualitative method. Research conducted in Southern Lampung, the Province of Lampung. Initial description obtained by understanding the meaning of emic and cross-subject inverstigation by comparing concept (theory), interpretation, and deliberative substantive policy theory formulation. Informant for this research consist of head of village and village officers, subdistrict head and its staff, SKPD in Southern Lampung Regency and chief and officers of provincial assembly; (2) elit and political party figures, Non-governmental organization and choosen villagers; (3) businessmen and local group interest and (4) academician. Data gathered through: 1) Observation; (2) In-depth interview; (3) Document; and 4) Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Data analyzedd by Miles and Huberman interactive analysis. This paper reveals that the village development planning was seen as a goal, when it was just a selected tool or process. Essential elements required to achieve public policy excellence: by strengthening the institutional capacity of the government through new dialogue space and community engagement through deliberative forum. It requires commitment, active community involvement, citizens' trust, and social networks.
Djohani (2008) Merumuskan Konsep dan Praktek Partisipasi Warga dalam Pelayanan Publik. Bandung: FPPM dan Ford Foundation.
Muluk MR K (2007) Menggugat Partisipasi Publik dalam Pemerintahan Daerah: Sebuah Kajian dengan Pendekatan Berpikir Sistem. Malang: Lembaga Penerbitan dan Dokumentasi FIA Universitas Brawijaya.
Denhardt J dan Denhardt R (2013) Pelayanan Publik Baru: Dari Manajemen Steering Ke Serving. Yogyakarta. Kreasi Wacana.
Islamy I (2004) Policy Analysis: Seri Monografi Kebijakan Publik. Malang: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Brawijaya.
Miles M dan Huberman M (1992) Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Neo B S & Chen G (2009) Dynamic Governance: Embedding Culture, Capabilities and Change in Singapore. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Nugroho R (2012) Public Policy. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Tresiana dan Duadji (2015) Laporan Kemajuan Hasil Penelitian Fundamental: Kegagalan Pemerintah Lokal dalam Pembangunan Era Otonomi Daerah (Kebijakan Deliberatif: Menggagas Multistakeholders Governance Body dalam Musrenbang Desa untuk Mewujudkan Kebijakan/Program Pembangunan Yang Unggul di Kabupaten Lampung Selatan Propinsi Lampung). Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Lampung: Tidak Diterbitkan.
Mariana P dan Nurasa (2010) Revitalisasi Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.