Dominasi dan ketidakadilan negara dan korporasi dalam kasus bencana lumpur Lapindo
Downloads
The domination of the state (government) and Corporate (PT LBI) in the oil and gas resource management lead Lapindo mudflow disaster that caused misery to the people. This study aims to assess the forms of domination and injustice by the state (government) and the corporation in the case of Lapindo mudflow disaster, and how Lapindo mudflow disaster victims negotiate (resist) against the state (government) and corporations in an effort to fight for their rights. This study used a qualitative approach with case study. Subjects and informants
research include: (1) Lapindo mudflow disaster victims; (2) group coordinator of Lapindo mudflow disaster victims; (3) Public figures Siring village, Tanggulangin, Renokenongo, Jabon, and Jatirejo, Porong district, Sidoarjo; (4) Representation of the corporation (PT. LBI); and (5) Representation of BPLS. The data collection process using the in-deepth interviews, observation, focus group discussions, and review documents. Stage processing and data analysis includes the coding process, memoing, and concept mapping. The results showed that the government (the state) and the corporation (PT LBI) action dominating the oil and gas resource management in the area of Porong district, Sidoarjo regency, East Java, resulting misery for the victims (people). Forms of injustice felt by residents Lapindo mudflow disaster victims not only related to the issue of compensation for land and building assets alone, but more than that, including various dimensions. Through a variety of collective action, such as demonstrations and negotiations, Lapindo mudflow disaster victims filed various charges, such as demands for payment of compensation for land and building assets destroyed.
Akbar AA (2012) Konspirasi SBY-Bakrie. Jakarta: INDOPETRO Publishing.
Babbie E (2008)The Belmont Basics of Social Research. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Chhosing Among Five Approaches. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Damsar (2010) Pengantar Sosiologi Politik. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Denzin NK & Lincoln YS (2009) Handbook of Qualitative Research (terj.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Febriasih HB (ed) (2009) Bisnis dan Demokrasi. Malang: Averroes Press.
Lovett FN (2001) Domination: A Preliminary Analysis. The Monist 84 (1): 98-112.
Marvasti AB (2004) Qualitative Research in Sociology: An Introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
Neuman WL (2007)Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Appoaches. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Patria N & Arief A (1999) Anronio Gramsci: Negara & Hegemoni. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Perkins J (2007) Membongkar Kejahatan Jaringan Internasional (Terjemahan: Confessions of An Economic Hit Man). Jakarta: UFUK Press.
Rais MA (2008) Agenda Mendesak Bangsa: Selamatkan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: PPSK Press.
Scott JC (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Sukmana O (2017) Pergulatan di Medan Lumpur: Potret Gerakan Sosial Korban Bencana Lumpur Lapindo dalam Melawan Dominasi Negara dan Korporasi. Malang: UMM Press.
Suka IG (2012) Dominasi Dalam Perspektif Teori Kritis. PUSTAKA, Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Budaya XII (1): 41-51.
Salim A (ed) (2001) Teori dan Paradigma Penelitan Sosial: Pemikiran Norman K. Denzin & Egon Guba, dan penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Yin RK (2011) Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: The Guilford Press.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
