Article Sidebar

Submitted
6 August 2020
Accepted
6 August 2020
Published
30 June 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 678 Download : 752

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the impact of stone size, location and stone composition the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of residual stone after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The design of this study was a retrospective that conducted between January 2012 until December 2016. The population in this study were all patients with residual stones post PCNL. Exclusion criteria were patients with multiple stones and patients with a history of previous treatment for residual stones such as nephroscopy, flexible ureterorenoscopy, ESWL or medical therapy). The variables studied in this study were stone size, stone location, and stone composition. Before ESWL was carried out, all patients underwent Kidney Ureter Bladder (KUB). After ESWL, all patients underwent ultrasonography (USG) and KUB to determine the stone clearance status. The sample of this study was 125 patients. The overall stone-free rate (SFR) of ESWL in managing post-PCNL residual stones is 72%. SFR based on stone size variable are 73.7% and 71.3% respectively for stones with a size = 5 mm and >5 mm (p = 0.78). SFR based on stone location variable was 67.1%, 75.8%, and 81.8% respectively for the residual stone located at the upper pole, middle pole and lower pole. There are no significant differences in the entire variable. This study concludes that ESWL can be used as effective additional management to treat post-PCNL residual stones with satisfactory SFR.

Keywords

Residual stone percutaneous nephrolithotomy extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Folia Medica Indonesiana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  • Folia Medica Indonesiana is a scientific peer-reviewed article which freely available to be accessed, downloaded, and used for research purposes. Folia Medica Indonesiana (p-ISSN: 2541-1012; e-ISSN: 2528-2018) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Manuscripts submitted to Folia Medica Indonesiana are published under the terms of the Creative Commons License. The terms of the license are:

    Attribution ” You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

    NonCommercial ” You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

    ShareAlike ” If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

    No additional restrictions ” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

    You  are free to :

    Share ” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.

    Adapt ” remix, transform, and build upon the material.

How to Cite
Sawal, Z., & Soebadi, D. M. (2020). Impact of Stone Size, Location, and Stone Composition on the Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Residual Stone after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Folia Medica Indonesiana, 56(2), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.20473/fmi.v56i2.21231
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aminsharifi A, Irani D, Amirzargar H (2018). Shock wave lithotripsy is more effective for residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy than for primary stones of the same size: a matched pair cohort study. Current Urology 12, 27-32
  2. Desai M, De Lisa A, Turna B, Rioja J, Walfridsson H, Addessi A, Wong C (2011). The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: Staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. International Braz J Urol, 37, 661
  3. Hamamoto S, Yasui T, Okada A, Taguchi K, Kawai N, Ando, R, et al (2014). Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for large calculi: simultaneous use of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy overcomes the disadvantageous of percutaneous nephrolithotomy nonotherapy. Journal of Endourology 28, 28-33
  4. Lee HY, Yang YH, Lee YL, Shen JT, Jang MY, Shih PMC, et al (2015). Noncontrast computed tomography factors that predict the renal stone outcome after shock wave lithotripsy. Clinical Imaging 39, 845-850
  5. Olvera-Posada D, Ali SN, Dion M, Alenezi H, Denstedt JD, Razvi H (2016). Natural history of residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evaluation of factors in related to clinical events and intervention. Urology 97, 46-50
  6. Opondo D, Gravas S, Joyce A, Pearle M, Matsuda T, Sun YH, et al (2014). Standardization of patient outcomes reporting in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Journal of Endourology 28, 767-774
  7. Pearle M, Lingeman J, Leveillee R, Kuo R, et al (2008). Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. Journal of Urology 179, S69-S73
  8. Rosette J de la, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, et al (2011). The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 Patients. Journal of Endourology 25, 11-17
  9. Xu G, Li X, He Y, He Z (2012). Staged single-tract minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of staghorn stone in patients with solitary kidney. Urological Research 40, 745-749
  10. Zhang L, Peng F, Yang L, Zhao X, Yang J, Zhang X (2009). Effect of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy on residual stones after different methods of surgery (abstract). Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 34, 634-637