Main Article Content

Abstract

Identification include fingerprint, property, medical, dental, serologic and exclusion methods. In the development, identification methods led to molecular forensics, a new field of science evolving since the 1980s, known as DNA fingerprinting. Specimens widely used in DNA assay for identification are blood spots/bloods, semen spots, vaginal swabs, buccal swabs and bones. In addition to these specimens, the last objects often used by the perpetrators/victims can be used, such as hearing aids (headsets/earphones). In its use, earphones are attached to the outer ear skin; thus, the earwax is suspected to adhere to the device. To date, in Indonesia personal identification is performed through swabs of earphones/headsets using the DNA profiling method. In particular, mitochondrial DNA has not been widely used for identification. The present study was of laboratory experimental. Earphones which have been used for 3 days were placed in room temperature for 1, 7, 14 and 20 days. Results showed that the environmental factor of exposure duration had an effect of a significant decrease in the levels of DNA from day 1 to day 20. Only 126-bp mtDNA (HVS II) was detected on the samples of day 1 and continued with sequencing. Mitochondrial DNA has better durability and relatively higher number of copies than those of nuclear DNA. This leads to greater possibility of success in amplification, given the higher number of mitochondrial DNA copies and the fact that mitochondrial DNA is a single locus that allows recombination.

Keywords

earphone swabs identification mtDNA

Article Details

How to Cite
Yudianto, A., Sispitasri, Y. E., & Margaret, N. (2017). ANALYSIS OF EARPHONE SWAB MITOCHONDRIAL DNA AS AN ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL FOR IDENTIFICATION EXAMINATION. Folia Medica Indonesiana, 52(3), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.20473/fmi.v52i3.5446

References

  1. Affoed RL and Caskey CT (1994). DNA analysis in forensic disease and animal identification. Curr Opin Biotech 5, 29-32
  2. Campbell KH, McWhir J, Ritchie WA, Wilmut I (1996). Sheep cloned by nucleartransfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380, 64-66
  3. Gabriel MN, Huffine EF, Ryan JH, Holland MM, Parsons (2001). Improved mtDNA sequence analysis of forensic remains using a "mini primer set” amplification strategy. J Forensic Sci 46, 247-253
  4. Idries AM (1997). Pedoman Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik, edisi pertama, Jakarta, Penerbit Binarupa Aksara
  5. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985). Individual-specific fingerprints of human DNA. Nature 316, 76-79
  6. Kusuma SE (2004). Perkembangan mutakhir deteksi paternitas dengan teknologi DNA. Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, Universitas Airlangga. Unpublished.
  7. Notosoehardjo I (2001). DNA Forensics: paternity test, past, present, and future. J For Scien VIII, 34-45
  8. Parsons Tj and Coble MD (2001). Increasing the forensic discrimination of mitochondrial DNA testing through analysis of the entire mitochondrial DNA genom. Croat Med J 42, 304-309
  9. Seo Y, Uchiyama T, Matsuda H, Shimizu K, Takami Y, Nakayama T, Takahama K (2002). Mitochondrial DNA and STR typing of matter adhering to an earphone. Journal of Forensic Science 47, 605-608
  10. Sullivan KM, Hopgood R, Gill P (1992). Identification of human remains by amplification and automated sequencing of mitochondrial DNA. Int J Legal Med 105, 83-86
  11. Syukriani Y (2012). DNA Forensik, Jakarta, PT Sagung
  12. Wallace DC (1997). Mitochondrial DNA variation in human evolution, degenerative disease and aging. American Journal of Human Genetic 57, 201-223

Most read articles by the same author(s)