Article Sidebar

Submitted
14 August 2017
Accepted
14 August 2017
Published
14 August 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2303 Download : 3984

Main Article Content

Abstract

The making of removable denture is performed by a dental laboratory. To facilitate the identification, according to Kennedy classification, classes are divided onto groups, the Kennedy class I, II, III and IV. To suit with the needs of the dental laboratory tasks commonly done, priority are necessary for common cases and should to be taught to students of Dental Health Technology Diploma. In Surabaya, research of various cases of removable partial denture with the various Kennedy classifications has never been done before. This study was to analyze the pattern of service for the removable partial denture manufacture in dental laboratory at Surabaya (2011 – 2013). The research is an observatory analytic. The population is all dental laboratories located around the campus of the Faculty of Dentistry Airlangga University Surabaya. The sample was the whole population is willing to become respondents. Sampling by total sampling. The method of collecting data using secondary data from a dental laboratory in Surabaya from 2011 until 2013. The note is cases removable denture according to the classification of Kennedy that Kennedy Class I, II, III and IV. Also of note kinds of materials used to make the denture base that is heat cured acrylic resins, thermoplastic resins and metals coherent. The data is a compilation table charting the frequency until needed, then analyzed using cross tabulation. Mostly denture type is flexible type and the least is metal framework. Most cases by classification Kennedy is followed by class II class III and class II and more recently is the fourth. In conclusion, in 2011 and 2013 the manufacture of removable partial dentures according to the classification of Kennedy Class III is the most common in both the upper arch and lower jaw, followed by Class II, Class I and Class IV. In 2012 which is the highest grade III followed by class II, class IV and class I. The denture type most used is a flexible denture, followed acrylic denture and the last is the metal framework.

Keywords

service utilization removable partial dentures dental laboratory

Article Details

License

  • Folia Medica Indonesiana is a scientific peer-reviewed article which freely available to be accessed, downloaded, and used for research purposes. Folia Medica Indonesiana (p-ISSN: 2541-1012; e-ISSN: 2528-2018) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Manuscripts submitted to Folia Medica Indonesiana are published under the terms of the Creative Commons License. The terms of the license are:

    Attribution ” You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

    NonCommercial ” You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

    ShareAlike ” If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

    No additional restrictions ” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

    You  are free to :

    Share ” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.

    Adapt ” remix, transform, and build upon the material.

How to Cite
Setyowati, O., & Kusdarjanti, E. (2017). ANALYSIS ON THE PATTERN OF USING THE SERVICE OF REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE MAKING IN A DENTAL LABORATORY IN SURABAYA. Folia Medica Indonesiana, 52(4), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.20473/fmi.v52i4.5474
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdel-Rahman HK, Tahir CD, Saleh MM (2013). Incidence of partial edentulism and its relation with age and gender. Zanco J Med Sci 17, 463-470
  2. Abdulhadi LM (2013). Appraisal of removable partial denture service in a dental faculty for (2005-2010). A retrospective study. Proceedings of the 2013 Inter-national conference on Biology and Biomedicine, Kuala lumpur, p 59-66
  3. Chittaranjan B, Kar AK, Taruna M, Sudhir N (2009). Management of a case of partial eden-tulism with esthetic flexible dentures. IJDA 1, 60-62
  4. Craig RG (2002). Restorative Dental Material, St Louis, Mosby, p 636
  5. Curtis DA (1992). Incidence of various classes of removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 67, 664-67
  6. Farias-Neto A, da Silva SG, Diniz AC, et al (2012). Ethics in the provision of removable partial dentures. Braz J Oral Sci 11, 19-24
  7. Jeyapalan V and Krishnan CS (2015). Partial edentulism and its correlation to age, gender, socio-economic status and incidence of various Kennedy's classes–a literature review. J Clin Diagn Res 9, 14–17
  8. Judy HJAL (2009). The incidence of frequency of a various removable partial edentulism cases. MDJ 6, 172-177
  9. Kaira LS, Dayakara HR, Singh R (2012). Flexible denture for partially edentulous arches. Journal of Dentofacial Sciences 1, 39-42
  10. Keenan PL, Radford DR, Clark RK (2003). Dimensional change in complete dentures fabricated by injection molding and microwave processing. J Prosthet Dent 89, 37-44
  11. Keyf F (2001). Frequency of the various classes of removable partial dentures and selection of major connector and direct/indirect retainers. Turk J Med Sci 31, 445-449
  12. Lowe LG (2004). Flexible Denture flanges for patients exhibiting undercut tuberosities and reduced width of the buccal vestibule: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 92, 128-131
  13. Martin S (2004). Partial denture. Available from http://www.doctorspiller.com/partial_dentures.htm. Accessed February 04, 2014
  14. Muneeb A (2013). Causes and pattern of partial edentulism/ exodontia and its association with age and gender: semi rural population. IDJSR 1, 13–18
  15. Negrutiu M, Sinescu C, Romanu M, Pop D, Lakatos S (2005). Thermoplastic resins for flexible framework removable partial dentures. TMJ 55, 295-299
  16. Owall BE and Taylor RL (1989). A survey of dentition and removable partial dentures constructed for patients in North America. J Prosthet Dent 61, 466–470
  17. Parvizi A, Lindquist T, Schneider R, Williamson D, Boyer D, Dawson DV (2004). comparison of the dimensional accuracy of injection-molded denture base materials to that of conventional pressure-pack acrylic resin. J Prosthodont 13, 83-89
  18. Patel JY, Vohra MY, Hussain JM (2014). Assessment of partially edentulous patients based on Kennedy's classification and its relation with Gender Predi-lection. International Journal of Scientific Study 2, 32–36
  19. Phoenix RD, Mansueto MA, Ackerman NA, Jones RE (2004). Evaluation of Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Commonly Used Denture Base resins. J Prosthodont 13, 17-27
  20. Prabhu N, Kumar S, D'souza M, Hegde V (2009). Partial edentulousness in a rural population based on Kennedy's classification: an epidemiological study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 9 (1):18–23
  21. Pun DK (2010). Incidence of removable partial denture types in eastern Wisconsin. Available from http://epublication.marquette. edu/theses_open/46. Accessed February 04, 2014
  22. Radhi A, Lynch CD, Hanningan A (2007). Quality of written communication and master impressions for fabrication of removable partial prostheses in the Kingdom of Bahrain. J Oral Rehabil 34, 153-157
  23. Shamnur SN, Jagadeesh KN, Kalavathi SD, Kashinath KR (2011). Flexible dentures – an alternate for rigid dentures. Journal of Dental Sciences & Research 1, 74-79
  24. Thean HP and Paine JA (1996). The use of removable partial dentures amongst private dental practitioners in Singapore. Singapore Dental Journal 21, 26-30