Isu Laut Tiongkok Selatan: Negara-negara ASEAN Terbelah Menghadapi Tiongkok

Arief Bakhtiar Darmawan, Lady Mahendra

Abstract views = 1160 times | downloads = 4049 times


This paper aims to analyze the strategies of each ASEAN member states towards China related to the dispute in the South China Sea (SCS). SCS area is becoming a platform of power competition between China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei. Five parties mentioned above are competing over sovereignty in certain areas of the SCS. SCS area became interesting to certain parties, considering its strategic value for expansive policy. In the contemporary era, the rise of this conflict perceived as a problem which caused by shifting balance of power, that happened when the U.S. sought to preserve its unilateral moment after the end of cold war. This lead to vacuum of power situation in the Southeast Asia, thus encourage China to build up presence in the dispute area. Even though there are only four ASEAN countries that directly involved, however the adoption of the Declaration on the SCS by all ASEAN member countries, asserted that in this case ASEAN is standing together to show their objections of China’s aggressiveness. With structural realism perspective as the analysis tool, tendencies of ASEAN member states’ different strategies are understandable by the explanation about motives behind it. Which Philippines and Vietnam tend to leaning towards balancing strategy against China. Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar indicate towards bandwagoning strategy with China, while the rest of the members did not show tendencies of leaning either ways.


South China Sea dispute, ASEAN, China, structural realism, balancing and bandwagoning strategy

Full Text:



Buku, Jurnal, dan Dokumentasi Resmi

Acharya, Amitav, 2017. “The Evolution and Limitations pf ASEAN Identity”, dalam Aileen Baviera & Larry Maramis (eds.), 2017, 25-38. ASEAN@50 Volume 04: Building ASEAN Community: Political-Security and Socio-cultural Reflections. Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.

Baviera, Aileen S.P., 1999. “China’s Relation with Southeast Asian:Politic Securiy and Economic Interest”, Discussion Paper of Philippine APEC Study Center Network (PASCN), No. 99-17.

Buszynski, Leszek, 2003. “ASEAN, the Declaration on Counduct, and the South China Sea”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 25(3): 343-362.

Chung, Christopher, 2009. “Southeast Asia and the South China Sea Dispute”, dalam Bateman, Sam & Ralf Emmers (eds.), 2009. Security and International Politics in the South China Sea Towards a Cooperative Management Regime,Routledge. New York: Routledge.

Ciorciari, John D., & Jessice Chen Weiss, 2012. “The Sino-Vietnamese Standoff in the South China Sea”, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 61-69.

Darmawan, Arief Bakhtiar & Gebyar Lintang Ndadari, 2017. “Keterlibatan Amerika Serikat dalam Sengketa Laut Tiongkok Selatan pada Masa Pemerintahan Barack Obama”, Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 6(1).

Djalal, Hasjim, 2009. “The South China Sea: The long road towards peace and cooperation”, dalam Bateman, Sam & Ralf Emmers (eds.), 2009. Security and International Politics in the South China Sea Towards a Cooperative Management Regime,Routledge. New York: Routledge.

Finkbeiner, John, 2013. Malaysia’s Great Power Balance and the South China Sea Disputes. Philadelphia: United States Army War College.

Haryanto, Agus, & Arief Bakhtiar Darmawan, 2015. “Sengketa Laut Tiongkok Selatan: Ancaman bagi Komunitas Keamanan ASEAN?”, Jurnal Global & Strategis, 9(2): 277-292.

Jitsuchon, Somchai, 2012. “Thailand Achieving Social-Economic Development Balance‟, dalam Yunling, Zhang, Fukunari Kimura & Sothea Oum (eds.), 2012. Moving Toward a New Development Model for East Asia-The Role of Domestic Policy and Regional Cooperation. Jakarta: ERIA Research Project Report.

Kementrian Luar Negeri RI, 2011. Pidato Presiden: Sambutan pada Acara Penutupan KTT Ke-19 ASEAN. Nusa Dua, Bali: Penulis.

Lee, Hochul, 2017. “Power Politics Behind the Transforming Geopolitics in East Asia”, East Asia: An International Quarterly, 34(132): 1-14.

Lobell, Steven E., 2010, “Structural Realism/Offensive and Defensive Realism”, dalam Denemark, Robert A. (ed.), 2010. The International Studies Encyclopedia Volume X. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Mearsheimer, John J., 2007. “Structural Realism”, dalam Dunne, Tim, Milija Kurki, & Steve Smith (eds.), 2007. International Relation Theories Discipline and Diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.

Odgaard, Lisolette, 2003. “The South China Sea: ASEAN’s Security Concerns About China”, Security Dialogue, 34(1): 292-306.

Roberts, Christopher, 2017. “The South China Sea: Beijing’s Challenge to ASEAN and UNCLOS and the Necessity of a New Multi-tiered Approach”, RSIS Working Paper, No. 307. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.

Russett, Bruce, 1967. International Regions and the International System; A Study in Political Ecology. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.

Schwab, Klaus (ed.), 2017. The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

Selth, Andrew, 2007. “Chinese Military Bases in Burma: The Explosion of a Myth”, Regional Outlook Paper of Griffith Asia Institute , No. 10.

Shaohua, Ma, 2006. China’s Multilateralism and the South China Sea Conflict: Quest for Hegemonic Stability? Tesis Pascasarjana. Singapore: National University of Singapore.

Shoji, Tomotaka, 2011. “Vietnam, ASEAN, and the South China Sea: Unity or D iverseness?”, NIDS Security Studies, 14(1): 3-21.

Thayer, Carlyle A., 2013. Indonesia’s Efforts to Forge ASEAN Unity on a Code of Conduct. Washington: CSIS.

Thayer, Carlyle A., 2012. “ASEAN’s Code of Conduct in the South China Sea: A Litmus Test for a Community Building”, The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 10(4): 1-22.

Thayer, Carlyle A., 2011. “China-ASEAN and the South China Sea: Chinese Assertiveness and Southeast Asian Responses”, Paper to international conference on Major and Policy Issues in the South China Sea: European and American Perspectives.

Tønnesson, Stein, 2001. “An International History of The Dispute in the South China Sea”, EAI Working Paper, No. 71.

Vaughn, Bruce & Wayne M. Morrison, 2006. ‟China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States.” Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, 4 April.

Walt, Stephen Martin, 2007. “Alliances: Balancing And Bandwagoning”, dalam Art, Robert J. & Robert Jervis (eds.), 2007. International Politics: Enduring Concepts and Contemporary Issues. New York: Pearson/ Longman.

Weatherbee, Donald E., 2005. International Relations in Southeast Asia The Struggle for Autonomy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Yeneza, Christine Marie, 2012. “The Spratly’s Conflict: Foreign Policy Implications to the Peoples’ Republic of China and the Republic of the Philippines”, JPAIR Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(1).

Zhiguo, Gao, 2005. “South China Sea: Turning Suspicion into Mutual Understanding and Cooperation”, dalam Saw Swee-Hock, Sheng Lijun, and Chin Kin Wah (eds.), 2005. ASEAN-China Relations: Realities and Prospects. Singapura: ISEAS Publishing.


Bank Negara Malaysia, 2009. “Economic Developments in 2009” [online]. [diakses 1 Januari 2018].

Chen, Dene-Hern, 2012. “South China Sea Dispute off ASEA N Summit Agenda.” The Cambodia Daily [online]. [diakses 2 Januari 2018].

Chongkittavorn, Kavi, 2012. “Thailand Walks A Tightrope on South China Sea” [online]. [diakses 1 Januari 2018].

Heydarian, Richard Javad, 2012. “Brunei in the South China Sea Hot Seat” [online]. [diakses 2 Januari 2018].

International Monetary Fund, 2016. “World Economic Outlook Database” [online]. [diakses 26 Desember 2017].

Kaplan, Robert D., 2011. “The South China Sea is the Future of Conflict.” Foreign Policy [online]. ina_sea_is_the_future_of_conflict?page=0,0 [diakses 26 Desember 2017].

Penna, Michele, 2013. “Little, Landlocked Laos: Pawn or Pivot in Asia’s Future?” Asian Correspondent [online]. [diakses 2 Januari 2018].

Sarith, Heng, 2013. “A Job Well Done: Cambodia as ASEAN Chair in 2012” [online]. [diakses 2 Januari 2018].

Senate of The Philippines & Senate Economic Planning Office, 2012. “Philippine Agriculture Exports at a Glance” [online]. [diakses 2 Januari 2018].

Storey, Ian, 2013. “Presentation of Dr. Ian Storey at the Angara Centre Forum on Maritime Disputes.” Angara Centre for Law and Economics [online]. https://www. [diakses 27 Desember 2017].

The Associated Press, 2010. “Vietnam’s Cam Ranh Base to Welcome Foreign Navies”, The Washington Post [online]. [diakses 2 Januari 2018].

Trading Economics, 2016. “Malaysia Military Expenditure” [online]. [diakses 1 Januari 2017].

Tran, Duvien & Khanh Vu Duc, 2013. “ASEAN as pawn in great power game” [online]. [diakses 2 Januari 2018].

World Bank, 2017. “The World Bank in Vietnam” [online]. [diakses 2 Januari 2018].

Zhida, Jiang, 2013. “Brunei’s Burden”, China Institute of International Studies [online]. [diakses 2 Januari 2018].


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Global & Strategis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Global Strategis

Ruang Cakra Buana Catur Matra
C102 Gedung C FISIP Universitas Airlangga
Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam Selatan, Surabaya 60286



Creative Commons License
Global Strategis journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Indexed by: