Political Connection, Financial Distress and Cost of Debt: Empirical Evidence from Emerging Country
Downloads
Objective: This study aims to investigate the impact of political connections on financial distress and the firm's cost of debt.
Design/Methods/Approach: The research sample is all companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2021, with 3072 observations obtained from OSIRIS Database. This study uses a quantitative approach with panel data regression analysis using E-Views 12 software program to test the hypothesis.
Findings: The results indicate that political connections significantly adversely affect financial distress, while political connections do not affect the cost of debt. In addition, this study also divides companies based on the nature of their political connections. Companies with political connections from the central government, local government, and the military affect financial distress. Meanwhile, only political connections from executive government employees and political connections from families affect the company's cost of debt.
Originality: This research developed the political connection based on its nature to measure the effect of political connection on financial distress and the cost of debt. It extends the previous understanding of the impact of political connections.
Policy implication: The findings are relevant for companies and other stakeholders to be more aware and utilize political connections to make better decisions and for the government to develop guidelines for better disclosure of political connections.
Ahmad, A. H., Abdullah, N. A. H., & Mohd, K. N. T. (2022). Predicting Restructuring Outcomes of Financially Distressed Firms in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Management, 16(1), 107–118.
Ahmad, A. H., Hiau Abdullah, N. A., & Taufil Mohd, K. N. (2018). Market reactions to financial distress announcements: Do political connections matter? Cogent Economics and Finance, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1483304
Almarhabi, H. H., Ahmed, K., & Mather, P. (2022). Enduring corporate political connections and loan contracting: evidence from the GCC countries. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 19(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-08-2021-0117
Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and The Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x
Altman, E. I., Hotchkiss, E., & Wang, W. (2019). Corporate Financial Distress, Restructuring, and Bankruptcy: Analyze Leveraged Finance, Distressed Debt, and Bankruptcy (Fourth Edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Arifin, T., Hasan, I., & Kabir, R. (2020). Transactional and relational approaches to political connections and the cost of debt. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101768
Azmi, N. A., Zakaria, N. B., Sata, F. H. A., & Sanusi, Z. M. (2020). Political connection and firm's performance among Malaysian firms. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(3), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n3p146
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia Triwulan IV-2022. https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2023/02/06/1997/ekonomi-indonesia-tahun-2022-tumbuh-5-31-persen.html#:~:text=Ekonomi%20Indonesia%20tahun%202022%20tumbuh%20sebesar%205%2C31%20persen%2C%20lebih,Pergudangan%20sebesar%2019%2C87%20persen.
Bliss, M. A., & Gul, F. A. (2012a). Political connection and cost of debt: Some Malaysian evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(5), 1520–1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.12.011
Bliss, M. A., & Gul, F. A. (2012b). Political connection and leverage: Some Malaysian evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(8), 2344–2350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.04.012
Borisova, G., Fotak, V., Holland, K., & Megginson, W. L. (2015). Government ownership and the cost of debt: Evidence from government investments in publicly traded firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 118(1), 168–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.06.011
Boubakri, N., Ghoul, S. El, & Saffar, W. (2013). Cash holdings of politically connected firms. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 23(4), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2013.06.002
Bryan, D., Dinesh Fernando, G., & Tripathy, A. (2013). Bankruptcy risk, productivity, and firm strategy. Review of Accounting and Finance, 12(4), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-06-2012-0052
Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1–2), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.07.003
Chkir, I., & Toukabri, M. (2022). Do politically connected firms borrow cheaply? Evidence from two postspost-U.S. election campaigns. Applied Economics Letters, 29(3), 200–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1861194
Ding, S., Jia, C., Wilson, C., & Wu, Z. (2015). Political connections and agency conflicts: The roles of owner and manager political influence on executive compensation. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 45(2), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-014-0441-9
Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704
Gippel, J., Smith, T., & Zhu, Y. (2015). Endogeneity in Accounting and Finance Research: Natural Experiments as a State-of-the-Art Solution. Abacus, 51(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12048
Halford, J. T., & Li, C. (2020). Political connections and debt restructurings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65, 101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101497
Harijanto, G. S., & Supatmi, S. (2022). Pengaruh Dewan Terkoneksi Politik terhadap Cost of Debt pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia. Nominal: Barometer Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 11(2), 196–209. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v11i2.46877
Harymawan, I. (2018). Why do firms appoint former military personnel as directors? Evidence of loan interest rate in militarily connected firms in Indonesia. Asian Review of Accounting, 26(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-07-2016-0086
Harymawan, I., Agustia, D., & Agung, A. K. (2017). Characteristics of politically connected firms in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(4), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(4).2017.02
He, Y., Xu, L., & McIver, R. P. (2019). How does political connection affect firm financial distress and resolution in China? Applied Economics, 51(26), 2770–2792. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1558358
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469
Idris, F., Buchdadi, A. D., Muttaqien, M. R., & Hariguna, T. (2020). The role of the board of directors with political connections for increasing the firm value. Accounting, 6(7), 1285–1290. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.8.023
Istan, M. (2021). Political Supports and Financial Distress of Companies in Indonesia. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 10(2), 132–142. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/edaj
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Johnson Jr, B. L. (1995). Resource Dependence Theory: A Political Economy Model of Organizations [University of Utah]. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED387871
Joni, J., Ahmed, K., & Hamilton, J. (2020). Politically connected boards, family and business group affiliations, and cost of capital: Evidence from Indonesia. British Accounting Review, 52(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100878
Junus, O., Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., & Anshori, M. (2022). Politically Connected Independent Commissioners and Independent Directors on the Cost of Debt. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(2), 41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs10020041
Kalbuana, N., Taqi, M., Uzliawati, L., & Ramdhani, D. (2022). The Effect of Profitability, Board Size, Women on Boards, and Political Connection on Financial Distress Conditions. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2142997
Kharis, J. B., & Nugrahanti, Y. W. (2022). Board Diversity, Koneksi Politik dan Financial Distress. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 32(8), 1987–2003. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2022.v
Khelil, I. (2023). Political connections and cost of debt: a meta-analysis. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-11-2022-0413
Le, B. (2020). The impact of government ownership on the cost of debt and valuation of Vietnamese listed companies. Pacific Accounting Review, 32(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-07-2019-0083
Liedong, T. A., & Rajwani, T. (2018). The impact of managerial political ties on corporate governance and debt financing: Evidence from Ghana. Long Range Planning, 51(5), 666–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.006
Ling, L., Zhou, X., Liang, Q., Song, P., & Zeng, H. (2016). Political connections, overinvestments, and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese listed real estate firms. Finance Research Letters, 18, 328–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.05.009
Mikrefin, N. (2022, January 25). Skor Indeks Persepsi Korupsi RI 38, di Bawah Angka Rata-Rata Global. Katadata.Co.Id. https://katadata.co.id/yuliawati/berita/61efb424a672f/skor-indeks-persepsi-korupsi-ri-38-di-bawah-angka-rata-rata-global
Min Kyung Park, & Seong Il Jeon. (2020). The effect of politically connected outside directors on the relationship between stock price crash risk and the cost of debt. Korean Accounting Review, 45(6), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.24056/KAR.2020.08.001
Nguyen, T. X., Hoang, K., Nguyen, C. C., & Bach, T. N. (2021). Do different political connections affect firms' distress risk differently? International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(2), 376–398. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2020-0874
Niessen, A., & Ruenzi, S. (2010). Political connectedness and firm performance: Evidence from Germany. German Economic Review, 11(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2009.00482.x
Nugrahanti, Y. W., Sutrisno, T., Rahman, A. F., & Mardiati, E. (2020). Do firm characteristics, political connections, and corporate governance mechanisms affect financial distress? (Evidence from Indonesia). International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 13(2), 220–250. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2020.106753
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara, (2014).
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
Ramly, S. H., Rura, Y., & Rasyid, S. (2019). Predicting Financial Distress and Financial Performance Using Political Connection. ICAME, 220–226.
Saeed, A., Belghitar, Y., & Clark, E. (2015). Political Connections and Leverage: Firm-level Evidence from Pakistan. Managerial and Decision Economics, 36(6), 364–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2674
Seppa, R. (2014). Implication of inside-debt: Signalling for bankruptcy probabilities within small firms. Baltic Journal of Management, 9(2), 168–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-03-2013-0043
Setiawan, R., & Navianti, D. R. (2020). CEO Gender and Firm Debt Policy: An Empirical Study in Indonesia. 3rd Global Conference On Business, Management, and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2018), 93–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200131.020
Setiawan, R., & Rachmansyah, A. B. (2019). Determinan Cash Holdings Perusahaan: Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia. Arthavidya: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, 21(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37303/a.v21i1.121
Shah, A. (2014). Constraining consolidation: military politics and democracy in Pakistan (2007–2013). Democratization, 21(6), 1007–1033. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.781586
Tao, Q., Sun, Y., Zhu, Y., & Yang, X. (2017). Political Connections and Government Subsidies: Evidence from Financially Distressed Firms in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(8), 1854–1868. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2017.1332592
Tee, C. M. (2018). Political connections and the cost of debt: Re-examining the evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 46, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2018.05.003
Tee, C. M. (2019). Political connections, the cost of debt and board attributes: evidence from Malaysia. Managerial Finance, 45(7), 842–855. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-04-2018-0179
Wang, B., Li, Y., Xuan, W., & Wang, Y. (2022). Internal Control, Political Connection, and Executive Corruption. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(2), 3340–3354. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1952069
Wellalage, N. H., Thrikawala, S., & Ghardallou, W. (2022). Political connections, family ownership, and access to bank credit. Finance Research Letters, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103347
Widodo, A., & Fanani, Z. (2020). Military Background, Political Connection, Audit Quality, and Earning Quality. Jurnal Akuntansi, 24(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v24i1.658
Wijantini, & Afsal, E. M. (2007). A test of the relationship between political connection and indirect costs of financial distress in Indonesia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), 3(2), 61–81.
Wong, W. Y., & Hooy, C. W. (2018). Do types of political connections affect firm performance differently? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 51, 297-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.08.009
Wu, B., Liang, H., & Chan, S. (2022). Political Connections, Industry Entry Choice and Performance Volatility: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(1), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1904878
Copyright (c) 2023 Antonius Arya Hadiputra, Windijarto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The author(s) hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The author(s) retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
