Servant Leadership’s Impact on Green Behavior: Exploring Psychological Empowerment and Autonomous Motivation for the Environment in the Energy Sector
Downloads
Objective: This study aims to understand the influence of servant leadership on employees’ voluntary green behavior and green innovative work behavior, with psychological empowerment and autonomous motivation for the environment playing a role as sequential mediators in the energy sector.
Design/Method/Approach: Data was gathered through an online questionnaire sent to potential participants. A total of 328 eligible respondents were collected for analysis. This study utilized Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modelling (CB-SEM) to examine the connections between servant leadership, psychological empowerment, autonomous motivation for the environment, employees’ voluntary green behavior, and green innovative work behavior.
Findings: A servant leader who influences employees' voluntary green behavior and green innovative work behavior must build psychological empowerment and autonomous motivation for the environment. In line with previous research, the role of mediation, psychological empowerment, and autonomous motivation for the environment simultaneously strengthen servant leaders to form environmentally friendly behavior.
Originality: The novelty of this study lies in adding the variable green innovative work behavior as a dependent variable that can be influenced by servant leadership. Previous studies have not combined green innovative work behavior with psychological aspects, including psychological empowerment and autonomous motivation for the environment. This research is conducted in the energy sector, which is expected to yield diverse results depending on the influencing factors.
Practical/Policy implication: Based on the findings, leaders, and management should promptly consider implementing employee development through servant leadership interventions. In the era of energy transition, these behaviors are crucial, with servant leadership, psychological empowerment, and autonomous motivation for the environment playing pivotal roles. Implementing these practices meets green bond criteria, indicating the company's commitment to environmentally friendly practices and enhances its reputation as an environmentally responsible entity, attracting stakeholders supportive of such initiatives.
Aboramadan, M., Kundi, Y. M. & Farao, C. (2021). Examining the effects of environmentally-specific servant leadership on green work outcomes among hotel employees: the mediating role of climate for green creativity. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 30(8), 929–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.191268.
Aboramadan, M. (2020). The effect of green HRM on employee green behaviors in higher education: the mediating mechanism of green work engagement. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(1), 7–23. https://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2075/10.1108/IJOA-05-2020-2190
Ahmed, F., Faraz, N.A., Xiong, Z. & Ma, Y. (2023). The multilevel interplay of responsible leadership with leader identification and autonomous motivation to cultivate voluntary green behavior. Asia Pac J Manag. https://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2075/10.1007/s10490-023-09893-6.
Amabile, T. M., & Gitomer, J. (1984). Children’s artistic creativity: Effects of choice in task materials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(2), 209–215.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167.
Amrutha, V. N. & Geetha, S. N. (2021). Linking organizational green training and voluntary workplace green behavior: Mediating role of green supporting climate and employees’ green satisfaction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125876, ISSN 0959-6526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125876.
Arici, H. E., & Uysal, M. (2022). Leadership, green innovation, and green creativity: a systematic review. The Service Industries Journal, 42:5-6, 280-320, DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2021.1964482.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191 –215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
Bantha, T. & Nayak, U. (2020). The relation of workplace spirituality with employees’ innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Indian Business Research, 13(2), 223–235. https://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2075/10.1108/JIBR-03-2020-0067.
Baykal, E., & Zehir, C. (2018). Mediating effect of psychological capital on the relationship between spiritual leadership and performance. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 21(3), 124–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2018-3-008
Bird, L., & Womble, J. (2024). State of the US Clean Energy Transition: Recent Progress, and What Comes Next. Retrieved from: https://www.wri.org/insights/clean-energy-progress-united-states.
Blasco-Giner, C., Battistelli, A., Meneghel, I., & Salanova, M. (2023). Psychological Capital, Autonomous Motivation and Innovative Behavior: A Study Aimed at Employees in Social Networks. Psychological Reports, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231183614
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
Bodansky, D. (2021). Paris Agreement. Retrieved from: https://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/pa/pa_e.pdf.
Boiral, O. (2009). Greening the corporation through organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 87, 221–236.
Budzanowska-Drzewiecka, M., & Tutko, M. (2021). The impact of individual motivation on employee voluntary pro-environmental behaviours: The motivation towards the environment of polish employees, motivation behind employee green behaviours. Management of Environmental Quality, 32(5), 929–948. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2020-0268.
Burch, S. W. (2018). Leadership and basic psychological needs: An exploration of how leaders can support autonomous forms of motivation through servant leadership and authentic leadership (Order No. 13427125). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2176042488). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/leadership-basic-psychological-needs-exploration/docview/2176042488/se-2.
Canavesi, A., & Minelli, E. (2021). Servant Leadership and Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 34, 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-021-09389-9. .
Cavina, T., et. al. (2023). Five key action areas to put Europe’s energy transition on a more orderly path. Retrieved from: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/five-key-action-areas-to-put-europes-energy-transition-on-a-more-orderly-path.
Chandak, P. (2023). Indonesia and US Signs MoU for Clean Energy Working Group. Retrieved from: https://solarquarter.com/2023/03/22/indonesia-and-us-signs-mou-for-clean-energy-working-group/.
Daily, B. F., Bishop, J. W., & Govindarajulu, N. (2009). A Conceptual Model for Organizational Citizenship Behavior Directed Toward the Environment. Business & Society, 48(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650308315439.
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H. & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: The State of a Science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108.
Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. Springer: New York, NY, USA.
Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1449618.
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Deng, A., Zarrett, N. & Sweeney, A. M. (2024). The mediating effects of motivation on the relations between occupational stress and physical activity among underresourced afterschool program staff. BMC Public Health, pp. 24, 327. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17800-x.
Derkach, A., Fantaguzzi, I., Pearse, N. & Smith, M. (2023). Powering Up New Leadership for A Changing Energy Environment. Retrieved from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/powering-up-new-leadership-for-a-changing-energy-environment#/.
Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and Procedural Justice Climate as Antecedents of Unit-Level Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 61–94. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/leadership-procedural-justice-climate-as/docview/220146507/se-2.
European Council. (2019). Council of The European Union: European Green Deal. Retrieved from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/green-deal/.
Eva, N., et, al. (2019). Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30, 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004.
Faraz, N. A., Ahmed, F., Ying, M. & Mehmood. (2021). The interplay of green servant leadership, self-efficacy, and intrinsic motivation in predicting employees’ pro-environmental behavior. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), 1171–1184. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2115.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.
GreenLeaf. (1970). The Servant as a Leader (1970th ed.). IN: Indianapolis.
Gupta, V. (2020). Relationships between leadership, motivation and employee-level innovation: evidence from India. Personnel Review, 49(7),1363–1379. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2019-0595.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed). England: Cengage.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2016). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed). England: Pearson Education.
Han, Z., Wang, Q., & Yan, X. (2019). How Responsible Leadership Motivates Employees to Engage in Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment: A Double-Mediation Model. Sustainability, 11(3), 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030605.
Hyvönen, J., Kiovunen, T., & Syri, S. (2023). Possible bottleneck in clean energy transitions: Overview and modelled effects – Case Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137317.
IEA. (2023). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Energy Data Explorer, IEA, Paris. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-energy-data-explorer.
IEA. (2023). Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations in Net Zero Transitions, IEA, Paris. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/emissions-from-oil-and-gas-operations-in-net-zero-transitions, License: CC BY 4.0.
IEA (2022), An Energy Sector Roadmap to Net Zero Emissions in Indonesia, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/an-energy-sector-roadmap-to-net-zero-emissions-in-indonesia, License: CC BY 4.0.
IESR. (2022). Financing Indonesia’s Coal Phase-Out: A just and accelerated retirement pathway to net-zero. https://iesr.or.id/pustaka/pembiayaan-phase-out-pltu-batubara-indonesia.
Indonesia Energy Transition Outlook. (2022). Tracking Progress of Energy Transition in Indonesia: Pursuing Energy Security in the Time of Transition. Jakarta: Institute for Essential Services Reform (IESR).
International Labour Organization. (2023). Green Jobs and Just Transition Readiness Assessment in the Energy Sector in Indonesia. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/documents/publication/wcms_888170.pdf.
Iqbal, A., Latif, K. F., & Ahmad, M. S. (2020). Servant Leadership and Employee Innovative Behaviour: Exploring psychological pathways. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 813–827.
Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Muhmmad, A. Z., Adnan, u. H., & Rubab, U. (2019). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Management and Organization, 25(4), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.50.
Jin, Y., Jibao, G., & Hefu, L. (2019). Servant leadership and employee creativity: The roles of psychological empowerment and work. Current psychology, 38(6), 1417–1427. 10.1007/s12144-019-0161-3.
Kanat-Maymon, Y., Elimelech, M., & Roth, G. (2020). Work motivations as antecedents and outcomes of leadership: Integrating self-determination theory and the full range leadership theory. European Management Journal, 38(4), 555–564.
Khan, M. M., et, al. (2021). How Servant Leadership Triggers Innovative Work Behavior: Exploring the sequential mediating role of psychological empowerment and job crafting. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(4), 1037–1055.
Khan, M. M., et, al. (2022). Innovation with Flow at Work: Exploring the role of servant leadership in affecting innovative work behavior through flow at work. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(8), 1267–1281.
Kim, M., & Lee, S. M. (2022). Drivers and interrelationships of three types of pro-environmental behaviors in the workplace. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(5), 1854–1881. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2021-1094.
Kohnen, D., et, al. (2024). Engaging leadership and nurse well-being: the role of the work environment and work motivation-a cross-sectional study. Human Resources for Health, 22(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-023-00886-6.
Lamm, E., Tosti-Kharas, J., & King, C.E. (2015). Empowering Employee Sustainability: Perceived Organizational Support Toward the Environment. J Bus Ethics, 128, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2093-z.
Li, Z., Xue, J., Li, R., Chen, H. & Wang, T. (2020). Environmentally Specific Transformational Leadership and Employee‚ Pro-environmental Behavior: The Mediating Roles of Environmental Passion and Autonomous Motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01408.
Li, Y., Wei, F., Ren, S., & Di, Y. (2015). Locus of control, psychological empowerment and intrinsic motivation relation to performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(4), 422–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-10-2012-0318.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant Leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.006.
Liden, R. C., et, al. (2015). Servant Leadership: Validation of A Short Form of the SL-28. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.002.
Limanseto, H. (2022). Kerja Sama Bilateral Indonesia – Jepang: Optimis Wujudkan Asia sebagai Pemimpin Proses Transisi Energi Global. Retrieved from: https://ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/4757/kerja-sama-bilateral-indonesia-jepang-optimis-wujudkan-asia-sebagai-pemimpin-proses-transisi-energi-global.
Liu, G., Peng, H., & Wen, H. (2023). How self-leadership promotes job crafting: Based on the perspective of self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 14.
Liu, R., Yue, Z., Ijaz, A., Lutfi, A., & Mao, J. (2023). Sustainable Business Performance: Examining the Role of Green HRM Practices, Green Innovation and Responsible Leadership through the Lens of Pro-Environmental Behavior. Sustainability, 15(9), 7317. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097317.
Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2023). FOLU Net Sink: Indonesia’s Climate Actions Towards 2030. Retrieved from: https://www.menlhk.go.id/uploads/site/post/1681109460.pdf.
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. (2022). Handbook of Energy & Economic Statistics of Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian ESDM.
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. (2020). Inventarisasi Emisi GRK Bidang Energi. Jakarta: Kementerian ESDM.
National Energy Council. (2023). Rencana Strategis DEN 2021-2025. Retrieved from: https://den.go.id/publikasi/rencana-strategis#.
Neway, H. M., & Mulugeta, G. K. (2022). The mediating role of psychological empowerment in the relationship between empowering leadership, and engagement and innovative work behaviour. International Journal on Leadership, 10(1), 14–28. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/mediating-role-psychological-empowerment/docview/2833745867/se-2.
Newman, A., et al. (2017). How Servant Leadership Influences Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The roles of LMX, empowerment, and proactive personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 49–62.
Norton, T. A., Parker, S. L., Zacher, H., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2015). Employee Green Behavior: A Theoretical Framework, Multilevel Review, and Future Research Agenda. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 103–125. https://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2075/10.1177/1086026615575773.
Opoku, M. A., Choi, S. B., & Kang, S. W. (2019). Servant Leadership and Innovative Behaviour: An Empirical Analysis of Ghana’s Manufacturing Sector. Sustainability, 11, 6273. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226273.
Palmer, I., et al. (2017). Managing Organizational Change 3rd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K. M., Green-Demers, I., Noels, K., & Beaton, A. M. (1998). Why are you doing things for the environment? The Motivation Toward the Environment Scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(5), 437–468.
Permana, S. H. (2023). Tantangan Investasi Energi Baru dan Energi Terbarukan menuju Indonesia Net Zero Emission. Retrieved from: https://berkas.dpr.go.id/pusaka/files/info_singkat/Info%20Singkat-XV-11-I-P3DI-Juni-2023-228.pdf.
Qiang, Z., Wang, J., He, K., & Xu, L. (2023). Potential of passive employees: How servant leadership can stimulate innovation among control-oriented employees. Sustainability, 15(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010144.
Ren, F., Zhang, Q., & Wei, X. (2021). Work Autonomous and Controlled Motivation on Chinese Employees' Work Performance and Innovative Work Behaviour: The Moderating Role of Financial Stress. Front. Psychol. 12:676063. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.676063
Ritchie, H., Rosado, P., & Roser, M. (2020). Emissions by sector: where do greenhouse gases come from?. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions.
Ritchie, H., Rosado, P., & Roser, M. (2023). CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions.
Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2017). Toward a new measure of organizational environmental citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Research, pp. 75, 57–66.
Sass, W., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Donche, V., & Peter, V. P. (2018). “Why (should) I do something for the environment?” profiles of flemish adolescents’ motivation toward the environment. Sustainability, 10(7), 2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072579.
Schermuly, C. C., Creon, L., Gerlach, P., Graßmann, C., & Koch, J. (2022). Leadership Styles and Psychological Empowerment: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(1), 73–95. https://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2075/10.1177/15480518211067751.
Scott, S.G. & Bruce, R.A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
Sipayung, T. (2024). Kebijakan European Green Deal (2024). Retrieved from: https://palmoilina.asia/sawit-hub/kebijakan-european-green-deal/.
Spreitzer, G. (2008). Taking Stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. Barling: Organizational Behavior (Handbook): 54–72.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/psychological-empowerment-workplace-dimensions/docview/199829803/se-2.
The White House. (2021). President Biden’s Actions to Tackle the Climate Crisis. Retrieved from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/climate/.
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.2307/258687.
Tripathi, D., Priyadarshi, P., Kumar, P., & Kumar, S. (2021). Does servant leadership affect work role performance via knowledge sharing and psychological empowerment?. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 51(5), 792–812. https://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2075/10.1108/VJIKMS-10-2019-0159.
University of Maryland. (2022). First-ever just transition plan for coal retirement in Indonesia finds a feasible pathway for a 2045 phase-out. Retrieved from: https://spp.umd.edu/news/first-ever-just-transition-plan-coal-retirement-indonesia-finds-feasible-pathway-2045-phase
Van der Hoven, Adrian G., Mahembe, B., & Hamman-Fisher, D. (2021). The influence of servant leadership on psychological empowerment and organisational citizenship on a sample of teachers. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, p. 19 doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v19i0.1395.
Van Dierendonck, D., Stam, D., Boersma, P., De Windt, N., & Alkema, J. (2014). Same difference? Exploring the differential mechanisms linking servant leadership and transformational leadership to follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 544–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.01.005.
Wang, Z., Ren, S., Chadee, D. & Sun, C. (2021). The influence of exploitative leadership on hospitality employees‚ green innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 99, 0278–4319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103058.
Weinstein, N., et, al. (2023). Supported or stressed while being assessed? How motivational climates in UK University workplaces promote or inhibit researcher well-being. Higher Education Quarterly, 77, 537–557.
West M. A., Farr J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In West M. A., Farr J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3–13). John Wiley and Sons.
World Economic Forum. (2021). How The Oil And Gas Industry Can Take A Lifecycle Approach To Reducing Emissions. Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/08/oil-gas-industry-lifecycle-approach-reducing-emissions/.
Ying, M., Faraz, N. A., Ahmed, F., & Raza, A. (2020). How Does Servant Leadership Foster Employees’ Voluntary Green Behavior? A Sequential Mediation Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5). https://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2075/10.3390/ijerph17051792.
Zafar, H., Ho, J. A., Cheah, J. & Mohamed, R. (2022). Catalyzing voluntary pro-environmental behavior in the textile industry: Environmentally specific servant leadership, psychological empowerment and organizational identity. Journal of Cleaner Production, p. 378, 134366, ISSN 0959-6526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134366.
Zafar, H., Tian, F., Ho, J. A., Zhang, G. (2022). Environmentally specific servant leadership and voluntary pro-environmental behavior in the context of green operations: A serial mediation path. Front Psychology. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059523.
Zeng, J. & Xu, G. (2020). How Servant Leadership Motivates Innovative Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13). doi:10.3390/ijerph17134753.
Copyright (c) 2024 Rahmah Nabila Harina, Riani Rachmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The author(s) hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The author(s) retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
