Exploratory Study of the Phenomenon Quiet Quitting: Manager’s Perspective in a Digital Company
Downloads
Objective: This research aims to explore the phenomenon of "quiet quitting" in digital companies from managers' perspectives. It investigates the causes, behaviors, and impacts of quiet quitting and examines managerial strategies to mitigate this issue and its implications for employee engagement and organizational performance.
Design/Methods/Approach: This qualitative exploratory study employed semi-structured interviews with managers from some digital companies. Participants were selected using the purposive and snowball sampling methods. Data were collected from September to November 2024 and analyzed using thematic analysis, guided by the Social Exchange Theory (SET) and the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model.
Findings: The findings reveal that quiet quitting is primarily triggered by insufficient recognition, poor communication, excessive workloads, and misalignment between employees’ values and organizational culture. Quiet quitting behaviors include minimal task completion, withdrawal from team activities, and reduced initiative. Effective leadership through transparent communication and recognition was found to mitigate this issue. Organizational strategies, such as flexible work arrangements, fair compensation, and career development opportunities, also effectively reduced the need to quit. However, this phenomenon negatively impacts team productivity, morale, and organizational reputation.
Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by providing insights into quiet quitting within the country’s cultural and economic context. Unlike Western-centric studies, it incorporates local values such as collectivism and hierarchical structures, offering a culturally sensitive understanding of this phenomenon in the digital sector.
Practical/Policy Implications: Managers who seek ways to improve employee engagement are advised to foster open communication, recognize employee contributions, and ensure fair workloads. Flexible work arrangements and opportunities for career development can enhance employee engagement and retention. Policymakers and HR practitioners should develop culturally adaptive strategies to address quiet quitting while promoting employee well-being.
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology, 2(1965), 267-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2
Alliger, G.M. (2021), Anti-Work: Psychological Investigations into Its Truths, Problems, and Solutions, Routledge, New York, NY.
Anand, A., Doll, J., & Ray, P. (2024). Drowning in silence: a scale development and validation of quiet quitting and quiet firing. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(4), 721-743.
Araujo, C. (2016, March 4). Defining the Digital Enterprise. Institute for Digital Transformation. Diakses pada 9 November 2024 dari http://www.institutefordigitaltransformation.org/defining-digital-enterprise/
Archibald, M. M. (2015). Investigator triangulation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 228–250. doi: 10.1177/1558689815570092
Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S. and Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(3), 267-285.
Atalay, M., & Dağıstan, U. (2023). Quiet quitting: a new wine in an old bottle? Personnel Review
Aydin, E., & Azizoğlu, Ö. (2022). A New Term for An Existing Concept: Quiet Quitting: A Self-Determination. International Congress on Critical Debates in Social Sciences, December, 285 − 295
Bakker, A. B. and Demerouti, E. (2008). Toward a model of work engagement. Career development international, 13(3), 209-223.
Bakotić, D. (2023). Relationship Between Quiet Quitting and Leadership Orientation: The Case of Croatian Employees. DIEM Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting, 8(1), 38–45. doi:10.17818/diem/2023/1.5
Beehr, T.A. and Gupta, N. (1978), “A note on the structure of employee withdrawal”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 73-79.
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A. and Venkatraman, N. v. (2013). Digital business strategy: toward the next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 471–482.
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life, John Wiley, New York, NY.
Boy, Y., & Sürmeli, M. (2023). Quiet quitting: A significant risk of global healthcare. Journal of Global Health, 13, 03014. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.03014
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology, qualitative research in psychology. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 3(2), 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. Handbook of Research
Methods in Health Social Sciences, 843–860. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103
Caldwell-Sergis, L., Brown, L., McCray, P. & Neal, J. (2023). Corporate digital literacy mandates: Using SDT-based strategies to circumvent “quiet quitting” syndrome. Int. J. Adv. Corp. Learn. (IJAC) 16, 18–36. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v16i2.35747
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Cropanzano, R. and Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
Cypress, B. S. (2017). Rigor or Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 36(4), 253–263. doi:10.1097/dcc.0000000000000253
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–
https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Formica, S., & Sfodera, F. (2022). The Great Resignation and Quiet Quitting paradigm shifts: An overview of the current situation and future research directions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 31(8), 899–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2022.2136601
Galanis, P., Katsiroumpa, A., Vraka, I., Siskou, O., Konstantakopoulou, O., Moisoglou, I., ... & Kaitelidou, D. (2023). The quiet quitting scale: Development and initial validation. AIMS Public Health, 10(4), 828.
Gallup. (2017). "State of the Global Workplace". Gallup Press.
Henning, K. (1998). The Digital Enterprise: How Digitization is Redefining Business. Random House.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The Motivation to Work, 2nd Edn, New York. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Hornsby, J.S., Donald F. Kuratko dan Shanker A. Zahra. (2002). Middle managers’ perceptions of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17: 49-63
Irawanto, D. W., Ramsey, P. L., & Ryan, J.C. (2011.). Tailoring Leadership
Theory to Indonesian Culture. Global Business Review, https://doi.org/10.1177/097215091101200301.
Ireland, R. Duane, M.A. Hitt dan D. Vaidyanath. (2002). Strategic alliances as a pathway to competitive success. Journal of Management, 28: 413-46.
Jiwen Song, L., Tsui, A. S. and Law, K. S. (2009). Unpacking employee responses to organizational exchange mechanisms: The role of social and economic exchange perceptions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 56-93.
Karen, S. C. (2015). Exchange: Social. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Ed. Wright, J. D.). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-008-097086-8.32056-6
Kuratko, Donald F. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 3 (2), 151-203.
Kuratko, Donald F. (2010). Corporate entrepreneurship: An introduction and research review, dalam Zoltan J. Acs, David B. Audretsch (ed.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction, 2nd ed. Springer: 129-63.
Kuratko, Donald F., J.S. Hornsby dan J.W. Bishop. (2005). An examination of managers’ entrepreneurial actions and job satisfaction. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1 (3): 275-91.
Lu, M., Al Mamun, A., Chen, X., Yang, Q. and Masukujjaman, M. (2023). Quiet quitting during COVID-19: the role of psychological empowerment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-16. doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02012-2
Mahand, T., & Caldwell, C. (2023). Quiet Quitting: Causes and Opportunities. Business and Management Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v12n1p9
Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (6th Edition) (6 edition) [E-book]. Prentice Hall.
Montoya, C.R., Castro, R., Frías, D. (2023). Quiet Quitting in the Dominican Republic: The Employers’ Perspective. Management Research: The Journal of the Ibero American Academy of Management. doi: 10.1108/MRJIAM-12-2023-1488
Moczydłowska, J. M. (2024). Quiet quitting as a challenge for human capital management: the results of qualitative research. Scientific Papers of the Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management/Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Slaskiej. Seria Organizacji i Zarzadzanie, (199).
Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145.
Öztürk, E., Arikan, Ö. U., & Ocak, M. (2023). Understanding Quiet Quitting: Triggers, Antecedents, and Consequences. Uluslararası Davranış, Sürdürülebilirlik ve Yönetim Dergisi, 10(18), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.54709/jobesam.1299018
Sahertian, P., & Jawas, U. (2021). Culture and excellent leaders: the case of indigenous and non-indigenous Indonesian leaders. Heliyon, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08288
Seidel, S. and Urquhart, C. (2013). On Emergence and Forcing in Information Systems Grounded Theory Studies: The Case of Strauss and Corbin. Journal of Information Technology, 237–260.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Measurement of engagement and burnout: A two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
Schwartz-Shea, P. and Yanow, D. (2012). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. New York: Routledge.
Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Serenko, A. (2023), "The human capital management perspective on quiet quitting:
Recommendations for employees, managers, and national policymakers", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 27-43, https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2022-0792.
Suhendar, A. D., Setiadi, R., Artati, A., & Rohman, A. (2023). The New Trend: Why Indonesian Digital Start-Up Employees are Opting for Quiet Quitting? WSEAS Transactions on Computer Research. doi:10.37394/232018.2023.11.15
Twenge, J. M. (2023). Gen Z really does have a work ethic problem. Retrieved July 3, 2024, from Generation Tech: https://www.generationtechblog.com/p/gen-z-really-does-have-a-work-ethic
Ulrich, D. and Sutton, R. (2010). Asian Leadership: What Works. McGraw-Hill Singapore - Professional. https://www.amazon.com/Asian-Leadership-Works-Dave-Ulrich/dp/0071084304
Wang, T., Abrantes, C. Furthermore, Liu, Y. (2023). “Intensive care units nurses’ burnout, organizational commitment, turnover intention and hospital workplace violence: A cross-sectional study,” Nurs Open, vol. 10, no. 2, pp.1102–1115. doi:10.1002/nop2.1378
Wu, A., & Wei, W. (2024). Rationalizing quiet quitting? Deciphering the internal mechanism of front-line hospitality employees’ workplace deviance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103681.
Xu, J. (2014). Managing Digital Enterprise: Ten Essential Topics. Springer.
Yıldız, S. (2023). Quiet Quitting: Causes, Consequences, and Suggestions. Social mentality and researcher. Thinker journal. 9(70). 3180–3190. DOI: 10.29228/smryj.6
Copyright (c) 2025 Belinda Rahmadara, Riani Rachmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The author(s) hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The author(s) retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
